NCT01429298

Brief Summary

In this randomized controlled trial, 2 mg intravenous (IV) hydromorphone will be more efficacious than usual care (usual care is analgesic management according to the judgment of the attending physician caring for that patient) in emergency department (ED) patients aged 21-64 years. The primary efficacy outcomes are the proportion of patients in each arm who choose to forgo additional pain medication in 30 minutes of entry into the study and the change in numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores from baseline to 30 minutes post baseline.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
350

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4 pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2010

Shorter than P25 for phase_4 pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2010

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2010

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 2, 2011

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 7, 2011

Completed
6.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 20, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

May 18, 2018

Status Verified

April 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

September 2, 2011

Results QC Date

February 9, 2018

Last Update Submit

April 20, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

AcutePainEmergency DepartmentHydromorphoneProtocol

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Participants Who Declined Additional Medication at 30 Minutes

    Amount of patients who choose to forgo additional pain medication at 30 minutes post-baseline when asked the question, "Do you want more pain medication?"

    30 minutes

  • Mean Change in Pain Intensity Score From Baseline to 30 Minutes

    Pain intensity is measured on the numerical rating scale (NRS) with scores ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst pain imaginable"). The change in NRS score is calculated by subtracting the score at 30 minutes post treatment from the score at baseline, before treatment. The average of these values was calculated.

    30 minutes

Study Arms (2)

Hydromorphone

EXPERIMENTAL

2 mg of IV dilaudid will be administered over 2-3 minutes as initial dose.

Drug: Hydromorphone

Usual care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The attending physician administers whatever IV opioid he/she deems appropriate in whatever dose he/she chooses for initial dosing

Drug: Usual care

Interventions

2 mg IV hydromorphone over to 2-3 minutes

Also known as: Dilaudid
Hydromorphone

Attending administers IV opioid of his choosing

Also known as: Opioids
Usual care

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age greater than 21 years and less than 65 years: This is a study of non-elderly adult patients.
  • Pain with onset within 7 days: Pain within seven days is the definition of acute pain that has been used in ED literature.
  • ED attending physician's judgment that patient's pain warrants IV opioids: The factors that influence the decision to use parenteral opioids are complex. An approach that is commonly taken to address the issue of patient selection in drug trials is to use a specific condition (e.g., renal colic) that would generally be thought to be appropriately treated with an opioid analgesic, thereby eliminating individual judgment about eligibility for the study. However in order to maximize the external validity of the role of opioids in the ED setting, the investigators decided to enroll patients with a variety of diagnoses, all with a complaint of acute pain. Opioids are not an appropriate treatment for all patients who present with a complaint of pain (e.g., gastroenteritis, migraine). Therefore, unless there is a restriction to patients with a specific diagnosis, either an extensive list of diagnoses and situations in which opioids are indicated must be specified, or clinical judgment needs to be used. The investigators have opted for the latter, since it most closely approximates the circumstances of clinical practice.

You may not qualify if:

  • Use of other opioids or tramadol within past 24 hours: to avoid introducing assembly bias related to recent opioid use, since this may affect baseline levels of pain and need for analgesics.
  • Prior adverse reaction to opioids.
  • Chronic pain syndrome: frequently recurrent or daily pain for at least 3 months results in modulation of pain perception which is thought to be due to down-regulation of pain receptors. Examples of chronic pain syndromes include sickle cell anemia, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, and peripheral neuropathies.
  • Alcohol intoxication: the presence of alcohol intoxication as judged by the treating physician may alter pain perception.
  • Systolic Blood Pressure \<90 mm Hg: Opioids can produce peripheral vasodilation that may result in orthostatic hypotension.
  • Oxygen saturation \< 95% on room air: For this study, oxygen saturation must be 95% or above on room air in order to be enrolled.
  • Use of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors in past 30 days: MAO inhibitors have been reported to intensify the effects of at least one opioid drug causing anxiety, confusion and significant respiratory depression or coma.
  • C02 measurement greater than 46: In accordance with standard protocol, three subsets of patients will have their CO2 measured using a handheld capnometer prior to enrollment in the study. If the CO2 measurement is greater than 46 then the patient will be excluded from the study. The 3 subsets are as follows:
  • All patients who have a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • All patients who report a history of asthma together with greater than a 20 pack-year smoking history
  • All patients reporting less than a 20 pack-year smoking history who are having an asthma exacerbation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Montefiore Emergency Department

The Bronx, New York, 10467, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Chang AK, Bijur PE, Lupow JB, John Gallagher E. Randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety of a single 2-mg intravenous dose of hydromorphone versus usual care in the management of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;20(2):185-92. doi: 10.1111/acem.12071.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainEmergencies

Interventions

HydromorphoneAnalgesics, Opioid

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsDisease AttributesPathologic Processes

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Morphine DerivativesMorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic CompoundsNarcoticsCentral Nervous System DepressantsPhysiological Effects of DrugsPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesAnalgesicsSensory System AgentsPeripheral Nervous System AgentsCentral Nervous System AgentsTherapeutic Uses

Results Point of Contact

Title
Andrew Chang, MD, MS
Organization
Department of Emergency Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2011

First Posted

September 7, 2011

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion

November 1, 2010

Study Completion

November 1, 2010

Last Updated

May 18, 2018

Results First Posted

April 20, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-04

Locations