NCT01459458

Brief Summary

This is a community-based participatory study to test a brief intervention to reduce risk for intimate partner violence (IPV) and associated unintended pregnancy among young, medically underserved women attending family planning (FP) clinics. Women ages 16-29 years utilizing FP clinics report higher rates of IPV compared to their same-age peers, experiences associated with unintended pregnancy. A critical mechanism connecting IPV with poor reproductive health is abusive partners' control of women's reproduction through condom refusal, pressuring women to get pregnant, and birth control sabotage, a phenomenon described as reproductive coercion. In the investigative team's pilot intervention study 53% of young women using FP clinics reported ever experiencing IPV, and 25% reported reproductive coercion, the combination of which was strongly associated with unintended pregnancy. The proposed reproductive coercion/partner violence intervention was developed collaboratively by community-based practitioners, advocates, and researchers, with significant input from FP clients. Designed to be implemented within routine FP care, maximizing feasibility and sustainability of this program, the intervention provides 1) client education and assessment regarding IPV and reproductive coercion; 2) discussion of harm reduction behaviors to reduce risk for unintended pregnancy and IPV victimization, and 3) supported referrals to IPV victim services. This is a full-scale RCT to assess the effects of this innovative program on IPV, reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancy, major health threats for medically underserved women. Evaluation of this intervention will involve random assignment of 25 FP clinics (unit of randomization) in Western PA to either intervention or control (i.e., standard-of-care) conditions. Female FP clients ages 16-29 (N=3600) will be assessed at baseline, 12-20 weeks (FU1), and 12 months (FU2) to assess intervention effects on knowledge and behaviors related to IPV, reproductive coercion and related harm reduction, as well as unintended pregnancy. Data will be collected via audio computer-assisted self-interview in English or Spanish. Chart extraction will track clinic utilization, pregnancy testing, and diagnosed pregnancies. Regression models appropriate for longitudinal data from cluster-randomized trials will be used to estimate intervention effects.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
3,687

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2011

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2011

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 10, 2011

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 25, 2011

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2014

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

December 2, 2015

Status Verified

November 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

October 10, 2011

Last Update Submit

November 30, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

intimate partner violencegender-based violencedomestic violenceunintended pregnancy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in partner violence victimization (summary score)

    baseline-adjusted differences in post-intervention partner violence victimization up to 12 months {pooled analysis of FU 1 (12-20 weeks) and FU 2 (12 month) score}

    baseline to 12 months

  • Change in reproductive coercion (summary score)

    baseline-adjusted differences in post-intervention levels of reproductive coercion up to 12 months {pooled analysis of FU 1 (12-20 weeks) and FU 2 (12 month) score}

    baseline to12 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Unintended pregnancy

    12 months

  • Change in recognition of abusive behaviors (mean score)

    baseline to 12 months

  • Change in harm reduction self-efficacy (mean score)

    baseline to 12 months

  • Knowledge regarding violence victimization resources

    up to 12 months

  • Harm reduction strategies uptake (summary score)

    up to 12 months

Study Arms (2)

Clinics trained in brief intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Female clients ages 16-29 seeking care in 11 reproductive health clinics in Western Pennsylvania where clinic providers are trained to implement the brief partner violence/reproductive coercion intervention.

Behavioral: Family Planning-based Partner Violence Intervention

Control sites providing standard of care

NO INTERVENTION

Female clients ages 16-29 seeking care in 14 reproductive health clinics in Western Pennsylvania where clinic providers are providing standard domestic violence screening per usual standard of care.

Interventions

The intervention includes three major components: 1. Enhanced Screening and Education: scripted questions to assess for reproductive coercion and pregnancy risk combined with intimate partner violence (IPV) assessment and education regarding how IPV may affect women's reproductive health with the assistance of a safety/educational card created for this intervention. 2. Harm Reduction Counseling: assisting clients in identifying and planning strategies to reduce their risk for future unintended pregnancies and IPV. 3. Supported Referral: educating all clients regarding local resources for victims of IPV and problem-solving regarding barriers to acquisition of these resources as needed.

Clinics trained in brief intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years - 29 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • female clients
  • ages 16-29
  • English or Spanish speaking
  • able to provide their own consent
  • plan to be in area for the next 12 months
  • willing to be contacted for follow up survey and able to provide additional contact information

You may not qualify if:

  • female clients not of the specified age range
  • neither English nor Spanish speaking
  • clients who are intoxicated or otherwise not able to provide their own consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Western Pennsylvania Family Planning Clinics

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Kalra N, Hooker L, Reisenhofer S, Di Tanna GL, Garcia-Moreno C. Training healthcare providers to respond to intimate partner violence against women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 31;5(5):CD012423. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012423.pub2.

  • Hill AL, Miller E, Borrero S, Zelazny S, Miller-Walfish S, Talis J, Switzer GE, Abebe KZ, Chang JC. Family Planning Providers' Assessment of Intimate Partner Violence and Substance Use. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Sep;30(9):1225-1232. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8699. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

  • Miller E, Tancredi DJ, Decker MR, McCauley HL, Jones KA, Anderson H, James L, Silverman JG. A family planning clinic-based intervention to address reproductive coercion: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2016 Jul;94(1):58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 15.

  • Tancredi DJ, Silverman JG, Decker MR, McCauley HL, Anderson HA, Jones KA, Ciaravino S, Hicks A, Raible C, Zelazny S, James L, Miller E. Cluster randomized controlled trial protocol: addressing reproductive coercion in health settings (ARCHES). BMC Womens Health. 2015 Aug 6;15:57. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0216-z.

  • Miller E, McCauley HL, Tancredi DJ, Decker MR, Anderson H, Silverman JG. Recent reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancy among female family planning clients. Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Dec 10.

Study Officials

  • Elizabeth Miller, M.D., Ph.D.

    University of Pittsburgh

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief of Adolescent Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2011

First Posted

October 25, 2011

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion

February 1, 2014

Study Completion

September 1, 2015

Last Updated

December 2, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-11

Locations