Tailored Intervention to Promote Positive Airway Pressure Adherence
SCIP-PA
Phase I Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial: Sociocultural and Cognitive Perception Intervention to Promote Positive Airway Pressure Adherence
2 other identifiers
interventional
118
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of a tailored (i.e., individualized) intervention to promote adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP) in adults with newly-diagnosed, CPAP treated, obstructive sleep apnea.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Nov 2011
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 12, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 23, 2016
CompletedNovember 23, 2016
September 1, 2016
2.3 years
October 12, 2011
August 5, 2016
September 30, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Nightly CPAP Use
Mean CPAP use, hrs/night
1 week
Nightly CPAP Use
Mean CPAP use, hrs/night
1 month
Nightly CPAP Use
Mean CPAP use, hrs/night
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Proportion of Sleep Time on CPAP
1 week
Proportion of Participants Who Complete Protocol After Allocation
Duration of protocol period
Proportion of Participants Who Withdrawal
Duration of protocol period
Acceptability of Study Intervention and Comparative Group
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Tailored
EXPERIMENTALTailored, or individualized, intervention addressing patient education, skills training, and cognitive perceptions
Usual care
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe comparison group, usual care, includes the standard of care delivered to all newly-diagnosed OSA persons proceeding to CPAP treatment
Interventions
Individualized on critical indicator (Self-efficacy measure in Sleep Apnea) measured at each intervention delivery period (pre-diagnosis, immediately post-diagnosis, post-CPAP titration, and during week 1 of home CPAP treatment. Intervention components include patient education, preparatory skills training, modification of inaccurate/unrealistic cognitive perceptions of risk, outcome expectations, and treatment self-efficacy
Usual care comparison group will proceed from initial clinical evaluation for OSA, diagnosis by polysomnography, CPAP titration polysomnography, and home CPAP treatment initiation as per current standard of care
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- males and females \>/= 18 years of age
- newly diagnosed with apnea/hypopnea index \>/= 10 events/hr
- CPAP naive
- able to read and speak English
You may not qualify if:
- previous diagnosis and/or treatment of OSA
- major new psychiatric diagnosis within 6 months of study enrollment
- require supplemental oxygen or bilevel positive airway pressure on CPAP titration polysomnogram
- diagnosis of co-existent sleep disorder on polysomnogram, including periodic limb movements \>/= 10 events/hr with arousal, central sleep apnea with \>/= 5 central events/hr, insomnia, sleep hypoventilation syndrome, or narcolepsy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Centerlead
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)collaborator
- ANFcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Penn State Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
Related Publications (5)
Sawyer AM, Deatrick JA, Kuna ST, Weaver TE. Differences in perceptions of the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and continuous positive airway pressure therapy among adherers and nonadherers. Qual Health Res. 2010 Jul;20(7):873-92. doi: 10.1177/1049732310365502. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
PMID: 20354236BACKGROUNDSawyer AM, Canamucio A, Moriarty H, Weaver TE, Richards KC, Kuna ST. Do cognitive perceptions influence CPAP use? Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Oct;85(1):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.014. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
PMID: 21071166BACKGROUNDSawyer AM, Gooneratne NS, Marcus CL, Ofer D, Richards KC, Weaver TE. A systematic review of CPAP adherence across age groups: clinical and empiric insights for developing CPAP adherence interventions. Sleep Med Rev. 2011 Dec;15(6):343-56. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
PMID: 21652236BACKGROUNDWeaver TE, Maislin G, Dinges DF, Younger J, Cantor C, McCloskey S, Pack AI. Self-efficacy in sleep apnea: instrument development and patient perceptions of obstructive sleep apnea risk, treatment benefit, and volition to use continuous positive airway pressure. Sleep. 2003 Sep;26(6):727-32. doi: 10.1093/sleep/26.6.727.
PMID: 14572127BACKGROUNDYang H, Watach A, Varrasse M, King TS, Sawyer AM. Clinical Trial Enrollment Enrichment in Resource-Constrained Research Environments: Multivariable Apnea Prediction (MAP) Index in SCIP-PA Trial. J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 Feb 15;14(2):173-181. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6926.
PMID: 29246264DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Sampling bias with convenience sampling leading to relatively few PAP users meeting definition of non-adherence (threshold definition \</= 4hrs/night PAP use); Modest intervention fidelity (i.e., delivery) for telephone-delivered exposure period
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Amy M. Sawyer, PhD
- Organization
- The Pennsylvania State University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amy M Sawyer, PhD
The Pennsylvania State University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 12, 2011
First Posted
October 19, 2011
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 23, 2016
Results First Posted
November 23, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09