New Fabric Attenuation Device in Endovascular Interventional Radiology (PREFER)
PREFER
Prospective Randomized Evaluation of a New Fabric Attenuation Device in Endovascular Interventional Radiology (PREFER)
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The PREFER Trial primary objective of the trial is to show how much radiation attenuation is provided by XPF in absolute and relative terms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Sep 2011
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 13, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedSeptember 25, 2014
September 1, 2014
2 months
September 28, 2011
September 23, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Radiation attenuation in percentage (%) and in absolute terms (μSv/min)
The null hypothesis is that the XPF thyroid collar is inferior to the standard 0.5mm Pb lead equivalent thyroid collar with regard to radiation attenuation/transmission. The alternative hypothesis is that the XPF thyroid collar is non-inferior to the standard thyroid collar. If there is truly no difference between standard and XPF thyroid collars, then 60 patients are required to be 95% sure that the lower limit of a one-sided 95% confidence interval (or equivalently a 90% two-sided confidence interval) will be above the non-inferiority limit of -0.7% transmission rate and -0.013 μSv/min.
The attenuation is assessed directly after each procedure (day 1)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Wearing comfort of the XPF cap and collar on a scale from 0-100.
(day 1) Operators are asked directly after each procedure to rate the wearing comfort
Study Arms (1)
Interventional Radiologists
All operators are Interventional Radiologists and co-investigators. Prior to start of the study, all operators are asked to provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
Eligibility Criteria
All operators are Interventional Radiologists and Co-Investigators. Prior to start of the study, all operators are asked to provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
You may qualify if:
- Interventional Radiologists practicing in Baptist Cardiac \& Vascular Institute
- consecutive endovascular procedure requiring C-arm fluoroscopy
You may not qualify if:
- Interventional Neuroradiologists and Interventional Cardiologists will not be included in this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Baptist Hospital of Miami, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute
Miami, Florida, 33176, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Barry T. Katzen, MD
Baptist Hospital of Miami and its Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Heiko Uthoff, MD
Baptist Hospital of Miami and its Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Division of Clinical Research & Outcomes
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2011
First Posted
October 13, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
November 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
September 25, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-09