NCT01383200

Brief Summary

In this study the investigators will be comparing two different types of anesthetic, a numbing eye drop and a numbing gel, to test if they are equally effective or if one has a better outcome in terms of the level of comfort you experience one hour and one day after your surgery. The two medications are commonly used and appear to be equally effective for other types of eye surgery, such as cataract surgery. This study will show if one type of anesthesia is preferred over another by patients getting LASIK. Before your LASIK procedure, you will be given a short questionnaire to determine the baseline comfort of your eyes. In the operating room, one type of anesthetic will be put in one eye, and the other medication will be put in the other eye. Which anesthetic you get in each eye will be chosen in a random way (similar to flipping a coin). After your LASIK surgery, the investigators will ask you if you felt more comfort in your right eye, your left eye, or if they were equal, and the investigators will ask you the same survey questions that were asked prior to your LASIK to get more details about your experience. \*Of note- the randomization being done is for which eye will be receiving the lidocaine and which eye will be receiving the tetracaine. Each patient will receive lidocaine in 1 eye and tetracaine in the other eye, the randomization is for each individual eye. This means, of 11 patients in our study, 22 eyes received treatment. 11 eyes received lidocaine and 11 eyes received tetracaine. when we did our comparison, 11 values were used for lidocaine and 11 eyes were used for tetracaine, giving a total of 22 eyes. This is important to note since the randomization refers to EYE for each individual patient, and not for the patient (ie: participant means 1 eye, not 1 person in the descriptions below).

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
11

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4 pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2011

Shorter than P25 for phase_4 pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2011

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 13, 2011

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 28, 2011

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2011

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

August 11, 2017

Status Verified

June 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

June 13, 2011

Results QC Date

January 14, 2013

Last Update Submit

July 13, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

efficacycomfort

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Participants Score on Pain Scale

    Do you have sharp pain in your eye? Pain will be assessed by units on a scale of 1-5: 1 means no symptoms, 2 means slight discomfort, 3 means mild discomfort, 4 means moderate discomfort, and 5 means severe discomfort

    1 hour (60minutes) post LASIK operation

Study Arms (2)

Tetracaine R/Lidocaine L

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participant's Right or Left eye will receive 0.5% Tetracaine drop, at 10 minutes and 5 minutes, prior to LASIK.

Drug: Tetracaine dropDrug: Lidocaine gel

Tetracaine L/Lidocaine R

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participant's Right or Left eye will receive 2% lidocaine gel, at 10 minutes and 5 minutes, prior to LASIK.

Drug: Tetracaine dropDrug: Lidocaine gel

Interventions

0.5% Tetracaine Right eye / 2% Lidocaine Left eye

Also known as: TetraVisc, Altacaine, AK-T-Caine and Pontocaine Ophthalmic
Tetracaine L/Lidocaine RTetracaine R/Lidocaine L

0.5% Tetracaine Left eye / 2% Lidocaine Right eye

Also known as: Akten
Tetracaine L/Lidocaine RTetracaine R/Lidocaine L

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • healthy volunteers of age 18 years or greater

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous reaction/allergy to the same drug class
  • prior ocular surgery
  • active facial injuries
  • any active current ophthalmological disease
  • history of diabetes
  • any current non- Over The Counter pain medication
  • inability to complete the questionnaire.
  • Economically or educationally disadvantaged persons, Prisoners, or Children
  • Patients with fluctuating or impaired decision-making capacity
  • Any other condition that the investigator believes would pose a significant hazard to the subject if the investigational therapy were initiated

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Bascom Palmer Eye Institute

Miami, Florida, 33136, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Shah NV, Vaddavalli PK, Chow JH, Roman JS, Shi W, Yoo SH. Prospective, double-masked, randomized trial comparing lidocaine gel to tetracaine drops in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2012 Oct;28(10):671-2. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20121001-05. No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Interventions

TetracaineLidocaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

para-AminobenzoatesAminobenzoatesBenzoatesAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsAcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesAniline CompoundsAmines

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Sonia Yoo
Organization
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute

Study Officials

  • SONIA YOO, MD

    University of Miami

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PROFESSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2011

First Posted

June 28, 2011

Study Start

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion

October 1, 2011

Study Completion

October 1, 2011

Last Updated

August 11, 2017

Results First Posted

April 1, 2015

Record last verified: 2017-06

Locations