Comparing the Reliability of Expressed Prostatic Secretion (EPS) and Post Massage Urine (PMU) for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer Biopsy Outcome
2 other identifiers
interventional
243
1 country
5
Brief Summary
This randomized pilot phase I trial studies the best way, either expressed prostatic secretion (EPS) or post massage urine (PMU) biomarkers, of predicting biopsy results in patients undergoing prostate biopsy. Studying samples of urine in the laboratory may help doctors detect prostate cancer. It is not yet known whether EPS or PMU biomarkers are more effective in predicting prostate biopsy results
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 14, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 3, 2027
ExpectedMarch 23, 2026
March 1, 2026
7 years
September 23, 2011
March 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Determine whether EPS or PMU is a better predictor of prostate cancer biopsy results by measuring and comparing the number of prostatic cells collected
Compare assay results in 300 EPS specimens with those from 300 PMU specimens. The gold standard for assay validity is the biopsy result.
1 month after sample collection
Comparison of the area under the curve (AUC) for sensitivity and specificity of TMPRSS2:ERG single and double fusion assays and biopsy results in patients with prostate cancer, undergoing prostate screening
Perform TMPRSS2:ERG type III and TMPRSS2:ERG type IV assays on each specimen. The gold standard for assay validity is the biopsy result.
1 month after sample collection
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Comparison of the AUC for sensitivity and specificity of the methylation status of the androgen receptor (AR) and GSTP1 promoter, APC and RARB and biopsy results in men with prostate cancer, undergoing prostate screening
1 month after sample collection
Determine by comparison of AUCs which combination of molecular markers offers the greatest improvements in our ability to predict biopsy outcome over current baseline predictors (serum PSA and DRE)
1 month after sample collection
Comparison through the AUCs of the association of EPS or PMU TMPRSS2:ERG fusion assay and methylation of the GSTP1 promoter, APC, RARB assays and PCA3 to the results of TRUSP and biopsy in men with unknown prostate cancer status
1 month after sample collection
Study Arms (2)
Arm I (PMU)
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive digital rectal palpation and then void a spontaneous urine sample for PMU analysis. Patients then undergo a prostate biopsy.
Arm II (EPS)
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive DRE with prostatic massage for 30-60 seconds and are then milked at the urethra to provide a collection of EPS. Patients then undergo a prostate biopsy.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All men who will be undergoing transrectal ultrasound of the prostate (TRUSP) with biopsy in the department of Urology or participating urology clinics for the evaluation of prostate cancer
You may not qualify if:
- Men with a previous diagnosis of prostate cancer
- Men without a prior diagnosis of prostate cancer but who have previously undergone a biopsy for a suspicious DRE or PSA
- Men with a prior diagnosis of cancer \< 5 years ago, excluding basal cell carcinoma and/or squamous cell carcinoma
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- City of Hope Medical Centerlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (5)
Chinn & Chinn Urology Associates, Inc.
Arcadia, California, 91006, United States
City of Hope Medical Center
Duarte, California, 91010, United States
Citrus Valley Urologic Medical Group
Glendora, California, 91741, United States
Dr. Felix Chi-Ming Yip
Monterey Park, California, 91754, United States
City of Hope- South Pasadena Cancer Center
South Pasadena, California, 91030, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven Smith, PhD
City of Hope Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2011
First Posted
September 28, 2011
Study Start
July 14, 2009
Primary Completion
June 30, 2016
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 3, 2027
Last Updated
March 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03