ScopeGuide-assisted Colonoscopy Versus Conventional Colonoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
250
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Colonoscopy is an established technology that enables doctors to obtain live video from inside patients' large intestines, which is essential for the diagnosis of numerous intestinal illnesses. It consists of a long, flexible tube fitted with a light-source and small video camera that transmits the images onto a display monitor. The doctor inserts the scope into the anus, moves it into the rectum and then guides it slowly through the entire colon. Because of the various twists and turns that are part of normal bowel anatomy, advancing the scope through the entire colon is not always successful and can become challenging when the scope forms loops inside the abdomen. Unfortunately, there is no way for the doctor to see the shape of the scope inside the body other than what is seen from the video at its front end, and so navigating the colon relies on instinct accumulated with experience and the "feel" of the scope as loops begin to form. This is important because not only can this loop formation cause pain, but it can also increase the likelihood of an incomplete test. Incomplete tests matter because a major reason for performing colonoscopy is colon cancer screening and surveillance; detecting early cancers at treatable stages and looking for polyps that may be pre-cancerous growths. When colonoscopy does not advance through the entire colon, parts are left unexamined where cancer may develop. A new technology called "ScopeGuide" has been developed that uses magnetic coils embedded within the scope to create a 3D image of the shape of the entire scope inside the body that is projected onto the monitor for the doctor to see. This will show if loops are forming and will provide information about how to eliminate loops once they have formed. In this research study, the investigators will compare colonoscopy with the assistance of ScopeGuide to colonoscopy performed in the standard fashion, to see if ScopeGuide results in more successful procedures that are easier for the doctor and more comfortable for patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedJanuary 17, 2013
January 1, 2013
1.1 years
September 14, 2011
January 16, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sedation Score
The main efficacy parameter is the amount of sedation used during colonoscopy, expressed as the mean for each group. Since our conscious sedation consists of two different drugs, the doses of each will be converted into a numerical score, such that typical 1 mg dose increments of midazolam and 25 mcg increments of fentanyl will each be assigned a score of '1,' and the two will be added together to give the sedation score.
1 day (immediate outcome assessment at time of endoscopy procedure)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Patient comfort
1 day (immediate outcome assessment after recovery from endoscopy procedure)
Time-to-cecum
1 day (immediate outcome assessment at time of endoscopy procedure)
Cecal intubation rate
1 day (immediate outcome assessment at time of endoscopy procedure)
Ancillary maneuvers to facilitate procedure
1 day (immediate outcome assessment at time of endoscopy procedure)
Study Arms (2)
ScopeGuide-assisted colonoscopy
EXPERIMENTALThese patients will undergo colonoscopy with the assistance of the Olympus ScopeGuide system.
Conventional colonoscopy
NO INTERVENTIONThese patients will undergo colonoscopy identical to that in the intervention arm, except with endoscopes lacking the ScopeGuide system.
Interventions
ScopeGuide-assisted colonoscopy using Olympus CF-H180DL variable-stiffness colonoscopes equipped with ScopeGuide capabilities. ScopeGuide will provide the endoscopist with a 3-dimensional image on the monitor depicting the shape of the colonoscope inside the patient's body as it moves through the colon.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patient 18 years or older.
- Able to read \& write English.
- Undergoing colonoscopy at University of Alberta Hospital for any indication.
You may not qualify if:
- Colonoscopy performed without prior purgative bowel prep.
- Patient with active, ongoing lower GI bleeding.
- Colonoscopy performed to attempt colonic decompression in acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie's syndrome).
- Colonoscopy for which propofol sedation is required.
- Inpatient colonoscopy performed by a trainee under staff supervision.
- Patient with previous colonic surgery.
- Patient with pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2X8, Canada
Related Publications (3)
Shah SG, Brooker JC, Williams CB, Thapar C, Saunders BP. Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000 Nov 18;356(9243):1718-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03205-0.
PMID: 11095259BACKGROUNDShah SG, Brooker JC, Thapar C, Suzuki N, Williams CB, Saunders BP. Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on patient tolerance and sedation requirements during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jun;55(7):832-7. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.124097.
PMID: 12024136BACKGROUNDTeshima CW, Zepeda-Gomez S, AlShankiti SH, Sandha GS. Magnetic imaging-assisted colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep 28;20(36):13178-84. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13178.
PMID: 25278714DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher W Teshima, MD FRCPC
University of Alberta
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2011
First Posted
September 22, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
October 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
January 17, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-01