NCT01444573

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesized that very lenient rate control is not inferior to strict or lenient rate control assessed by implantable continuous ECG monitor for preventing cardiovascular hospitalization and mortality in patients with long-standing persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 atrial-fibrillation

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2011

Typical duration for phase_3 atrial-fibrillation

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2011

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 29, 2011

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 30, 2011

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2012

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

September 23, 2015

Status Verified

September 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

September 29, 2011

Last Update Submit

September 21, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Rate controlILR

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Hospitalization for all cardio-vascular events

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • All-cause death

    12 months

  • stroke

    12 months

  • life-threatening arrhythmic and drugs adverse events

    12 months

Study Arms (2)

Group 2 (Lenient control <120bpm)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: implantable continuous monitor

Group 1 (Strict control <80 bpm)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: implantable continuous monitor

Interventions

The Reveal XT was implanted in the parasternal area of the chest. The requirement for defining the exact final position was an R-wave amplitude ≥0.4 mV assessed through the Vector Check.

Also known as: Reveal XT, implantable loop recorder
Group 1 (Strict control <80 bpm)Group 2 (Lenient control <120bpm)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Long-standing persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation
  • Mean resting heart rate \> 80 beats per minute with or without rate control medication
  • Age \< 70 years old
  • Constant use of anticoagulation therapy

You may not qualify if:

  • Paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation
  • Non-stable heart failure or \> III NYHA FC
  • Indications for IPG/CRT/ICD
  • Thyroid dysfunction
  • Inability to walk or bike.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

State Research Institute of CIrculation Pathology Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

Novosibirsk, 630055, Russia

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Evgeny A Pokushalov, MD, PhD

    State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
NETWORK
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2011

First Posted

September 30, 2011

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion

December 1, 2012

Study Completion

September 1, 2015

Last Updated

September 23, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-09

Locations