Influence of a Brief Intervention on CRC Screening
Hem-FMG
Brief Intervention to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Qualitative data were collected from 5 General Practionners (GPs) focus groups, 24 patient interviews and 35 recorded consultations from 9 GPs to explore colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in France The qualitative data indicated that improvement was needed in patient-centered communication. Educational material was developed based on these triangulated data with two different scenarios to improve communication with patients: one for a compliant patient, another for a non compliant patient The hypothesis is that a brief intervention on GPs can improve the patients' participation rate to colorectal screening Method : cluster randomized control trial (cluster unit : GPs practices) With a brief intervention on a randomized population of GPs in the district of Val d'Oise Inclusion criteria: GPs with a practice in the district of Val d'Oise and active in the colorectal mass screening
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Dec 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2013
CompletedDecember 16, 2013
December 1, 2013
7 months
March 8, 2013
December 10, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
participation rate of patients for CRC screening
Comparison of the participation rate for patients for CRC screening among GPs belonging to the intervention group versus the participation rate for patients for CRC screening among GPs belonging to the control group
7 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
GPs with a participation rate over 65%
7 months
GPs participation rate over 45%
7 months
Study Arms (2)
control group
NO INTERVENTIONGPs from practices in the control group are asked to continue their usual care, as if they were not participating in this trial. They had to send their patients list to the research team to calculate their eligible population. They were also asked to list all the gaiac Fecal occult blood test ( gFOBT) delivered during the six months period of the study.
intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORGPs communication skills and CRC screening :the intervention was a four hours educational training for GPs of the intervention group focused on communication skills with a patients' centered care approach to improve patients participation at CRC screening
Interventions
GPs of the intervention group received a four hours educational training focused on patients' centered care to improve GPs communication skills and enhance patients'participation in CRC mass screening . Triangulation of all qualitative data was performed in order to develop educational material and training based on the six components of the Patient-Centered Clinical Method . Two different scenarios were developed: one for a compliant patient, another for a non-compliant patient. Two videos were made with doctor and simulated patient. Interactive methods were used to elaborate educational training including role playing, the presentation of the video followed by an interactive discussion.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Paris Diderot
Paris, 75018, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Isabelle AUGER, Professor
University Paris Diderot
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2013
First Posted
December 16, 2013
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2012
Study Completion
September 1, 2012
Last Updated
December 16, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-12