Study Stopped
PI has left institution
Right-sided Retroflexion With Standard Adult Versus Pediatric Colonoscopes
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Screening colonoscopy has been shown to be less effective in preventing colorectal cancer in the proximal colon compared to the distal colon. Possible reasons for this include bowel preparation often being worse in the proximal colon as well as flat depressed lesions being more common in the proximal colon. Retroflexion is commonly regarded as standard practice in the rectum, but retroflexion in the proximal colon is not currently routinely performed due to concerns of perforation and possibly because of the increased time required. Proximal colon retroflexion has been shown to be safe and effective without any complications, but data regarding ability to retroflex with certain types of colonoscopes is limited. Endoscopists interchangeably use standard adult colonoscopes or pediatric colonoscopes. Studies have not been performed to comparatively evaluate the success rates of standard adult and pediatric colonoscopes and whether either type of instrument confers a greater polyp detection rate.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Feb 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 28, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 30, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedJanuary 8, 2016
January 1, 2016
1.2 years
August 28, 2012
January 6, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of cases in which right-sided retroflexion is successful with the adult and pediatric colonoscopes.
After 50% and 100% of patient enrollment is complete.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Adenoma detection rate in forward and retroflexed views.
After 50% and 100% of patient enrollment is complete.
Reasons for failure of retroflexion.
After 50% and 100% of patient enrollment is complete.
Study Arms (2)
Adult colonoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORUse of the adult colonoscope.
Pediatric colonoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORUse of the pediatric colonoscope.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients over the age 18 undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- Age less than 18
- Pregnant
- History of ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease
- History of polyposis syndromes
- History of colon resection
- Colonoscopy being performed for diagnostic purposes (ie. bleeding, abdominal pain, alternating bowel habits)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Froedtert Surgery Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Young Oh, MD
Medical College of Wisconsin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2012
First Posted
August 30, 2012
Study Start
February 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
January 8, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01