NCT01438645

Brief Summary

Colonoscopy is an established technology that enables doctors to obtain live video from inside patients' large intestines, which is essential for the diagnosis of numerous intestinal illnesses. It consists of a long, flexible tube fitted with a light-source and small video camera that transmits the images onto a display monitor. The doctor inserts the scope into the anus, moves it into the rectum and then guides it slowly through the entire colon. Because of the various twists and turns that are part of normal bowel anatomy, advancing the scope through the entire colon is not always successful and can become challenging when the scope forms loops inside the abdomen. Unfortunately, there is no way for the doctor to see the shape of the scope inside the body other than what is seen from the video at its front end, and so navigating the colon relies on instinct accumulated with experience and the "feel" of the scope as loops begin to form. This is important because not only can this loop formation cause pain, but it can also increase the likelihood of an incomplete test. Incomplete tests matter because a major reason for performing colonoscopy is colon cancer screening and surveillance; detecting early cancers at treatable stages and looking for polyps that may be pre-cancerous growths. When colonoscopy does not advance through the entire colon, parts are left unexamined where cancer may develop. A new technology called "ScopeGuide" has been developed that uses magnetic coils embedded within the scope to create a 3D image of the shape of the entire scope inside the body that is projected onto the monitor for the doctor to see. This will show if loops are forming and will provide information about how to eliminate loops once they have formed. In this research study, the investigators will compare colonoscopy with the assistance of ScopeGuide to colonoscopy performed in the standard fashion, to see if ScopeGuide results in more successful procedures that are easier for the doctor and more comfortable for patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
250

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2011

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2011

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 14, 2011

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 22, 2011

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

January 17, 2013

Status Verified

January 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

September 14, 2011

Last Update Submit

January 16, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

ColonoscopyColon cancer screening

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Sedation Score

    The main efficacy parameter is the amount of sedation used during colonoscopy, expressed as the mean for each group. Since our conscious sedation consists of two different drugs, the doses of each will be converted into a numerical score, such that typical 1 mg dose increments of midazolam and 25 mcg increments of fentanyl will each be assigned a score of '1,' and the two will be added together to give the sedation score.

    1 day (immediate outcome assessment at time of endoscopy procedure)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Patient comfort

    1 day (immediate outcome assessment after recovery from endoscopy procedure)

  • Time-to-cecum

    1 day (immediate outcome assessment at time of endoscopy procedure)

  • Cecal intubation rate

    1 day (immediate outcome assessment at time of endoscopy procedure)

  • Ancillary maneuvers to facilitate procedure

    1 day (immediate outcome assessment at time of endoscopy procedure)

Study Arms (2)

ScopeGuide-assisted colonoscopy

EXPERIMENTAL

These patients will undergo colonoscopy with the assistance of the Olympus ScopeGuide system.

Device: Olympus ScopeGuide

Conventional colonoscopy

NO INTERVENTION

These patients will undergo colonoscopy identical to that in the intervention arm, except with endoscopes lacking the ScopeGuide system.

Interventions

ScopeGuide-assisted colonoscopy using Olympus CF-H180DL variable-stiffness colonoscopes equipped with ScopeGuide capabilities. ScopeGuide will provide the endoscopist with a 3-dimensional image on the monitor depicting the shape of the colonoscope inside the patient's body as it moves through the colon.

Also known as: Magnetic endoscopy imaging
ScopeGuide-assisted colonoscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patient 18 years or older.
  • Able to read \& write English.
  • Undergoing colonoscopy at University of Alberta Hospital for any indication.

You may not qualify if:

  • Colonoscopy performed without prior purgative bowel prep.
  • Patient with active, ongoing lower GI bleeding.
  • Colonoscopy performed to attempt colonic decompression in acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie's syndrome).
  • Colonoscopy for which propofol sedation is required.
  • Inpatient colonoscopy performed by a trainee under staff supervision.
  • Patient with previous colonic surgery.
  • Patient with pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Alberta Hospital

Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2X8, Canada

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Shah SG, Brooker JC, Williams CB, Thapar C, Saunders BP. Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000 Nov 18;356(9243):1718-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03205-0.

    PMID: 11095259BACKGROUND
  • Shah SG, Brooker JC, Thapar C, Suzuki N, Williams CB, Saunders BP. Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on patient tolerance and sedation requirements during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jun;55(7):832-7. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.124097.

    PMID: 12024136BACKGROUND
  • Teshima CW, Zepeda-Gomez S, AlShankiti SH, Sandha GS. Magnetic imaging-assisted colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep 28;20(36):13178-84. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13178.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colonic NeoplasmsAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyDiarrhea

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesAnemia, HypochromicAnemiaHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesIron DeficienciesIron Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesSigns and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Christopher W Teshima, MD FRCPC

    University of Alberta

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2011

First Posted

September 22, 2011

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion

October 1, 2012

Study Completion

December 1, 2012

Last Updated

January 17, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-01

Locations