Prospective Randomized Trial On Radiation Dose Estimates Of CT Angiography In Patients Applying Iterative Image Reconstruction Techniques - The PROTECTION V Study -
PROTECTION-V
1 other identifier
interventional
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare a standard coronary CT angiography scan protocol with conventional image reconstruction with a scan protocol using reduced tube current and a new image reconstruction algorithm. The investigators hypothesize that the image quality of the new scan protocol is not inferior, while radiation dose estimates are reduced by around 30%. Secondary endpoints of the study include quantitative image quality parameters, prevalence of non-diagnostic studies, prevalence of coronary artery plaques and plaque characteristics (calcified, non-calcified, mixed) and prevalence of follow-up examinations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 14, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 18, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedOctober 18, 2011
October 1, 2011
1.2 years
October 14, 2011
October 17, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Image quality
Compared with a conventional scan protocol the use of a new scan protocol using iterative image reconstruction and reduced tube current is associated with a comparable diagnostic image quality, while the radiation dose estimates are significantly reduced.
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Quantitative image quality parameters
1 month
Prevalence of non-diagnostic examinations
1 month
Prevalence of coronary artery plaques
1 month
Prevalence of follow-up examinations
1 month
Radiation dose
1 month
Study Arms (2)
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONConventional coronary CT angiography using standard reconstruction technique (filtered back projection).
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALUsing the new scan protocol with 30 % less tube current and iterative image reconstruction algorithm.
Interventions
Conventional coronary CT angiography using standard reconstruction technique (filtered back projection).
Using the new scan protocol with 30 % less tube current and iterative image reconstruction algorithm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with an indication for a coronary CT angiography (planned evaluation of the coronary arteries)
- signed informed consent
- stable sinus rhythm
- age \> 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- known allergy to contrast agents.
- patients with known coronary artery disease
- pregnancy
- no stable sinus rhythm
- coronary ct examinations not focussing on coronary arteries
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Munich, Bavaria, 80636, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Deseive S, Chen MY, Korosoglou G, Leipsic J, Martuscelli E, Carrascosa P, Mirsadraee S, White C, Hadamitzky M, Martinoff S, Menges AL, Bischoff B, Massberg S, Hausleiter J. Prospective Randomized Trial on Radiation Dose Estimates of CT Angiography Applying Iterative Image Reconstruction: The PROTECTION V Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Aug;8(8):888-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.02.024. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
PMID: 26189118DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joerg Hausleiter, MD
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 14, 2011
First Posted
October 18, 2011
Study Start
October 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
October 18, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-10