Sleep Apnea Treatment With Expiratory Resistance(Provent™)
SATER
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) continues to be the primary therapy prescribed for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Although effective, adherence to CPAP is suboptimal in many patients, making alternative therapies desirable. Recently, a novel device (Provent™) has been developed for the treatment of snoring and OSA. The purpose of the current study is to examine how well the Provent™ device treats OSA with particular attention to the how the it may treat sleep apnea and who may most likely benefit from the use of this treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Jan 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 8, 2013
CompletedJuly 19, 2013
July 1, 2013
1 year
February 2, 2010
September 20, 2012
July 9, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in AHI
The primary outcome was the change in the apnea hypopnea index (AHI). Sleep apnea events are defined as apneas and hypopneas.The AHI is a measure of sleep apnea severity. An AHI \> 5 event/h is considered abnormal. AHI values are typically categorized as 5-15 events/hr = mild; 15-30 events/hr = moderate; and \> 30 events/hr = severe. For this study we compared the change in AHI from the baseline sleep study (No Provent) compared to the treatment night sleep study (on Provent).
Comparisons were made between the 2 nights
Study Arms (1)
Single arm - Sleep apnea
OTHERParticipants with sleep apnea will be recruited for the study. Each participant will undergo 3 sleep studies to assess the effect of the Provent™ device. Participants will only use the device while they are in the sleep laboratory. They will not use the device at home between sleep studies . 1. Baseline sleep study (No device) - Assess the effects of no Provent™ on sleep apnea severity. 2. Treatment sleep study (Provent™ device used) - Assess the effects of Provent™ on sleep apnea severity 3. Physiology sleep study (Provent™ on/off) - Assess the physiological effects of the Provent™ device on breathing during sleep.
Interventions
The patient's sleep apnea severity is determined on this night while using the Provent™ device. The patient only uses the Provent™ device on this night (single night use only).
The patient sleeps for 1 night in the sleep lab to determine their baseline sleep apnea severity without sleeping with the Provent device.
During this sleep study night, the patient is sleeping with a modified Provent™ device that can be turned on and off to assess changes in airflow during the night (single night use only).Provent™ on/off is bracketed in 10 minute intervals during stable stage 2 sleep.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Consenting adults over the age of 18
- Diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea (defined as an RDI \> 5 events per hour \& ≥ 90% of disordered breathing events classified as obstructive)
You may not qualify if:
- Total sleep time from previous sleep study \< 4 hours (240 minutes)
- Severe bilateral nasal obstruction (apparent mouth breathing at rest)
- Documented history of lung diseases, as defined below:
- Daytime hypercapnia (PaCO2 \> 45 mmHg)
- Baseline SaO2 ≤ 92%
- Chronic lung disease except mild intermittent or mild persistent asthma
- Cor pulmonale
- Documented clinical cardiovascular disease, as defined below:
- Myocardial infarction in past 3 months
- Revascularization procedure in past 3 months
- Implanted cardiac pacemaker or ICD
- Unstable arrhythmias
- Congestive heart failure with ejection fraction \< 40%
- Uncontrolled hypertension (BP \> 190/110)
- History of end stage renal disease (on dialysis)
- +13 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins Universitylead
- ResMedcollaborator
- Ventus Medical, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224, United States
Related Publications (1)
Colrain IM, Brooks S, Black J. A pilot evaluation of a nasal expiratory resistance device for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2008 Oct 15;4(5):426-33.
PMID: 18853699BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
* Small sample size and limited power for analysis. * Oral breathing during expiratory nasal resistance (ENR) confounds the mechanism of action.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Susheel Patil
- Organization
- Johns Hopkins University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susheel Patil, MD, PhD
Johns Hopkins University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2010
First Posted
February 3, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2011
Last Updated
July 19, 2013
Results First Posted
July 8, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-07