NCT01675934

Brief Summary

Screening colonoscopy has been shown to be less effective in preventing colorectal cancer in the proximal colon compared to the distal colon. Possible reasons for this include bowel preparation often being worse in the proximal colon as well as flat depressed lesions being more common in the proximal colon. Retroflexion is commonly regarded as standard practice in the rectum, but retroflexion in the proximal colon is not currently routinely performed due to concerns of perforation and possibly because of the increased time required. Proximal colon retroflexion has been shown to be safe and effective without any complications, but data regarding ability to retroflex with certain types of colonoscopes is limited. Endoscopists interchangeably use standard adult colonoscopes or pediatric colonoscopes. Studies have not been performed to comparatively evaluate the success rates of standard adult and pediatric colonoscopes and whether either type of instrument confers a greater polyp detection rate.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2012

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2012

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 28, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 30, 2012

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

January 8, 2016

Status Verified

January 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

August 28, 2012

Last Update Submit

January 6, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of cases in which right-sided retroflexion is successful with the adult and pediatric colonoscopes.

    After 50% and 100% of patient enrollment is complete.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Adenoma detection rate in forward and retroflexed views.

    After 50% and 100% of patient enrollment is complete.

  • Reasons for failure of retroflexion.

    After 50% and 100% of patient enrollment is complete.

Study Arms (2)

Adult colonoscope

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Use of the adult colonoscope.

Procedure: Retroflexion with the adult colonoscope.

Pediatric colonoscope

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Use of the pediatric colonoscope.

Procedure: Retroflexion with the pediatric colonoscope.

Interventions

Pediatric colonoscope

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients over the age 18 undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy

You may not qualify if:

  • Age less than 18
  • Pregnant
  • History of ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease
  • History of polyposis syndromes
  • History of colon resection
  • Colonoscopy being performed for diagnostic purposes (ie. bleeding, abdominal pain, alternating bowel habits)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Froedtert Surgery Center

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colonic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Young Oh, MD

    Medical College of Wisconsin

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2012

First Posted

August 30, 2012

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion

May 1, 2013

Study Completion

May 1, 2013

Last Updated

January 8, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-01

Locations