NCT01434264

Brief Summary

Energy healing is among the most commonly used forms of complementary and alternative medicine among cancer patients. There are, however, few studies on the effects of energy healing for cancer and cancer associated symptoms and none of them are of a volume or quality that allows reliable conclusions to be drawn. Qualitative studies on energy healing in Denmark have demonstrated that the interventions are individualized and the expected outcomes personalized. This research points to the need for a research design that can evaluate personalized outcomes of individualized treatments and at the same time adhere to general demands of external and internal validity. The objective of this study is to test the effectiveness of energy healing as an individualized rehabilitative intervention to improve outcomes of personal choice among persons who have completed a conventional intended curative treatment for colorectal, breast and prostate cancer. The study is designed as a pragmatic clinical trial with personalized outcomes. The study attempts to maximize external validity by using a design that incorporates important features of energy healing administered in real-life settings: 1a) allowing participants self-selection to healing and non-healing control, 1b) assessing individual participant-selected treatment goals, 1c) allowing the treatment to be performed in the private clinics of the healers. To maximize internal validity similar to that obtained in a randomized, clinical trial design, the study will 2a) randomize participants to self-selection and randomized groups of intervention and control; and 2b) supplement the assessment of personalized treatment goals with assessment of outcomes with standardized measures. The study will account for a number of possible moderators of the effects, including 3a) socio-demographics and 3b) previous experience with complementary and alternative treatment. Outcome measures will be assessed by questionnaires, physical measurements, data from administrative registries as well as semi-structured interviews and participant observation. Possible patterns in the various forms of data will be examined for concordances and discrepancies. Finally, the methods will be discussed in terms of their generalizability as a model for evaluating personal outcomes of individualized treatments with high levels of external and internal validity.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
247

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2011

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2011

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 13, 2011

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 14, 2011

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

March 10, 2014

Status Verified

March 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

September 13, 2011

Last Update Submit

March 7, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

rehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in personal concerns identified by the patient in the MYCaW questionnaire.

    The primary outcome is to investigate whether "energy healing" as an individualized form of treatment can improve personal concerns identified by the patient in the MYCaW questionnaire.

    Measured 10 days after baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (before third treatment), 10 weeks and 18 weeks after baseline

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Changes in Physical Health Survey

    10 days, 10 weeks and 18 weeks after baseline

  • Changes in SF-36 Physical activity

    10 days, 10 weeks and 18 weeks after baseline

  • Changes in Facit-sp QoL

    Baseline, 10 weeks and 18 weeks after baseline

  • Changes in BDI-II depressive symptoms

    Baseline, 10 weeks and 18 weeks after baseline

  • Changes in POMS Mood

    Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (before and after third treatment), 10 weeks and 18 weeks after baseline

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Self-selected energy healing

EXPERIMENTAL

Self-selected healing in the self-selection arm

Procedure: Energy healing

self-selected control

NO INTERVENTION

Self-selected control in the self-selection arm

randomized to energy healing

EXPERIMENTAL

Randomized to healing in the randomization arm

Procedure: Energy healing

Randomized control

NO INTERVENTION

Randomized to control in the randomization arm

Interventions

"Healer-Ringen", a Danish national association of healers, selects healers with an educational background as required by the Registry of Alternative Practitioners (RAB) and have rooms reserved for the healing practice. The treatment takes place in the clinic of the healer and is not restricted in respect to what form of energy healing that shall be used, provided that it is based on the idea of the healer providing some kind of energy by the hands to the participant. Conversation as usual is accepted, but no other form of therapy may be provided. The intervention consists of four sessions over a period of two months, distributed as decided by each participant-healer pair.

Also known as: Spiritual healing, Reiki
Self-selected energy healingrandomized to energy healing

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Primary diagnosis of colorectal, breast and prostate cancer
  • Completed treatment with intended cure and no current cancer

You may not qualify if:

  • Unwillingness to comply with data collection protocol
  • Mentally and cognitively incapable to participate in the study
  • Poor understanding and expression of the Danish language

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Christina Gundgaard Pedersen

Aarhus, 8000, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Agdal R. "Is the Pain a Sign of Healing?": Cancer Patients' Experiences of Energy Healing in a Pragmatic Trial. Integr Cancer Ther. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15347354221118328. doi: 10.1177/15347354221118328.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Interventions

Spiritual TherapiesTherapeutic Touch

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Complementary TherapiesTherapeuticsMind-Body Therapies

Study Officials

  • Helle Johannessen, PhD

    University of Southern Denmark

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, mag.scient., PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2011

First Posted

September 14, 2011

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion

November 1, 2012

Study Completion

November 1, 2012

Last Updated

March 10, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-03

Locations