Xenetix® 350: Comparative Assessment of Image Quality for Coronary CT Angiography
X-ACT
1 other identifier
interventional
468
5 countries
23
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the (statistical) non-inferiority of iobitridol (Xenetix® 350) when compared to contrast agents with higher iodine concentrations, iopromide (Ultravist® 370) and iomeprol (Iomeron® 400) in terms of coronary CT scan evaluability (quality and interpretability of images).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease
Started Nov 2010
23 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 7, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 16, 2015
CompletedDecember 16, 2015
November 1, 2015
1.8 years
December 3, 2010
August 27, 2015
November 12, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of Patients With Evaluable CT Scans i.e. Allowing Identification of Coronary Artery Stenosis According to Off-site Reading Assessment
Evaluability was based upon the off-site assessment of 18-coronary segments graded for image quality with a 5-point scale.4= Excellent quality, fully confidence without any doubts concerning the presence/absence of luminal stenosis; 3= Good quality, confidence concerning the presence/absence of luminal stenosis; 2= Moderate quality, relative confidence, with minor doubts concerning the presence/absence of luminal stenosis; 1= Poor quality, some doubts concerning the presence/absence of stenosis; 0= Non diagnostic. A patient's CT scan was considered as evaluable for identification of coronary artery stenosis if none of the 18 coronary segments had a score of 0.
< 24h
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Average Image Quality According to Off-site Reading
<24h
Coronary Track Rate
<24h
Average Signal Attenuation After IV Injection of Contrast
<1h
Average Signal-to-Noise Ratio (Average SNR)
<1h
Average Contrast-to-noise Ratio (Average CNR)
<1h
Study Arms (3)
Iobitridol
EXPERIMENTALPatients were IV injected with a single dose of iobitridol before a coronary CT angiography
Iopromide
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients were IV injected with a single dose of iopromide before a coronary CT angiography
Iomeprol
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients were IV injected with a single dose of iomeprol before a coronary CT angiography
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female adult patient (having reached legal majority age)
- Symptomatic patient suspected for coronary artery disease scheduled for a coronary CT angiography
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with a heart rate \> 65 beats per minute (bpm) and contraindication or intolerance to b-blocker administration
- Patient with arrhythmia or non-sinus rhythm
- Patient with decompensated heart failure
- Patient with evidence of ongoing or active clinical instability (suspected or known acute myocardial infarction, cardiac shock, acute pulmonary oedema)
- Patient who has previously undergone coronary artery bypass graft
- Patient who has previously undergone percutaneous transluminal coronary stent placement
- Patient with artificial heart valve
- Patient with known moderate to severe aortic stenosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Guerbetlead
Study Sites (23)
CHU Angers
Angers, 49033, France
CHU de la Cavale Blanche
Brest, 29609, France
Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue
Le Plessis-Robinson, 92350, France
La Timone Adultes
Marseille, 13385, France
Hopital Cochin
Paris, 75014, France
Haut-Lévêque / Radiologie
Pessac, 33604, France
CHU Pontchaillou
Rennes, 35033, France
CHU Rouen - Hopital Charles Nicolle
Rouen, 76031, France
Centre Cardiologique du Nord
Saint-Denis, 93207, France
Institut für Radiologie Universitätsklinikum Charité
Berlin, 10117, Germany
University Hospital Erlangen
Erlangen, 191054, Germany
Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Hospital
Essen, 45138, Germany
University Hospital Mannheim
Mannheim, 368167, Germany
University Hospital LMU
Munich, 81377, Germany
Universitätsklinik Ulm
Ulm, 89081, Germany
Ospedale A.Perrino U.O. di radiodiagnostica
Brindisi, Italy
Ospedale del Delta
Ferrara, Italy
Sapienza-universita di Roma
Rome, Italy
Ospedale civile Maggiore du Verona Borgo
Verona, 37126, Italy
Hospital Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Clinico San Carlos
Madrid, 28040, Spain
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela
Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Institut für Radiologie
Sankt Gallen, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The main limitation of the study is the absence of gold standard such as conventional angiography to confirm the readers' assessments. Diagnostic accuracy could therefore not be compared.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Prof. Dr. med. Martin HOFFMANN
- Organization
- Section Head Interventional and Cardiac Radiology - Kantonsspital Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, 6006 Lucerne, Switzerland
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martin HOFFMANN, MD
Kantonsspital Lucerne- Switzerland
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2010
First Posted
December 7, 2010
Study Start
November 1, 2010
Primary Completion
September 1, 2012
Study Completion
September 1, 2012
Last Updated
December 16, 2015
Results First Posted
December 16, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11