Water Method Colonoscopy in Patients With Prior Surgery
Water Colonoscopy Versus Air Colonoscopy for Unsedated Patients With Prior Abdominal or Pelvic Surgery: a Prospective Randomized, Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
observational
110
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Water method with water exchange has been shown to reduce medication requirement and pain experienced during colonoscopy. It increases the success rate of cecal intubation in sedated and unsedated patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. Exchange of water during scope insertion minimizes distension of the colonic lumen and decreases loop formation. Exclusion of air from the colon during insertion by omission of air insufflations and suction removal of residual air prevent elongation of the colon. These maneuvers facilitate colonoscopy insertion in average patients and may enhance the success of difficult colonoscopy. Prior abdominal or pelvic surgery is an independent factor for difficult colonoscopy, the probable adhesion may change the anatomy and increase the discomfort of patients. We postulate that these patients may benefit from using the water method for colonoscopy. In this proposal we test the hypothesis that compared with conventional air insufflations the water method with water exchange significantly enhances the success rate of cecal intubation in patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery. The aim of the study is to compare the outcome of colonoscopy using the water method versus the conventional air method in patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery. The primary outcome is cecal intubation success rate. The secondary outcomes include cecal intubation time, maximum pain score during colonoscopy, overall pain score after colonoscopy and adenoma detection rate.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Nov 2011
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2012
CompletedNovember 7, 2012
November 1, 2012
8 months
November 30, 2011
November 6, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cecal intubation success rate
Insertion of a colonoscope to the cecum
up to ten months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Adenoma detection rate
up to ten months
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
up to ten months
Cecum intubation time
up to ten months
Study Arms (2)
Air colonoscopy
Colonoscopy will be performed without medications and with judicious air insufflation during colonoscope insertion.
Water colonoscopy
Colonoscopy will be performed without medications and aided by water infusion in-lieu of air insufflation during insertion of the colonoscope. The water infusion involves putting warm sterile water into the colon to open up the colon for advancement of the colonoscope until the end of the colon (cecum) is reached. The water is delivered via a needle adaptor or the built-in scope irrigation channel by an infusion pump equipped with a foot switch which will be controlled by the endoscopist. Infused water used to cleanse residual fecal matter will be suctioned as needed to clear the colonic lumen.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery undergoing unsedated colonoscopy will be recruited in this study.
You may qualify if:
- Patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery,
You may not qualify if:
- History of colorectal surgery
- Severe colonic stricture or obstructing tumor
- Patients who cannot give informed consent and those who are hemodynamically unstable
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Endoscopic center, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China
Related Publications (6)
Leung FW. Water exchange may be superior to water immersion for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Dec;9(12):1012-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Sep 22. No abstract available.
PMID: 21946120BACKGROUNDLeung FW, Leung JW, Mann SK, Friedland S, Ramirez FC. The water method significantly enhances patient-centered outcomes in sedated and unsedated colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2011 Sep;43(9):816-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256407. Epub 2011 May 24.
PMID: 21611947BACKGROUNDLeung FW, Harker JO, Jackson G, Okamoto KE, Behbahani OM, Jamgotchian NJ, Aharonian HS, Guth PH, Mann SK, Leung JW. A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):693-700. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.05.020. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
PMID: 20619405BACKGROUNDLeung CW, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R, Wu KK, Leung FW, Friedland S. Water immersion versus standard colonoscopy insertion technique: randomized trial shows promise for minimal sedation. Endoscopy. 2010 Jul;42(7):557-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244231. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
PMID: 20593332BACKGROUNDLeung JW, Mann SK, Siao-Salera R, Ransibrahmanakul K, Lim B, Cabrera H, Canete W, Barredo P, Gutierrez R, Leung FW. A randomized, controlled comparison of warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation versus air insufflation for aiding colonoscopy insertion in sedated patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.253. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
PMID: 19555938BACKGROUNDLuo H, Zhang L, Liu X, Leung FW, Liu Z, Wang X, Xue L, Wu K, Fan D, Pan Y, Guo X. Water exchange enhanced cecal intubation in potentially difficult colonoscopy. Unsedated patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 May;77(5):767-73. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.12.007. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
PMID: 23394837DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yanglin Pan, MD
Air Force Military Medical University, China
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associated professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2011
First Posted
December 5, 2011
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2012
Study Completion
November 1, 2012
Last Updated
November 7, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-11