Sequential Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and Electromotive Mitomycin-C Versus Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Alone for High Risk Superficial Bladder Cancer
BCG/EMDA-MMC
1 other identifier
interventional
212
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Intravesical treatment for superficial bladder cancer has been used for the past 4-5 decades. Intravesical chemotherapy is beneficial in terms of recurrence and time to recurrence in grade 1-2 stage Ta tumours, usually non-invasive. Intravesical chemotherapy has negligible effect on disease progression in high-risk superficial bladder cancer-ie, grade 3, stage T1, and carcinoma in situ. However, BCG as induction and maintenance treatment effectively delays progression. Electromotive mitomycin increases tissue uptake compared with that of passive diffusion. Electromotive mitomycin has emerged as an alternative or complementary treatment to BCG. The rationale for combining anticancer drugs is based on the need to increase efficacy and reduce emergence of resistant malignant cells. This approach is not frequently applied to use of intravesical agents for treatment of superficial bladder cancer, for which immunotherapeutic BCG and chemotherapeutic mitomycin seem to be a potentially effective combination. Studies have addressed concurrent use of mitomycin and BCG, and assigned two roles to mitomycin: antitumor action and tissue-scarifying (ie, surface-modifying) effect that enables BCG to attach more efficiently to the urothelium. The investigators therefore aimed to assess whether induction of inflammation by use of BCG before mitomycin treatment makes the bladder mucosa more permeable and thus enables mitomycin to reach the target more easily. This randomised trial to compare the efficacy of sequential BCG and electromotive mitomycin with that of the current standard of BCG alone for patients with high-risk superficial bladder cancer. After transurethral resection and multiple biopsies patients with stage pT1 bladder cancer are randomly assigned to: 81 mg BCG infused over 120 min once a week for 6 weeks; or to 81 mg BCG infused over 120 min once a week for 2 weeks, followed by 40 mg electromotive mitomycin (intravesical electric current 20 mA for 30 min) once a week as one cycle for three cycles (n=107). Complete responders underwent maintenance treatment: those assigned BCG alone had one infusion of 81 mg BCG once a month for 10 months, and those assigned BCG and mitomycin had 40 mg electromotive mitomycin once a month for 2 months, followed by 81 mg BCG once a month as one cycle for three cycles. The primary endpoint was disease-free interval; secondary endpoints were time to progression; overall survival; and disease-specific survival. Analyses were intention to treat.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jan 1994
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 1994
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2002
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2002
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 29, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2011
CompletedSeptember 28, 2011
September 1, 2011
8.4 years
July 29, 2011
September 27, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Disease-free interval
The primary endpoint is disease-free interval for patients without carcinoma in situ and for patients with carcinoma in situ who are disease-free after treatment-ie, time from randomisation to first cystoscopy noting recurrence. Patients with carcinoma in situ who did not have complete response after 3 months of treatment are regarded as having recurrence with no follow-up.
From date of randomization until the date of first documented recurrence, assessed up to 120 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Time to progression
From date of randomization until the date of documented progression, assessed up to 120 months.
Overall survival
From date of randomization until the date of death for any cause, assessed up to 120 months.
Disease-specific survival
From date of randomization until the date of death for bladder cancer, assessed up to 120 months.
Study Arms (2)
Intravesical BCG alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntravesical sequential BCG and EMDA MMC
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
The BCG instillation consisted of 81 mg wet weight (10•2±9•0\_108 colony-forming units) BCG Connaught substrain (ImmuCyst®, Alfa Wassermann SpA, Bologna, Italy). Lyophilised (ie, freeze-dried) BCG is suspended in 50 mL bacteriostatic-free solution of 0•9% sodium chloride. After draining of the bladder, the suspension is infused intravesically through a Foley catheter. The solution is retained in the bladder for 120 min, followed by emptying of the bladder and removal of the catheter. The BCG-alone group is assigned one course of intravesical treatment per week for 6 weeks. Patients in the BCG-alone group who are disease-free 3 months after treatment are scheduled to receive monthly infusions of BCG for 10 months
BCG instillation of 81 mg BCG Connaught-substrain, suspended in 50 mL bacteriostatic-free saline solution, retained for 120 min. Electromotive instillation: 40 mg mitomycin in 100 mL water infused intravesically and retained in the bladder for 30 min, while 20 mA for 30 min pulsed electric current is given externally. Patients assigned sequential BCG and EMDA MMC are assigned 1 course of treatment/week for 9 weeks: one cycle consisted of two BCG infusions and one mitomycin infusion (three cycles in total). Patients in the BCG-and-mitomycin group who are disease-free 3 months after treatment are scheduled to receive one infusion a month for 9 months: three cycles of mitomycin, mitomycin, and BCG (ie, six infusions of MMC and three of BCG).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adequate bone-marrow reserve (ie, white-blood-cell count ≥4000 x106 cells/L and platelet count ≥120 x 109/L)
- normal renal function (ie, serum creatinine ≤123•76 μmol/L)
- normal liver function (ie, serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase ≤42 U/L, serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase ≤48 U/L, and total bilirubin ≤22•23 μmol/L)
- Karnofsky performance status between 50 and 100.
You may not qualify if:
- previous treatment with BCG or electromotive mitomycin
- treatment with any other intravesical cytostatic agent within the past 6 months
- concomitant urothelial tumours of the upper urinary tract;
- previous muscle-invasive (ie, stage T2 or higher) transitional-cell - carcinoma of the bladder
- bladder capacity less than 2 L
- untreated urinary-tract infection
- severe systemic infection (ie, sepsis)
- urethral strictures that would prevent endoscopic procedures and repeated catheterisation
- disease of upper urinary tract (eg, vesicoureteral reflux or urinary-tract stones) that would make multiple transurethral procedures a risk
- previous radiotherapy to the pelvis
- other concurrent chemotherapy
- treatment with radiotherapy-response or biological-response modifiers;
- history of tuberculosis
- other malignant diseases within 5 years of trial registration (except for basal-cell carcinoma)
- pregnancy or nursing
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Rome Tor Vergatalead
- University of L'Aquilacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Dept. of Surgery/Urology, Tor Vergata University
Rome, RM, 00133, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Giurioli A, Valenti M, Zampa G, Storti L, Attisani F, De Carolis A, Capelli G, Vespasiani G, Stephen RL. Sequential BCG and electromotive mitomycin versus BCG alone for high-risk superficial bladder cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006 Jan;7(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70472-1.
PMID: 16389183RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Savino M Di Stasi, MD, PhD
Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 29, 2011
First Posted
September 28, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 1994
Primary Completion
June 1, 2002
Study Completion
June 1, 2002
Last Updated
September 28, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-09