NCT01424566

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of nabiximols (Sativex®), compared with placebo, when used as an adjunctive measure in relieving uncontrolled persistent chronic pain (not breakthrough pain) in participants with advanced cancer, who had inadequate analgesia even with optimized chronic opioid therapy. This multi-center study was conducted in two parts. All participants enrolled into the trial received nabiximols during one of two parts of the study, but they did not know which part. Eligible participants were not required to stop any of their current treatments or medications.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
406

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2012

Longer than P75 for phase_3 pain

Geographic Reach
13 countries

65 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 25, 2011

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 29, 2011

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 29, 2012

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 10, 2015

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 28, 2015

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 23, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

April 12, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

August 25, 2011

Results QC Date

March 23, 2018

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Cancer painOpioid therapyInadequate analgesiaOptimized chronic opioid therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Randomization Baseline In Mean NRS Average Pain At End Of Treatment

    Participants indicated the level of pain experienced in the last 24 hours on an 11-point NRS, where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine." Change in mean NRS average pain was calculated as: End of Treatment NRS average pain score - Randomization (Part B) Baseline NRS average pain score. The participant's Randomization (Part B) baseline pain 0-10 NRS value was the mean over the last 4 consecutive days of the single-blind treatment period (Part A; pre-randomization). A negative value indicates an improvement in average pain score from Randomization (Part B) Baseline.

    Randomization Baseline, End of Treatment (Day 36 of the double-blind period)

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Percent Improvement From Eligibility Baseline In Mean NRS Average Pain Score At End Of Treatment

    Eligibility Baseline, End of Treatment (Day 36 of the double-blind period)

  • Change From Randomization Baseline In Mean NRS Worst Pain At End Of Treatment

    Randomization Baseline, End of Treatment (Day 36 of the double-blind period)

  • Change From Randomization Baseline In Mean Sleep Disruption NRS At End Of Treatment

    Randomization Baseline, End of Treatment (Day 36 of the double-blind period)

  • Subject Global Impression Of Change At Last Visit (Up To Day 36 Of The Double-blind Period)

    Last Visit (up to Day 36 of the double-blind period)

  • Physician Global Impression Of Change At Last Visit (Up To Day 36 Of The Double-blind Period)

    Last Visit (up to Day 36 of the double-blind period)

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Nabiximols

EXPERIMENTAL

Nabiximols was self-administered by participants as a 100 microliter (μL) oromucosal spray in the morning and evening, up to a maximum of 10 sprays per day for 2 or 7 weeks. Nabiximols oromucosal spray contained delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (27 milligrams \[mg\]/milliliter \[mL\]):cannabidiol (CBD) (25 mg/mL), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%)flavoring. Each 100 μL actuation delivered 2.7 mg THC and 2.5 mg CBD.

Drug: Nabiximols

Placebo (GA-0034)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo was self-administered by participants as a 100 μL oromucosal spray in the morning and evening, up to a maximum of 10 sprays per day for 5 weeks. Placebo oromucosal spray contained ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavoring and colorings.

Drug: Placebo (GA-0034)

Interventions

Also known as: Sativex®
Nabiximols
Placebo (GA-0034)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The participant had advanced cancer for which there is no known curative therapy
  • The participant had a clinical diagnosis of cancer related pain, which was not alleviated with their current optimized opioid treatment
  • The participant received an optimized maintenance dose of Step 3 opioid therapy, preferably with a sustained release preparation, but also allowing a regular maintenance dose of around the clock use of immediate release preparations
  • The participant received a daily maintenance dose Step 3 opioid therapy of less than or equal to a total daily opioid dose of 500 mg/day of morphine equivalence (including maintenance and break-through opioids)
  • The participant was using no more than one type of break-through opioid analgesia

You may not qualify if:

  • Had any planned clinical interventions that would have affected their pain (for example, chemotherapy or radiation therapy where, in the clinical judgment of the investigator, these would be expected to affect pain)
  • The participant was currently using or had used cannabis or cannabinoid-based medications within 30 days of study entry and was unwilling to abstain for the duration of the study
  • Had experienced myocardial infarction or clinically significant cardiac dysfunction within the last 12 months or had a cardiac disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator would have put the participant at risk of a clinically significant arrhythmia or myocardial infarction
  • Had significantly impaired renal function
  • Had significantly impaired hepatic function
  • Female participants of child-bearing potential and male participants whose partner was of child-bearing potential, unless willing to ensure that they or their partner used effective contraception, for example, oral contraception, double barrier, intra-uterine device, during the study and for three months thereafter (however, a male condom was not to be used in conjunction with a female condom as this may not have proven effective)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (65)

Unknown Facility

East Melbourne, 3002, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Parkville, 3050, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Shumen, 9700, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Varna, 9010, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Vratsa, 3000, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Lünen, 44534, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Stadtroda, 07646, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Wetzlar, 35578, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Budapest, 1135, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Deszk, 6772, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Komárom, 2900, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Nyíregyháza, 4412, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Szikszó, 3800, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Bangalore, 560034, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Jaipur, 302017, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Pune, 411004, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Ashkelon, 78306, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Beersheba, 84101, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Haifa, 31096, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Jerusalem, 91120, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Ramat Gan, 52621, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Ẕerifin, 60930, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Garbagnate Milanese, 20024, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Piacenza, 29100, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Torino, 10126, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Klaipėda, 92288, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Šiauliai, 76307, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Vilnius, 08660, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Bydgoszcz, 85-796, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Czeladź, 41-250, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Gdansk, 80-208, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Gliwice, 44-101, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Kłodzko, 57-300, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Opole, 45-272, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, 27-400, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Poznan, 61-245, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Warsaw, 02-781, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Warsaw, 02-793, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Włocławek, 87-800, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Alba Iulia, 510077, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Baia Mare, 430241, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Brăila, 810325, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Bucharest, 010976, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Focşani, 620165, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Oradea, 410469, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Satu Mare, 440055, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Sibiu, 550245, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Suceava, 720237, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Cadiz, 11009, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Granada, 18014, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Madrid, 28050, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Salamanca, 37129, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Seville, 41013, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Changhua, 500, Taiwan

Location

Unknown Facility

Taichung, 404, Taiwan

Location

Unknown Facility

Tainan, 73657, Taiwan

Location

Unknown Facility

Taipei, 10002, Taiwan

Location

Unknown Facility

Taipei, 10099, Taiwan

Location

Unknown Facility

Taipei, 11213, Taiwan

Location

Unknown Facility

Taipei, 11490, Taiwan

Location

Unknown Facility

Bury St Edmunds, IP33 2QZ, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Glasgow, G12 0YN, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Norwich, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Fallon MT, Albert Lux E, McQuade R, Rossetti S, Sanchez R, Sun W, Wright S, Lichtman AH, Kornyeyeva E. Sativex oromucosal spray as adjunctive therapy in advanced cancer patients with chronic pain unalleviated by optimized opioid therapy: two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies. Br J Pain. 2017 Aug;11(3):119-133. doi: 10.1177/2049463717710042. Epub 2017 May 17.

    PMID: 28785408BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainCancer Pain

Interventions

nabiximols

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Medical Enquiries
Organization
GW Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2011

First Posted

August 29, 2011

Study Start

June 29, 2012

Primary Completion

July 10, 2015

Study Completion

December 28, 2015

Last Updated

April 12, 2023

Results First Posted

April 23, 2018

Record last verified: 2023-04

Locations