Dispensing Evaluation of Subjective Comfort, Vision, and Handling of a New Lens Compared to a Marketed Lens
Dispensing Evaluation of Lens Comfort and Subjective Vision of an Etafilcon A With Print and PVP Lens for Dark Eyes
1 other identifier
interventional
103
1 country
6
Brief Summary
To evaluate and compare the performance of a new contact lens to a marketed contact lens.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 2, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 20, 2014
CompletedJune 19, 2018
May 1, 2015
3 months
November 30, 2011
August 30, 2013
June 18, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Subject Reported Overall Quality of Lens Vision Using the Contact Lens User Evaluation (CLUE) Questionnaire
The overall quality of lens vision was assessed using the CLUE questionnaire after 7-9 days of follow-up. The CLUE Questionnaire is a validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range from 0-120.
After 7 to 9 days of lens wear
Subject Reported Overall Lens Comfort Using the Contact Lens User Evaluation (CLUE) Questionnaire
The overall lens comfort was assessed using the CLUE questionnaire after 7-9 days of follow-up.The CLUE Questionnaire is a validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
After 7 to 9 days of lens wear
Subject Reported Overall Lens Handling Using the Contact Lens User Evaluation (CLUE) Questionnaire
The overall lens handling was assessed using the CLUE questionnaire after 7-9 days of follow-up. The CLUE Questionnaire is a validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
After 7 to 9 days of lens wear
Study Arms (2)
EAPVPDE/EADE
OTHERetafilcon A with embedded print and PVP lens for dark eyes worn daily during the first period of 7-9 days, then etafilcon A control lens worn daily during the second period of 7-9 days, with 1-3 days of wash-out time between the 2 periods.
EADE/EAPVPDE
OTHERetafilcon A control lens worn daily during the first period of 7-9 days, then etafilcon A with embedded print and PVP for dark eyes lens worn daily during the second period of 7-9 days, with 1-3 days of wash-out time between the 2 periods.
Interventions
A daily disposable contact lens
A marketed daily disposable contact lens
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject must be a healthy adult at least 18 years of age and no more than 34 years of age.
- The subjects must be female, dark eye Caucasian, Non-Hispanic habitual soft contact lens wearer (both eyes).
- The subject rated the Concept Statement positively (i.e., a rating of 4 or 5). If not the subject is not eligible to participate.
- The subject must have no known ocular or systemic allergies that might interfere with contact lens wear.
- The subject must have no known systemic disease, or need for medication, which might interfere with contact lens wear.
- The subject's optimal vertexed spherical equivalent distance correction must be between-1.00 and -4.00D.
- Any cylinder power must be:\<=0.75D.
- The subject must have visual acuity best correctable to 20/25 or better for each eye.
- The subject must have normal eyes (no ocular medications or ocular infection of any type).
- The subject must read and sign the Statement of Informed Consent.
- The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- Ocular or systemic allergies or disease which might interfere with contact lens wear.
- Systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication which might interfere with contact lens wear.
- Clinically significant (grade 3 or worse) corneal edema, corneal neovascularization, corneal staining, or any other abnormalities of the cornea which would contraindicate contact lens wear.
- Clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) tarsal abnormalities or bulbar injection which might interfere with contact lens wear.
- Any ocular infection.
- Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear.
- Any color deficiencies (color blindness) - to the best of the subject's knowledge.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Diabetes.
- Infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or an immuno-suppressive disease (e.g. HIV).
- Habitual contact lens type is toric, multifocal, or is worn as extended wear.
- Subject presents with one dark iris color and one light iris color
- Subject has heterochromia iridis (a difference in color between parts of one iris)
- The subject is an employee or family member of the clinical study site.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Unknown Facility
Bloomfield, Connecticut, 06002, United States
Unknown Facility
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308, United States
Unknown Facility
Overland Park, Kansas, 66207, United States
Unknown Facility
Jamestown, New York, 14750, United States
Unknown Facility
Kingston, Pennsylvania, 18704, United States
Unknown Facility
Moon Township, Pennsylvania, 15108, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michael Mayers, OD, FAAO
- Organization
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2011
First Posted
December 2, 2011
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2012
Study Completion
February 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 19, 2018
Results First Posted
January 20, 2014
Record last verified: 2015-05