Study Stopped
eyes that received gel had slightly thinner than intended flaps
Tetracaine Versus Lidocaine Gel for Anesthetic Effect and Comfort in Patients Undergoing LASIK
Comparison of 0.5% Tetracaine Drops Versus 2% Lidocaine Gel for Anesthetic Efficacy and Comfort in Patients Undergoing LASIK
1 other identifier
interventional
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study the investigators will be comparing two different types of anesthetic, a numbing eye drop and a numbing gel, to test if they are equally effective or if one has a better outcome in terms of the level of comfort you experience one hour and one day after your surgery. The two medications are commonly used and appear to be equally effective for other types of eye surgery, such as cataract surgery. This study will show if one type of anesthesia is preferred over another by patients getting LASIK. Before your LASIK procedure, you will be given a short questionnaire to determine the baseline comfort of your eyes. In the operating room, one type of anesthetic will be put in one eye, and the other medication will be put in the other eye. Which anesthetic you get in each eye will be chosen in a random way (similar to flipping a coin). After your LASIK surgery, the investigators will ask you if you felt more comfort in your right eye, your left eye, or if they were equal, and the investigators will ask you the same survey questions that were asked prior to your LASIK to get more details about your experience. \*Of note- the randomization being done is for which eye will be receiving the lidocaine and which eye will be receiving the tetracaine. Each patient will receive lidocaine in 1 eye and tetracaine in the other eye, the randomization is for each individual eye. This means, of 11 patients in our study, 22 eyes received treatment. 11 eyes received lidocaine and 11 eyes received tetracaine. when we did our comparison, 11 values were used for lidocaine and 11 eyes were used for tetracaine, giving a total of 22 eyes. This is important to note since the randomization refers to EYE for each individual patient, and not for the patient (ie: participant means 1 eye, not 1 person in the descriptions below).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4 pain
Started Jun 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 13, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 1, 2015
CompletedAugust 11, 2017
June 1, 2017
4 months
June 13, 2011
January 14, 2013
July 13, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Participants Score on Pain Scale
Do you have sharp pain in your eye? Pain will be assessed by units on a scale of 1-5: 1 means no symptoms, 2 means slight discomfort, 3 means mild discomfort, 4 means moderate discomfort, and 5 means severe discomfort
1 hour (60minutes) post LASIK operation
Study Arms (2)
Tetracaine R/Lidocaine L
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipant's Right or Left eye will receive 0.5% Tetracaine drop, at 10 minutes and 5 minutes, prior to LASIK.
Tetracaine L/Lidocaine R
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipant's Right or Left eye will receive 2% lidocaine gel, at 10 minutes and 5 minutes, prior to LASIK.
Interventions
0.5% Tetracaine Right eye / 2% Lidocaine Left eye
0.5% Tetracaine Left eye / 2% Lidocaine Right eye
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- healthy volunteers of age 18 years or greater
You may not qualify if:
- Previous reaction/allergy to the same drug class
- prior ocular surgery
- active facial injuries
- any active current ophthalmological disease
- history of diabetes
- any current non- Over The Counter pain medication
- inability to complete the questionnaire.
- Economically or educationally disadvantaged persons, Prisoners, or Children
- Patients with fluctuating or impaired decision-making capacity
- Any other condition that the investigator believes would pose a significant hazard to the subject if the investigational therapy were initiated
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Related Publications (1)
Shah NV, Vaddavalli PK, Chow JH, Roman JS, Shi W, Yoo SH. Prospective, double-masked, randomized trial comparing lidocaine gel to tetracaine drops in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2012 Oct;28(10):671-2. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20121001-05. No abstract available.
PMID: 23061994DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Sonia Yoo
- Organization
- Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
SONIA YOO, MD
University of Miami
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PROFESSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 13, 2011
First Posted
June 28, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
October 1, 2011
Study Completion
October 1, 2011
Last Updated
August 11, 2017
Results First Posted
April 1, 2015
Record last verified: 2017-06