Comparing Intravenous Hydromorphone to Usual Care
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Intravenous Hydromorphone to Usual Care
1 other identifier
interventional
350
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this randomized controlled trial, 2 mg intravenous (IV) hydromorphone will be more efficacious than usual care (usual care is analgesic management according to the judgment of the attending physician caring for that patient) in emergency department (ED) patients aged 21-64 years. The primary efficacy outcomes are the proportion of patients in each arm who choose to forgo additional pain medication in 30 minutes of entry into the study and the change in numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores from baseline to 30 minutes post baseline.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 pain
Started Mar 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 20, 2018
CompletedMay 18, 2018
April 1, 2018
8 months
September 2, 2011
February 9, 2018
April 20, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants Who Declined Additional Medication at 30 Minutes
Amount of patients who choose to forgo additional pain medication at 30 minutes post-baseline when asked the question, "Do you want more pain medication?"
30 minutes
Mean Change in Pain Intensity Score From Baseline to 30 Minutes
Pain intensity is measured on the numerical rating scale (NRS) with scores ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst pain imaginable"). The change in NRS score is calculated by subtracting the score at 30 minutes post treatment from the score at baseline, before treatment. The average of these values was calculated.
30 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Hydromorphone
EXPERIMENTAL2 mg of IV dilaudid will be administered over 2-3 minutes as initial dose.
Usual care
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe attending physician administers whatever IV opioid he/she deems appropriate in whatever dose he/she chooses for initial dosing
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age greater than 21 years and less than 65 years: This is a study of non-elderly adult patients.
- Pain with onset within 7 days: Pain within seven days is the definition of acute pain that has been used in ED literature.
- ED attending physician's judgment that patient's pain warrants IV opioids: The factors that influence the decision to use parenteral opioids are complex. An approach that is commonly taken to address the issue of patient selection in drug trials is to use a specific condition (e.g., renal colic) that would generally be thought to be appropriately treated with an opioid analgesic, thereby eliminating individual judgment about eligibility for the study. However in order to maximize the external validity of the role of opioids in the ED setting, the investigators decided to enroll patients with a variety of diagnoses, all with a complaint of acute pain. Opioids are not an appropriate treatment for all patients who present with a complaint of pain (e.g., gastroenteritis, migraine). Therefore, unless there is a restriction to patients with a specific diagnosis, either an extensive list of diagnoses and situations in which opioids are indicated must be specified, or clinical judgment needs to be used. The investigators have opted for the latter, since it most closely approximates the circumstances of clinical practice.
You may not qualify if:
- Use of other opioids or tramadol within past 24 hours: to avoid introducing assembly bias related to recent opioid use, since this may affect baseline levels of pain and need for analgesics.
- Prior adverse reaction to opioids.
- Chronic pain syndrome: frequently recurrent or daily pain for at least 3 months results in modulation of pain perception which is thought to be due to down-regulation of pain receptors. Examples of chronic pain syndromes include sickle cell anemia, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, and peripheral neuropathies.
- Alcohol intoxication: the presence of alcohol intoxication as judged by the treating physician may alter pain perception.
- Systolic Blood Pressure \<90 mm Hg: Opioids can produce peripheral vasodilation that may result in orthostatic hypotension.
- Oxygen saturation \< 95% on room air: For this study, oxygen saturation must be 95% or above on room air in order to be enrolled.
- Use of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors in past 30 days: MAO inhibitors have been reported to intensify the effects of at least one opioid drug causing anxiety, confusion and significant respiratory depression or coma.
- C02 measurement greater than 46: In accordance with standard protocol, three subsets of patients will have their CO2 measured using a handheld capnometer prior to enrollment in the study. If the CO2 measurement is greater than 46 then the patient will be excluded from the study. The 3 subsets are as follows:
- All patients who have a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
- All patients who report a history of asthma together with greater than a 20 pack-year smoking history
- All patients reporting less than a 20 pack-year smoking history who are having an asthma exacerbation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Montefiore Emergency Department
The Bronx, New York, 10467, United States
Related Publications (1)
Chang AK, Bijur PE, Lupow JB, John Gallagher E. Randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety of a single 2-mg intravenous dose of hydromorphone versus usual care in the management of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;20(2):185-92. doi: 10.1111/acem.12071.
PMID: 23406078DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Andrew Chang, MD, MS
- Organization
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2011
First Posted
September 7, 2011
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
November 1, 2010
Study Completion
November 1, 2010
Last Updated
May 18, 2018
Results First Posted
April 20, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04