NCT01480089

Brief Summary

The purpose of this trial is to determine the effect of spraying a local anesthetic called Ropivacaine (numbing medicine) into the abdominal cavity prior to surgery. Ropivacaine is a local anesthetic used to block pain in the body. There are studies showing that Ropivacaine decreases the pain of surgery with minimally invasive (laparoscopic) appendix and gallbladder removal but has not been tried in robotic pelvic surgery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
56

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2011

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2011

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 23, 2011

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 28, 2011

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2013

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 27, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

July 27, 2016

Status Verified

June 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

November 23, 2011

Results QC Date

June 16, 2016

Last Update Submit

June 16, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Surgical Pain ManagementRobotic surgeryRopivacaine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Post-op Pain With Atomized Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine (AIR)

    Participants are asked to rate their pain level using the visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS is a measurement of pain where respondents specify their level of pain by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points. The VAS used in this study was a horizontal line of 100 mm length anchored by two word descriptors - one word at each end: No pain (left end) and Very Severe Pain (right end). The VAS score is determined by measuring in millimeters from the left hand end of the line to the point that the patient marks. The VAS range is 0 to 100.

    2 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Post-op Pain With Atomized Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine (AIR)

    12 hours after surgery

Study Arms (2)

Atomized Intraperitoneal Saline (AIS)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants randomized to this arm will be given atomized intraperitoneal saline(AIS).

Drug: Atomized Intraperitoneal Saline (AIS)

Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine(AIR)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants randomized to this arm will receive atomized intraperitoneal ropivacaine (AIR).

Drug: Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine (AIR)

Interventions

Ropivacaine 2 mg/kg per lean body mass up to no more than 200mg total dose will be atomized and delivered into the peritoneal cavity at the completion of surgery.

Also known as: Ropivacaine
Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine(AIR)

Atomized saline will be administered to the peritoneal cavity at the completion of surgery.

Also known as: Placebo
Atomized Intraperitoneal Saline (AIS)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Consent to undergo robotic assisted gynecologic or urologic surgery
  • Between the ages of 18 and 75
  • Able to consent, fill out study documents, and complete all study procedures and follow-up visits

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with an allergy to local anesthetics
  • Patients with severe underlying cardiovascular, renal or hepatic disease
  • Pregnant patients

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Loyola University Medical Center

Maywood, Illinois, 60153, United States

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):534-540. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E.

    PMID: 12873949BACKGROUND
  • Hartog CS, Rothaug J, Goettermann A, Zimmer A, Meissner W. Room for improvement: nurses' and physicians' views of a post-operative pain management program. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Mar;54(3):277-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02161.x. Epub 2009 Nov 12.

    PMID: 19912126BACKGROUND
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 2012 Feb;116(2):248-73. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823c1030. No abstract available.

    PMID: 22227789BACKGROUND
  • Boddy AP, Mehta S, Rhodes M. The effect of intraperitoneal local anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2006 Sep;103(3):682-8. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000226268.06279.5a.

    PMID: 16931681BACKGROUND
  • Kang H, Kim BG. Intraperitoneal ropivacaine for effective pain relief after laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Int Med Res. 2010 May-Jun;38(3):821-32. doi: 10.1177/147323001003800309.

    PMID: 20819419BACKGROUND
  • McClure JH. Ropivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 1996 Feb;76(2):300-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/76.2.300. No abstract available.

    PMID: 8777115BACKGROUND
  • Bleckner LL, Bina S, Kwon KH, McKnight G, Dragovich A, Buckenmaier CC 3rd. Serum ropivacaine concentrations and systemic local anesthetic toxicity in trauma patients receiving long-term continuous peripheral nerve block catheters. Anesth Analg. 2010 Feb 1;110(2):630-4. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c76a33. Epub 2009 Dec 2.

    PMID: 19955504BACKGROUND
  • Labaille T, Mazoit JX, Paqueron X, Franco D, Benhamou D. The clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal ropivacaine for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg. 2002 Jan;94(1):100-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200201000-00019.

    PMID: 11772809BACKGROUND
  • Mueller ER, Kenton K, Anger JT, Bresee C, Tarnay C. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):917-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 12.

    PMID: 27180224BACKGROUND
  • Collins GG, Gadzinski JA, Fitzgerald GD, Sheran J, Wagner S, Edelstein S, Mueller ER. Surgical Pain Control With Ropivacaine by Atomized Delivery (Spray): A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jan;23(1):40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.07.018. Epub 2015 Aug 1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Interventions

Ropivacaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Limitations and Caveats

There are no caveats to report.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Elizabeth Mueller, M.D.
Organization
Loyola University

Study Officials

  • Elizabeth Mueller, MD

    Loyola University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2011

First Posted

November 28, 2011

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion

February 1, 2013

Study Completion

February 1, 2013

Last Updated

July 27, 2016

Results First Posted

July 27, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available

Locations