Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability of Vilazodone in Major Depressive Disorder
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Fixed-dose Study of Vilazodone in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
1 other identifier
interventional
518
1 country
14
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to further characterize the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a single fixed dose level of vilazodone compared to placebo in patients with major depressive disorder.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 major-depressive-disorder
Started Dec 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 major-depressive-disorder
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 3, 2014
CompletedApril 3, 2014
February 1, 2014
1.2 years
November 14, 2011
February 21, 2014
February 21, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Ă…sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 8
The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale for assessing depressive symptomatology that had occurred in participants during the week preceding each interview. Patients were rated on 10 items to assess feelings of sadness, lassitude, pessimism, inner tension, suicidality, reduced sleep or appetite, difficulty concentrating, and lack of interest. Each item was scored on a 7-point scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The total score was the sum of the scores on the 10 items and ranged from 0 to 60. A higher score indicated more depressive symptomatology. A negative change score indicated improvement.
Baseline to Week 8
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 8
Baseline to Week 8
Percentage of Participants With a Montgomery-Ă…sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Sustained Response Rate
Baseline to Week 8
Study Arms (2)
Dose-matched placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants received dose-matched placebo orally once daily for 9 weeks.
Vilazodone
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received vilazodone orally once daily for 9 weeks, as follows: Week 1, 10 mg once a day; Week 2, 20 mg once a day; Weeks 3 to 8, 40 mg once a day; and Week 9 (down-taper period), 20 mg once a day for 4 days, then 10 mg once a day for 3 days.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women, 18-70 years of age.
- Currently meet the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for Major Depressive Disorder.
- The patient's current major depressive episode must be at least 8 weeks and no longer than 12 months in duration.
You may not qualify if:
- Women who are pregnant, women who will be breastfeeding during the study, and women of childbearing potential who are not practicing a reliable method of birth control.
- Patients with a history of meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for any:
- manic, hypomanic or mixed episode, including bipolar disorder and substance-induced manic, hypomanic, or mixed episode;
- any depressive episode with psychotic or catatonic features;
- panic disorder with or without agoraphobia;
- obsessive-compulsive disorder;
- schizophrenia, schizoaffective, or other psychotic disorder;
- bulimia or anorexia nervosa;
- presence of borderline personality disorder or antisocial personality disorder;
- mental retardation, dementia, amnesia, or other cognitive disorders;
- patients who are considered a suicide risk.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (14)
Forest Investigative Site 009
Beverly Hills, California, 90210, United States
Forest Investigative Site 003
Encino, California, 91316, United States
Forest Investigative Site 010
New Port Beach, California, 92660, United States
Forest Investigative Site 005
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216, United States
Forest Investigative Site 004
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Forest Investigative Site 012
Atlanta, Georgia, 30328, United States
Forest Investigative Site 001
Baltimore, Maryland, 21285, United States
Forest Investigative Site 002
Dayton, Ohio, 45417, United States
Forest Investigative Site 011
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Forest Investigative Site 015
Lincoln, Rhode Island, 02865, United States
Forest Investigative Site 008
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States
Forest Investigative Site 016
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Forest Investigative Site 006
Bellevue, Washington, 98007, United States
Forest Investigative Site 013
Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States
Related Publications (3)
Kornstein S, Chang CT, Gommoll CP, Edwards J. Vilazodone efficacy in subgroups of patients with major depressive disorder: a post-hoc analysis of four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Jul;33(4):217-223. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000217.
PMID: 29608461DERIVEDCroft HA, Pomara N, Gommoll C, Chen D, Nunez R, Mathews M. Efficacy and safety of vilazodone in major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;75(11):e1291-8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m08992.
PMID: 25470094DERIVEDCitrome L, Gommoll CP, Tang X, Nunez R, Mathews M. Evaluating the efficacy of vilazodone in achieving remission in patients with major depressive disorder: post-hoc analyses of a phase IV trial. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Mar;30(2):75-81. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000056.
PMID: 25396353DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Carl Gommoll
- Organization
- Forest Research Institute, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Carl Gommoll, MS
Forest Laboratories
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2011
First Posted
November 17, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
February 1, 2013
Last Updated
April 3, 2014
Results First Posted
April 3, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-02