A Two-Part Study of Sativex® Oromucosal Spray for Relieving Uncontrolled Persistent Pain in Patients With Advanced Cancer
A Two-part, Placebo-controlled, Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Sativex® Oromucosal Spray (Sativex®; Nabiximols) as Adjunctive Therapy in Relieving Uncontrolled Persistent Chronic Pain in Patients With Advanced Cancer, Who Have Inadequate Analgesia Even With Optimized Chronic Opioid Therapy.
2 other identifiers
interventional
406
13 countries
65
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of nabiximols (Sativex®), compared with placebo, when used as an adjunctive measure in relieving uncontrolled persistent chronic pain (not breakthrough pain) in participants with advanced cancer, who had inadequate analgesia even with optimized chronic opioid therapy. This multi-center study was conducted in two parts. All participants enrolled into the trial received nabiximols during one of two parts of the study, but they did not know which part. Eligible participants were not required to stop any of their current treatments or medications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 pain
Started Jun 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_3 pain
65 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 25, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 29, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 10, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 28, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 23, 2018
CompletedApril 12, 2023
April 1, 2023
3 years
August 25, 2011
March 23, 2018
April 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Randomization Baseline In Mean NRS Average Pain At End Of Treatment
Participants indicated the level of pain experienced in the last 24 hours on an 11-point NRS, where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine." Change in mean NRS average pain was calculated as: End of Treatment NRS average pain score - Randomization (Part B) Baseline NRS average pain score. The participant's Randomization (Part B) baseline pain 0-10 NRS value was the mean over the last 4 consecutive days of the single-blind treatment period (Part A; pre-randomization). A negative value indicates an improvement in average pain score from Randomization (Part B) Baseline.
Randomization Baseline, End of Treatment (Day 36 of the double-blind period)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Percent Improvement From Eligibility Baseline In Mean NRS Average Pain Score At End Of Treatment
Eligibility Baseline, End of Treatment (Day 36 of the double-blind period)
Change From Randomization Baseline In Mean NRS Worst Pain At End Of Treatment
Randomization Baseline, End of Treatment (Day 36 of the double-blind period)
Change From Randomization Baseline In Mean Sleep Disruption NRS At End Of Treatment
Randomization Baseline, End of Treatment (Day 36 of the double-blind period)
Subject Global Impression Of Change At Last Visit (Up To Day 36 Of The Double-blind Period)
Last Visit (up to Day 36 of the double-blind period)
Physician Global Impression Of Change At Last Visit (Up To Day 36 Of The Double-blind Period)
Last Visit (up to Day 36 of the double-blind period)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Nabiximols
EXPERIMENTALNabiximols was self-administered by participants as a 100 microliter (μL) oromucosal spray in the morning and evening, up to a maximum of 10 sprays per day for 2 or 7 weeks. Nabiximols oromucosal spray contained delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (27 milligrams \[mg\]/milliliter \[mL\]):cannabidiol (CBD) (25 mg/mL), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%)flavoring. Each 100 μL actuation delivered 2.7 mg THC and 2.5 mg CBD.
Placebo (GA-0034)
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo was self-administered by participants as a 100 μL oromucosal spray in the morning and evening, up to a maximum of 10 sprays per day for 5 weeks. Placebo oromucosal spray contained ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavoring and colorings.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The participant had advanced cancer for which there is no known curative therapy
- The participant had a clinical diagnosis of cancer related pain, which was not alleviated with their current optimized opioid treatment
- The participant received an optimized maintenance dose of Step 3 opioid therapy, preferably with a sustained release preparation, but also allowing a regular maintenance dose of around the clock use of immediate release preparations
- The participant received a daily maintenance dose Step 3 opioid therapy of less than or equal to a total daily opioid dose of 500 mg/day of morphine equivalence (including maintenance and break-through opioids)
- The participant was using no more than one type of break-through opioid analgesia
You may not qualify if:
- Had any planned clinical interventions that would have affected their pain (for example, chemotherapy or radiation therapy where, in the clinical judgment of the investigator, these would be expected to affect pain)
- The participant was currently using or had used cannabis or cannabinoid-based medications within 30 days of study entry and was unwilling to abstain for the duration of the study
- Had experienced myocardial infarction or clinically significant cardiac dysfunction within the last 12 months or had a cardiac disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator would have put the participant at risk of a clinically significant arrhythmia or myocardial infarction
- Had significantly impaired renal function
- Had significantly impaired hepatic function
- Female participants of child-bearing potential and male participants whose partner was of child-bearing potential, unless willing to ensure that they or their partner used effective contraception, for example, oral contraception, double barrier, intra-uterine device, during the study and for three months thereafter (however, a male condom was not to be used in conjunction with a female condom as this may not have proven effective)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (65)
Unknown Facility
East Melbourne, 3002, Australia
Unknown Facility
Parkville, 3050, Australia
Unknown Facility
Shumen, 9700, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Varna, 9010, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Vratsa, 3000, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Lünen, 44534, Germany
Unknown Facility
Stadtroda, 07646, Germany
Unknown Facility
Wetzlar, 35578, Germany
Unknown Facility
Budapest, 1135, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Deszk, 6772, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Komárom, 2900, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Nyíregyháza, 4412, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Szikszó, 3800, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Bangalore, 560034, India
Unknown Facility
Jaipur, 302017, India
Unknown Facility
Pune, 411004, India
Unknown Facility
Ashkelon, 78306, Israel
Unknown Facility
Beersheba, 84101, Israel
Unknown Facility
Haifa, 31096, Israel
Unknown Facility
Jerusalem, 91120, Israel
Unknown Facility
Ramat Gan, 52621, Israel
Unknown Facility
Ẕerifin, 60930, Israel
Unknown Facility
Garbagnate Milanese, 20024, Italy
Unknown Facility
Piacenza, 29100, Italy
Unknown Facility
Torino, 10126, Italy
Unknown Facility
Klaipėda, 92288, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Šiauliai, 76307, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Vilnius, 08660, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Bydgoszcz, 85-796, Poland
Unknown Facility
Czeladź, 41-250, Poland
Unknown Facility
Gdansk, 80-208, Poland
Unknown Facility
Gliwice, 44-101, Poland
Unknown Facility
Kłodzko, 57-300, Poland
Unknown Facility
Opole, 45-272, Poland
Unknown Facility
Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, 27-400, Poland
Unknown Facility
Poznan, 61-245, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, 02-781, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, 02-793, Poland
Unknown Facility
Włocławek, 87-800, Poland
Unknown Facility
Alba Iulia, 510077, Romania
Unknown Facility
Baia Mare, 430241, Romania
Unknown Facility
Brăila, 810325, Romania
Unknown Facility
Bucharest, 010976, Romania
Unknown Facility
Focşani, 620165, Romania
Unknown Facility
Oradea, 410469, Romania
Unknown Facility
Satu Mare, 440055, Romania
Unknown Facility
Sibiu, 550245, Romania
Unknown Facility
Suceava, 720237, Romania
Unknown Facility
Cadiz, 11009, Spain
Unknown Facility
Granada, 18014, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, 28050, Spain
Unknown Facility
Salamanca, 37129, Spain
Unknown Facility
Seville, 41013, Spain
Unknown Facility
Changhua, 500, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taichung, 404, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Tainan, 73657, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taipei, 10099, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taipei, 11213, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taipei, 11490, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Bury St Edmunds, IP33 2QZ, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Glasgow, G12 0YN, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Norwich, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Fallon MT, Albert Lux E, McQuade R, Rossetti S, Sanchez R, Sun W, Wright S, Lichtman AH, Kornyeyeva E. Sativex oromucosal spray as adjunctive therapy in advanced cancer patients with chronic pain unalleviated by optimized opioid therapy: two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies. Br J Pain. 2017 Aug;11(3):119-133. doi: 10.1177/2049463717710042. Epub 2017 May 17.
PMID: 28785408BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Enquiries
- Organization
- GW Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 25, 2011
First Posted
August 29, 2011
Study Start
June 29, 2012
Primary Completion
July 10, 2015
Study Completion
December 28, 2015
Last Updated
April 12, 2023
Results First Posted
April 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2023-04