Efficacy of Injection Therapy for Lateral Epicondylosis
The Efficacy of Prolotherapy and Platelet Rich Plasma Injections for Lateral Epicondylosis: a Pilot Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
31
1 country
2
Brief Summary
While evidence does not identify any conventional therapy as definitive for chronic lateral epicondylosis (CLE, tennis elbow), basic science and limited pilot level trials support rigorous assessment of prolotherapy (PrT) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as therapy for CLE. The proposed study will conduct a pilot RCT assessing 2 PrT solutions and PRP injections commonly used in the treatment of moderate-to-severe tennis elbow using clinical, biomechanical and radiological outcomes. Data from this study will support a future confirmatory study to find an effective treatment for moderate-to-severe tennis elbow. In support of this goal, the investigators propose the following research questions. Does PrT or PRP, compared to waitlist control:
- 1.improve pain- and function-dependent, CLE-specific quality of life among adults with CLE, as assessed by a validated questionnaire, the elbow-specific Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation?
- 2.improve upper extremity performance among adults with CLE as assessed by a blinded assessor using elbow-specific, effort-dependent biomechanical measures of grip strength (pain-free and maximal), stiffness, effective mass and damping
- 3.improve the radiologic appearance of several pathologic features of CLE as evaluated using imaging studies of lateral elbow structures: ultrasound to assess a) neovascularity (color Doppler), b) hypoechogenicity (grayscale US), and c) tendon stiffness ("acousto-elastic strain gauge" technique) using standardized, 0-3 severity scales, and d) MRI to assess the overall common extensor tensor tendon disease severity using a standardized 0-3 scale?
- 4.provide satisfying treatment to subjects as assessed by a treatment satisfaction survey and a qualitative exit interview?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Jun 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_2
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedFebruary 18, 2019
February 1, 2019
2.4 years
October 25, 2011
February 14, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE)
Validated disease specific quality of life questionnaire conducted at 0, 16 (all subjects) and 32 weeks (PrT only).The PRTEE will assess elbow related quality of life at each of the specified time points. Change in quality of life score in the study groups over time will be compared.
0, 16 and 32 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Biomedical (grip strength), ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
0 and 16 weeks
Study Arms (4)
PrT-DMS
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1.0 mL 5% morrhuate sodium + 1.5 mL 50% dextrose, 1 mL 2% lidocaine and 3.5 mL normal saline.
PrT-D
EXPERIMENTALPrT-D solution is 4 mL 50% dextrose, 3 mL normal saline, and 2 mL 2% lidocaine
Waitlist
NO INTERVENTIONPlatelet rich plasma
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
PrT-D solution is 4 mL 50% dextrose, 3 mL normal saline, and 2 mL 2% lidocaine
PrT-DMS. 1.0 mL 5% morrhuate sodium + 1.5 mL 50% dextrose, 1 mL 2% lidocaine and 3.5 mL normal saline.
Platelet rich plasma injection therapy (PRP) uses components of autologous blood to promote healing in chronically diseased joint tissues.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 18-65 years
- diagnosis of CLE, confirmed by the PI using clinical symptoms and exam findings of tenderness over the lateral epicondyle and/or extensor tendon, and pain on 2 extensor muscle provocation tests
- self-reported CLE-related pain for at least 6 months
- self-reported failure of at least 2 of the 3 most common treatments for CLE (a course of NSAIDS, physical therapy or corticosteroid injections).
You may not qualify if:
- current bilateral CLE
- a corticosteroid injection in the prior 3 months or prior PrT or PRP for CLE
- current carpal tunnel syndrome, other elbow pathology, or acute trauma of the CLE-affected upper extremity
- self-reported history of bleeding disorders, other hematologic conditions, inflammatory arthritis, systemic nervous system disease, upper extremity surgeries or neuropathy
- current use of opioids for pain
- anticoagulation or immunosuppressive therapy in the prior month
- intent to use NSAIDs or steroids
- known allergy to dextrose, acetaminophen or lidocaine
- MRI contraindications: non-compatible metal in the CLE-affected upper extremity or severe claustrophobia
- unresolved litigation
- self-reported pregnancy. Pregnant women are excluded from the study because pregnancy changes the characteristics of connective tissue including ligaments and tendons associated with CLE and, so, is an unacceptable confounder in this pilot level study. There is no report however, about dextrose, morrhuate sodium or PrT being harmful to pregnant women. Therefore we will not draw confirmatory labs to ensure that women of childbearing age are not pregnant. Rather we will accept self-report on pregnancy status at the time of consent. If a woman becomes pregnant during the study she will be dropped from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Northeast Family Medical Center
Madison, Wisconsin, 53704, United States
University of Wisconsin General Clinical Research Center
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David P Rabago, MD
University of Wisconsin, Department of Family Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Wilson, MD
UW Dept of Family Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2011
First Posted
November 22, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2009
Primary Completion
November 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02