Study Stopped
Recruitment problems
Effects of Mutations of the Glycine Gene Associated With Hyperekplexia on Central Pain Processing
2 other identifiers
interventional
9
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Mutations in genes affecting pain transmission start to be known, the investigators are investigating a mutation in a glycine channel, which has an influence on pain modulation. Pain modulation is the ability of the central nervous system to enhance or diminish the sensation of pain. The investigators therefore will test patients and healthy volunteers with quantitative sensory tests, basically determining the point at which a stimulation just starts to induce pain. These tests are reliable and permit a direct comparison between healthy volunteers and patients with the affected glycine gene.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedSeptember 4, 2014
September 1, 2014
1.2 years
November 2, 2011
September 3, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pressure pain detection threshold measured in kPA, measured with electronic pressure algometer applied at the centre of the pulp of the 2nd toe
Pain detection thresholds will be measured with an electronic pressure algometer applied at the center of the pulp of the 2nd toe. The probe has a surface area of 1 cm2. The pressure is increased from 0 at a rate of 30kPa/s to a maximum pressure of 1000kPa. Pain detection threshold is defined as the point at which the pressure sensation turns to pain. The subjects are instructed to press a button when these points are reached. The algometer displays the pressure intensity at which the button is pressed.
Within 0 to 33 seconds after the beginning of the stimulation
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Electric pain reflex, as measured with electromyography from the biceps femoris and the rectus femoris muscles
Within 50 to 150 ms after the beginning of stimulation
Heat and cold pain detection thresholds, as measured with a thermode in degrees Celsius
Within 0 to 14 seconds after the beginning of the stimulation
Ice water pain threshold of the hand as measured in seconds the hand was left in the water, measured with ice water container
Within 0 to 2 minutes after the beginning of the stimulation
Pressure pain detection threshold measured in kPA, measured with electronic pressure algometer applied at the centre of the pulp of the 2nd toe
At the end of the experiment, expected to be after 30 minutes on average
Study Arms (1)
1
EXPERIMENTALIn the setting of comparing patients with a genetic mutation and healthy volunteers blinding of the PI would demand a substantial increase in co-workers (i.e. recruitment, selection of age-and sex matched volunteers), reason why no blinding was chosen. Affected patients will be compared to age and sex matched volunteers, recruited after completion of testing 23 hyperekplexia patients.
Interventions
The testing will be the same for healthy volunteers and patients with a mutations in the glycine channel.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Hyperekplexia
- GLRA1
- GLRB
- SCLA5
- GPHN
- Gephyrin
- ARHGEF9
You may not qualify if:
- Age below 7 years
- Pregnancy
- Breast feeding
- Ongoing medication
- Cognitive impairment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dep. of Anesthesia and Pain medicine, Bern University Hospital
Bern, Canton of Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Related Publications (4)
Zhou L, Chillag KL, Nigro MA. Hyperekplexia: a treatable neurogenetic disease. Brain Dev. 2002 Oct;24(7):669-74. doi: 10.1016/s0387-7604(02)00095-5.
PMID: 12427512BACKGROUNDAndermann F, Keene DL, Andermann E, Quesney LF. Startle disease or hyperekplexia: further delineation of the syndrome. Brain. 1980 Dec;103(4):985-97. doi: 10.1093/brain/103.4.985.
PMID: 6777025BACKGROUNDPraveen V, Patole SK, Whitehall JS. Hyperekplexia in neonates. Postgrad Med J. 2001 Sep;77(911):570-2. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.911.570.
PMID: 11524514BACKGROUNDMuller F, Heinke B, Sandkuhler J. Reduction of glycine receptor-mediated miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents in rat spinal lamina I neurons after peripheral inflammation. Neuroscience. 2003;122(3):799-805. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.07.009.
PMID: 14622922BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Michele Curatolo, Prof.
Dep. of Anesthesia and Pain medicine, Bern University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2011
First Posted
November 22, 2011
Study Start
October 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
September 4, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-09