A Five-Year Metal-on-Metal Retrospective Clinical Study
2 other identifiers
observational
126
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This retrospective study will review the Anderson Orthopaedic Institute's initial experience among a consecutive series of 126 patients who had primary total hip arthroplasty using a metal-on-metal articulation consisting of a DePuy Pinnacle cup with an Ultamet liner coupled with a 36-mm cobalt-chrome alloy femoral head. The relationship between metal ion levels, cup orientation, osteolysis, radiographic implant stability and clinical outcome measures including component revision, complications, patient satisfaction and Harris Hip Scores will be evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2011
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 30, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 9, 2013
CompletedOctober 9, 2013
August 1, 2013
6 months
November 23, 2011
June 30, 2012
August 1, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Metal Ion Levels Per Participant
Metal ion levels include cobalt and chromium ion levels determined from tests of blood samples. Metal ion levels are reported per participant since blood samples were taken from individual participants who could have had one or both hips replaced.
At a mean of 4.2 years after primary total hip arthroplasty
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Cup Orientation Per Hip
On the first post-operative anteroposterior pelvic radiograph after primary total hip arthroplasty
Harris Hip Score Per Hip
At a mean of 5.6 years after primary total hip arthroplasty
Osteolysis Per Hip
At a mean of 5.6 years after primary total hip arthroplasty
Implant Stability Per Hip
At a mean of 5.6 years after primary total hip arthroplasty
Component Revision Per Hip
At a mean of 6.7 years after primary total hip arthroplasty
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasties
Consecutive series of patients who had metal-on-metal primary total hip arthroplasty performed with DePuy Pinnacle cups, Ultamet metal liners and 36-mm cobalt-chromium alloy femoral heads.
Interventions
Replacement of a patient's native hip with an artificial implant featuring a metal-on-metal articulation
Eligibility Criteria
A consecutive series of patients who had primary total hip arthroplasties performed at the Anderson Clinic using DePuy Pinnacle cups, Ultamet metal liners and 36-mm cobalt-chromium alloy femoral heads.
You may qualify if:
- Primary total hip arthroplasty patients who had surgery between April 2001 and November 2002 who were implanted with a Pinnacle acetabular cup, an Ultamet metal-on-metal insert and a 36mm cobalt-chrome alloy femoral head
You may not qualify if:
- Revision total hip arthroplasties
- Primary total hip arthroplasties using Ultamet liners coupled with 28-mm femoral heads
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institutelead
- DePuy Orthopaedicscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
Alexandria, Virginia, 22306, United States
Related Publications (9)
MacDonald SJ. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: the concerns. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec;(429):86-93. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150309.48474.8b.
PMID: 15577471BACKGROUNDBozic KJ, Kurtz S, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul;91(7):1614-20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01220.
PMID: 19571083BACKGROUNDBozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0945-0. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
PMID: 19554385BACKGROUNDDowson D, Hardaker C, Flett M, Isaac GH. A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: Part II: design. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec;19(8 Suppl 3):124-30. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.016.
PMID: 15578566BACKGROUNDRieker CB, Schon R, Kottig P. Development and validation of a second-generation metal-on-metal bearing: laboratory studies and analysis of retrievals. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec;19(8 Suppl 3):5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.017.
PMID: 15578545BACKGROUNDSilva M, Heisel C, Schmalzried TP. Metal-on-metal total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Jan;(430):53-61. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000149995.84350.d7.
PMID: 15662304BACKGROUNDBeaule PE, Campbell P, Mirra J, Hooper JC, Schmalzried TP. Osteolysis in a cementless, second generation metal-on-metal hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 May;(386):159-65. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200105000-00020.
PMID: 11347829BACKGROUNDWillert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, Flury R, Windler M, Koster G, Lohmann CH. Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jan;87(1):28-36. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.A.02039pp.
PMID: 15637030BACKGROUNDEngh CA Jr, Ho H, Engh CA. Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: does early clinical outcome justify the chance of an adverse local tissue reaction? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):406-12. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1063-8. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
PMID: 19727991BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Robert H. Hopper, Jr., PhD
- Organization
- Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert H Hopper, Jr., PhD
Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2011
First Posted
November 30, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
October 9, 2013
Results First Posted
October 9, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-08