Conventional Versus Rendezvous Technique of Intraoperative Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
1 other identifier
interventional
98
1 country
1
Brief Summary
One of the new methods for management of common bile duct stones is intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy. It can be performed by many techniques. In the study the investigators compare two methods to find out the best technique for intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2007
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 6, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 27, 2010
CompletedAugust 27, 2010
February 1, 2010
2.3 years
July 6, 2010
August 26, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
success/failure rate of common bile duct stones removal
Secondary Outcomes (1)
complication rate
Study Arms (2)
conventional technique of ERCP
PLACEBO COMPARATORRendezvous technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with MRCP evidence of common bile duct stones
You may not qualify if:
- cholangitis pancreatitis ASA GRADE III, IV Unfit for laparoscopy unfit for ERCP
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gastroenterology Surgical Center
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 35516, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 6, 2010
First Posted
August 27, 2010
Study Start
October 1, 2007
Primary Completion
February 1, 2010
Study Completion
March 1, 2010
Last Updated
August 27, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-02