A Double Blind Crossover Study on the Effect of MPH on Decision-making Ability of Adults With BPD Compared to Adults With ADHD and Healthy Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study assesses the effect of Ritalin on working memory,attention,and decision-making measures in adults with BPD and compares it to its effect on healthy adults and adults with BPD (using data form study SHA 01-10), in a double-blind crossover design. The investigators hypothesize that Ritalin will result in better performance in all measures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 28, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedAugust 23, 2012
August 1, 2012
1 year
August 28, 2011
August 22, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) score
This test, devised by Greenberg and Kindschi (1996), is one of many continuous performance tests (CPTs), rapid reaction-time tasks in which participants have to discriminate predetermined target stimuli from distracting non-targets. CPTs, and TOVA among them, are widely used both by practitioners and investigators as an objective tool for assessing ADHD and determining beneficial medical effects (Llorente et al. 2001). The TOVA used here is a standardized, fixed-interval (21.6 ± 1.1 min), visual CPT.
20 minutes
Iowa gambling task (IGT) score
a computerized version of the Iowa Gambling Task (Bechara et al. 1994), which assesses reward learning. In this task the participant is presented with four decks of cards on the computer screen. Each card yields a reward, but might also cast a loss. In each trial, the participant selects a card out of one of the four decks by clicking on it. Consequently, the card is exposed, displaying the gain and the loss for that trial. The accumulated total amount is presented at the bottom of the screen all along, and is updated after every trial. Through contingent feedback, participants are expected to learn that decks A and B yield constant large gains but also larger losses, so that their net loss across trials is 2,500 tokens, whereas decks C and D yield smaller gains but also smaller losses, leading to a net gain across trials of 2,500 tokens
30 minutes
Foregone Payoff Gambling Task (FPGT) score
gambling task is a version of the IGT developed for the purpose of the current study. Two differences distinguish it from the original version - a different payoff distribution as detailed in Table 3, and a feedback method called foregone payoffs: following each choice made by the participants, they get to see not only the card chosen but also the other three cards from the three decks not chosen. This provides more information, but can also cause temptation, and may distract participants from the advantageous decks (see e.g., Yechiam et al. 2005; Yechiam and Busemeyer 2006).
30 minutes
Spatial Working Memory (SWM) score
CANTAB task for assessing Spatial Working Memory
10 minutes
digit span score
Forward and Backward digit-span task (Wechsler 1981)
20 minutes
Study Arms (1)
BPD adults
EXPERIMENTALadults with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)
Interventions
a capsule containing 20 mg
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults in the age of 21-50 with diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)
You may not qualify if:
- People diagnosed with a clinical disorder other than BPD or ADD/ADHD that may impair their performance in the tasks used in the study.
- People for whom there is a contra-indication for consuming Ritalin.
- Pregnant women and nursing women; Women participants will be required to report whether they are pregnant, and in case they are, they will not participate.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shalvata Mental Health center
Hod HaSharon, Israel
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hilik Levkovitz, Prof.
Shalvata MHC
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2011
First Posted
September 1, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
August 23, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-08