Effect of Saline Irrigation to DEcrease Rate Of Residual Common Bile Duct Stones
SIDEROD
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In recent years, endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction are standard procedures for the removal of bile duct stones. After procedures, there are some complications such as stone recurrence, papillary stenosis, cholangitis and liver abscess. These recurrent symptomatic bile duct stones, despite increasing experience and success with the procedure, occur in 4% to 24% of patients. Gallbladder stone, pneumobilia and many other various factors are known to be associated with CBD stone recurrence. Lithotripsy was also related to the development of recurrent stones. It is natural that small stone fragments left after lithotripsy may act as nidi for stone recurrence. Small remaining stone could not be completely detected only using ERCP stone removal and remaining stone removal can reduce residual and recurrent stones. Saline irrigation was effective immediately after ERCP stone removal to remove remaining small stones. Saline irrigation has many advantages such as easy to treatment during ERCP stone removal, almost no additional cost and rare side effect. This study The authors expect this study is a remarkable role of ERCP stone removal procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Aug 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedAugust 29, 2011
August 1, 2011
1.3 years
August 26, 2011
August 26, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Retained CBD stones
* CT or USG * Symptomatic choledocholithiasis
From 3 to 6 months after procedure
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Recurrent CBD Stones
Over 6months after procedure
Cholangitis
Over 6months after procedure
Study Arms (1)
Normal saline irrigation
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
After removing CBD stones with the ERCP, 200ml of the normal saline solution was irrigated into the common bile duct.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patients were treated with CBD stone removal during therapeutic ERCP after finding CBD stones with CT, ultrasound or MRCP.
- The patients were treated with CBD stone removal during diagnostic ERCP because of cholangitis or cholecystitis.
You may not qualify if:
- Hemodynamic instability
- Younger than 18
- Mental illness
- Received previous CBD stone removal
- Hemolytic anemia, IHD stone, parasites in hepatobiliary system
- Genetic, autoimmune, congenital biliary disorder
- Liver or biliary surgery except cholecystectomy
- Pancreatic cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, ampulla of vater cancer
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seoungnam, Gyeonggi-do, 463-707, South Korea
Related Publications (17)
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, Banerjee S, Cash BD, Fisher L, Harrison ME, Fanelli RD, Fukami N, Ikenberry SO, Jain R, Khan K, Krinsky ML, Strohmeyer L, Dominitz JA. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jan;71(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.041. No abstract available.
PMID: 20105473BACKGROUNDEinstein DM, Lapin SA, Ralls PW, Halls JM. The insensitivity of sonography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Apr;142(4):725-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.142.4.725.
PMID: 6608231BACKGROUNDMiller FH, Hwang CM, Gabriel H, Goodhartz LA, Omar AJ, Parsons WG 3rd. Contrast-enhanced helical CT of choledocholithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Jul;181(1):125-30. doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.1.1810125. No abstract available.
PMID: 12818842BACKGROUNDSoto JA, Alvarez O, Munera F, Velez SM, Valencia J, Ramirez N. Diagnosing bile duct stones: comparison of unenhanced helical CT, oral contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography, and MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Oct;175(4):1127-34. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.4.1751127.
PMID: 11000177BACKGROUNDBoraschi P, Neri E, Braccini G, Gigoni R, Caramella D, Perri G, Bartolozzi C. Choledocolithiasis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Three-year experience. Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Nov;17(9):1245-53. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(99)00075-2.
PMID: 10576709BACKGROUNDTse F, Liu L, Barkun AN, Armstrong D, Moayyedi P. EUS: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Feb;67(2):235-44. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.09.047.
PMID: 18226685BACKGROUNDDas A, Isenberg G, Wong RC, Sivak MV Jr, Chak A. Wire-guided intraductal US: an adjunct to ERCP in the management of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Jul;54(1):31-6. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.115006.
PMID: 11427838BACKGROUNDTseng LJ, Jao YT, Mo LR, Lin RC. Over-the-wire US catheter probe as an adjunct to ERCP in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Dec;54(6):720-3. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.119255.
PMID: 11726847BACKGROUNDCotton PB, Geenen JE, Sherman S, Cunningham JT, Howell DA, Carr-Locke DL, Nickl NJ, Hawes RH, Lehman GA, Ferrari A, Slivka A, Lichtenstein DR, Baillie J, Jowell PS, Lail LM, Evangelou H, Bosco JJ, Hanson BL, Hoffman BJ, Rahaman SM, Male R. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for stones by experts is safe, even in younger patients with normal ducts. Ann Surg. 1998 Feb;227(2):201-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199802000-00008.
PMID: 9488517BACKGROUNDDuensing RA, Williams RA, Collins JC, Wilson SE. Managing choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg. 1995 Dec;170(6):619-23. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80028-2.
PMID: 7492013BACKGROUNDKeizman D, Shalom MI, Konikoff FM. An angulated common bile duct predisposes to recurrent symptomatic bile duct stones after endoscopic stone extraction. Surg Endosc. 2006 Oct;20(10):1594-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0656-x. Epub 2006 Jul 20.
PMID: 16858527BACKGROUNDCheon YK, Lehman GA. Identification of risk factors for stone recurrence after endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 May;18(5):461-4. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200605000-00001.
PMID: 16607138BACKGROUNDAndo T, Tsuyuguchi T, Okugawa T, Saito M, Ishihara T, Yamaguchi T, Saisho H. Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy. Gut. 2003 Jan;52(1):116-21. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.1.116.
PMID: 12477771BACKGROUNDTsuchiya S, Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Y, Sugiyama H, Miyagawa K, Fukuda Y, Ando T, Saisho H, Yokosuka O. Clinical utility of intraductal US to decrease early recurrence rate of common bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Oct;23(10):1590-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05458.x. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
PMID: 18554235BACKGROUNDAng TL, Teo EK, Fock KM, Lyn Tan JY. Are there roles for intraductal US and saline solution irrigation in ensuring complete clearance of common bile duct stones? Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jun;69(7):1276-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.10.018. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
PMID: 19249039BACKGROUNDBoix J, Lorenzo-Zuniga V, Ananos F, Domenech E, Morillas RM, Gassull MA. Impact of periampullary duodenal diverticula at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a proposed classification of periampullary duodenal diverticula. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006 Aug;16(4):208-11. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200608000-00002.
PMID: 16921297BACKGROUNDAhn DW, Lee SH, Paik WH, Song BJ, Park JM, Kim J, Jeong JB, Hwang JH, Ryu JK, Kim YT. Effects of Saline Irrigation of the Bile Duct to Reduce the Rate of Residual Common Bile Duct Stones: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr;113(4):548-555. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2018.21. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
PMID: 29610513DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sang Hyub Lee, M.D. Ph.D
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sang Eon Jang, M.D.
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2011
First Posted
August 29, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
August 29, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-08