Evaluation of the Performance of Two Contact Lenses Compared to a Marketed Lens
Clinical Validation of Etafilcon A With Print and PVP Contact Lenses for Dark Eyes and Light Eyes
1 other identifier
interventional
275
1 country
15
Brief Summary
This study will serve to evaluate and compare the performance of two new lenses to a marketed lens.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 2, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 15, 2013
CompletedJune 19, 2018
May 1, 2015
3 months
November 30, 2011
August 30, 2013
June 18, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Monocular Visual Acuity
Monocular distance Snellen visual acuity (VA) scores were coverted to the algorithm of the minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR) scale based on the following formula: LogMAR = Log10 (VA/20) - a\*VAR, where Log10 = base 10 logarithm, VA = the Snellen denominator score, a = LogMAR stepsize coefficient and VAR = letter gained or missing in addition to the Snellen denominator score.
Dispensing
Lens Fit Acceptance
The overall lens fit was evaluated by the Investigators for each eye whether it was acceptable (yes/no).
Dispensing
Corneal Staining of Grade 3 or 4
Corneal staining was graded using a 5-point scale; 0=None(no staining), 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Only those eyes with corneal staining grade \>= 3 were reported.
After 7-9 days of lens wear
Study Arms (4)
EALE/1DM
OTHERetafilcon A with PVP for light eyes worn during the first period of 7-9 days then etafilcon A control lens worn during the second period of 7-9 days, with a 1-3 days of wash-out time between the 2 periods.
1DM/EALE
OTHERetafilcon A control lens worn during the first period of 7-9 days then etafilcon A with PVP for light eyes worn during the second period of 7-9 days, with a 1-3 days of wash-out time between the 2 periods.
EADE/1DM
OTHERetafilcon A with PVP for dark eyes worn during the first period of 7-9 days then etafilcon A control lens worn during the second period of 7-9 days, with a 1-3 days of wash-out time between the 2 periods.
1DM/EADE
OTHERetafilcon A control lens worn during the first period of 7-9 days then etafilcon A with PVP for dark eyes worn during the second period of 7-9 days, with a 1-3 days of wash-out time between the 2 periods.
Interventions
A marketed daily disposable contact lens
A daily disposable contact lens
A daily disposable contact lens
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy, female adult, at least 18 years of age, and no more than 34 years of age
- The subjects must be female, light eye Caucasian, Non-Hispanic, habitual soft contact lens wearer (both eyes) with light or dark eyes
- Must have rated the Concept Statement positively (i.e., a rating of 4 or 5).
- Optimal vertexed spherical equivalent distance correction must be between -1.00 and -4.00 diopters (D)
- Any cylinder power must be: \<=0.75D
- Visual acuity must be best correctable to 20/25 or better for each eye
- Must have normal eyes (no ocular medications or ocular infection of any type)
- Must read and sign the Statement of Informed Consent
- Must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- Ocular or systemic allergies or disease which might interfere with contact lens wear
- Systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication which might interfere with contact lens wear
- Clinically significant (grade 3 or worse) corneal edema, corneal neovascularization, corneal staining, or any other abnormalities of the cornea which would contraindicate contact lens wear
- Clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) tarsal abnormalities or bulbar injection which might interfere with contact lens wear
- Any ocular infection
- Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear
- Any color deficiencies (colorblindness) - to the best of the subject's knowledge
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Diabetes
- Infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or an immuno-suppressive disease (e.g. HIV)
- Habitual contact lens type is toric, multifocal, or is worn as extended wear.
- Subject presents with one dark iris color and one light iris color.
- Subject has heterochromia iridis (a difference in color between parts of one iris).
- The subject must not be an employee or family member of the clinical study site.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (15)
Advanced Optometry
Mission Viejo, California, 92691, United States
James R Dugue, Optometrist
Mission Viejo, California, 92691, United States
Advance Eye Care
Pismo Beach, California, 93448, United States
Golden Vision
Sarasota, Florida, 34242, United States
Eye Associates of Winter Park
Winter Park, Florida, 32789, United States
Eye Care Associates
Bloomington, Illinois, 61701, United States
Kannarr Eye Care
Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762, United States
Vision Care
East Lansing, Michigan, 48826, United States
Spectrum Eye Care
Jamestown, New York, 14702, United States
Sacco Eye Group
Vestal, New York, 13850, United States
The Eye Care Group
Grants Pass, Oregon, 97526, United States
Dr. David W Ferris and Associates
Warwick, Rhode Island, 02887, United States
Wishnow Sugar Group
Katy, Texas, 77450, United States
Isthmus Eye Care
Middleton, Wisconsin, 53562, United States
Snowy Range Cision Center
Laramie, Wyoming, 82070, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Michael Mayers, O.D., FAAO, Senior Research Optometrist
- Organization
- Vistakon, Johnson and Johnson Vision Care
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2011
First Posted
December 2, 2011
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2012
Study Completion
February 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 19, 2018
Results First Posted
November 15, 2013
Record last verified: 2015-05