NCT01255722

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the (statistical) non-inferiority of iobitridol (Xenetix® 350) when compared to contrast agents with higher iodine concentrations, iopromide (Ultravist® 370) and iomeprol (Iomeron® 400) in terms of coronary CT scan evaluability (quality and interpretability of images).

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
468

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2010

Geographic Reach
5 countries

23 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 3, 2010

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 7, 2010

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2012

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 16, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

December 16, 2015

Status Verified

November 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

December 3, 2010

Results QC Date

August 27, 2015

Last Update Submit

November 12, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

iodinated contrast media, coronary artery disease

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rate of Patients With Evaluable CT Scans i.e. Allowing Identification of Coronary Artery Stenosis According to Off-site Reading Assessment

    Evaluability was based upon the off-site assessment of 18-coronary segments graded for image quality with a 5-point scale.4= Excellent quality, fully confidence without any doubts concerning the presence/absence of luminal stenosis; 3= Good quality, confidence concerning the presence/absence of luminal stenosis; 2= Moderate quality, relative confidence, with minor doubts concerning the presence/absence of luminal stenosis; 1= Poor quality, some doubts concerning the presence/absence of stenosis; 0= Non diagnostic. A patient's CT scan was considered as evaluable for identification of coronary artery stenosis if none of the 18 coronary segments had a score of 0.

    < 24h

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Average Image Quality According to Off-site Reading

    <24h

  • Coronary Track Rate

    <24h

  • Average Signal Attenuation After IV Injection of Contrast

    <1h

  • Average Signal-to-Noise Ratio (Average SNR)

    <1h

  • Average Contrast-to-noise Ratio (Average CNR)

    <1h

Study Arms (3)

Iobitridol

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients were IV injected with a single dose of iobitridol before a coronary CT angiography

Drug: iobitridol

Iopromide

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients were IV injected with a single dose of iopromide before a coronary CT angiography

Drug: iopromide

Iomeprol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients were IV injected with a single dose of iomeprol before a coronary CT angiography

Drug: iomeprol

Interventions

single IV injection

Also known as: Xenetix®
Iobitridol

Single IV injection

Also known as: Ultravist®
Iopromide

Single IV injection

Also known as: Iomeron®
Iomeprol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female adult patient (having reached legal majority age)
  • Symptomatic patient suspected for coronary artery disease scheduled for a coronary CT angiography

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient with a heart rate \> 65 beats per minute (bpm) and contraindication or intolerance to b-blocker administration
  • Patient with arrhythmia or non-sinus rhythm
  • Patient with decompensated heart failure
  • Patient with evidence of ongoing or active clinical instability (suspected or known acute myocardial infarction, cardiac shock, acute pulmonary oedema)
  • Patient who has previously undergone coronary artery bypass graft
  • Patient who has previously undergone percutaneous transluminal coronary stent placement
  • Patient with artificial heart valve
  • Patient with known moderate to severe aortic stenosis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (23)

CHU Angers

Angers, 49033, France

Location

CHU de la Cavale Blanche

Brest, 29609, France

Location

Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue

Le Plessis-Robinson, 92350, France

Location

La Timone Adultes

Marseille, 13385, France

Location

Hopital Cochin

Paris, 75014, France

Location

Haut-Lévêque / Radiologie

Pessac, 33604, France

Location

CHU Pontchaillou

Rennes, 35033, France

Location

CHU Rouen - Hopital Charles Nicolle

Rouen, 76031, France

Location

Centre Cardiologique du Nord

Saint-Denis, 93207, France

Location

Institut für Radiologie Universitätsklinikum Charité

Berlin, 10117, Germany

Location

University Hospital Erlangen

Erlangen, 191054, Germany

Location

Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Hospital

Essen, 45138, Germany

Location

University Hospital Mannheim

Mannheim, 368167, Germany

Location

University Hospital LMU

Munich, 81377, Germany

Location

Universitätsklinik Ulm

Ulm, 89081, Germany

Location

Ospedale A.Perrino U.O. di radiodiagnostica

Brindisi, Italy

Location

Ospedale del Delta

Ferrara, Italy

Location

Sapienza-universita di Roma

Rome, Italy

Location

Ospedale civile Maggiore du Verona Borgo

Verona, 37126, Italy

Location

Hospital Vall d'Hebron

Barcelona, Spain

Location

Hospital Clinico San Carlos

Madrid, 28040, Spain

Location

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela

Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Location

Institut für Radiologie

Sankt Gallen, Switzerland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Interventions

iobitridoliopromideiomeprol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

The main limitation of the study is the absence of gold standard such as conventional angiography to confirm the readers' assessments. Diagnostic accuracy could therefore not be compared.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Prof. Dr. med. Martin HOFFMANN
Organization
Section Head Interventional and Cardiac Radiology - Kantonsspital Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, 6006 Lucerne, Switzerland

Study Officials

  • Martin HOFFMANN, MD

    Kantonsspital Lucerne- Switzerland

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2010

First Posted

December 7, 2010

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion

September 1, 2012

Study Completion

September 1, 2012

Last Updated

December 16, 2015

Results First Posted

December 16, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-11

Locations