Robotic Gait Training VS.Conventional Rehabilitation in SCI
Robotic Gait Training VS. Conventional Physical Therapy in Spinal Cord Injury Patients.
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Until now, there's still no any strong evidence supported "which is the best way to restoration walking ability" in spinal cord injury. Most of the evidence suggest that, there is somehow better after gait rehabilitation for ASIA classification C and D but not improved walking ability for ASIA classification A and B. There is an RCT showed the evidence of repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy could be improved walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke, these might be also really effect in SCI patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 13, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedJuly 17, 2012
July 1, 2012
3.9 years
September 10, 2011
July 15, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Wernig scale
Walking ability classification in spinal cord injury patients.
4 weeks.
Barthel index
Measure activity of daily living
4 weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Repas
4 weeks.
Manual muscle testing
4 weeks
10 meter walking test
4 weeks.
6 minute walking test
4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
robotic gait training
EXPERIMENTALconventional physical therapy plus robot gait training program for SCI patients.
control
NO INTERVENTIONConventional physical therapy program for 60 minute per day for 5 working day per week.
Interventions
Robotic gait training for 20 minute include preparing and rest time for 10 minute plus conventional physical therapy program for 30 minute, totally 60 minute per day for 5 working day per week.
Conventional physical therapy program for 60 minute per day for 5 working day per week.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subacute spinal cord injury ( C5-T12 level) patients.
- ASIA classification C and D.
- No previous joint contracture.
- No severely active medical condition.
- Can easily communicate with no obvious cognitive impairment.
- Given signed inform consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous injury or other neurological condition that related to neurodeficit in key muscles.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Prasat Neurological Institutelead
- Mahidol Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ratanapat Chanubol
Bangkok, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
Related Publications (4)
Schwartz I, Sajina A, Neeb M, Fisher I, Katz-Luerer M, Meiner Z. Locomotor training using a robotic device in patients with subacute spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2011 Oct;49(10):1062-7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.59. Epub 2011 May 31.
PMID: 21625239BACKGROUNDPohl M, Werner C, Holzgraefe M, Kroczek G, Mehrholz J, Wingendorf I, Hoolig G, Koch R, Hesse S. Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS). Clin Rehabil. 2007 Jan;21(1):17-27. doi: 10.1177/0269215506071281.
PMID: 17213237RESULTTefertiller C, Pharo B, Evans N, Winchester P. Efficacy of rehabilitation robotics for walking training in neurological disorders: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):387-416. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.04.0055.
PMID: 21674390RESULTTaylor-Schroeder S, LaBarbera J, McDowell S, Zanca JM, Natale A, Mumma S, Gassaway J, Backus D. The SCIRehab project: treatment time spent in SCI rehabilitation. Physical therapy treatment time during inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(2):149-61. doi: 10.1179/107902611X12971826988057.
PMID: 21675354RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ratanapat Chanubol, MD.
PM&R department, Prasat Neurological Institute, Bangkok, Thailand. 10400
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2011
First Posted
September 13, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
July 17, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-07