Sativex® for Relieving Persistent Pain in Participants With Advanced Cancer
A Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study of Sativex Oromucosal Spray (Sativex®; Nabiximols) as Adjunctive Therapy in Relieving Uncontrolled Persistent Chronic Pain in Patients With Advanced Cancer, Who Experience Inadequate Analgesia During Optimized Chronic Opioid Therapy
2 other identifiers
interventional
397
12 countries
72
Brief Summary
This 9-week study aimed to determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of nabiximols (Sativex®) as an adjunctive treatment, compared with placebo in relieving uncontrolled persistent chronic pain in participants with advanced cancer. Eligible participants were not required to stop any of their current treatments or medications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 pain
Started Nov 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_3 pain
72 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 25, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 2, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 2, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 23, 2018
CompletedApril 23, 2018
March 1, 2018
4.6 years
December 16, 2010
March 23, 2018
March 23, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent Improvement From Baseline In Mean NRS Average Pain At End Of Treatment
Participants indicated level of pain in the last 24 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where a score of 0 was "no pain" and 10 was "pain as bad as you can imagine". Baseline = mean score from first day of 3-day eligibility period through to the day before first dose of study drug. End of Treatment = mean score over last (up to) 7 days to the final pain score at End of Treatment or up until Day 35, whichever is earlier, or final score available (prematurely terminated). Percentage improvement from baseline (Imp%) was calculated as: Imp% = (Baseline pain NRS mean - End of Treatment pain NRS mean)/Baseline pain NRS mean \* 100. For participants who died or withdrew due to disease progression, Imp% values were used. For participants who died or withdrew unrelated to disease progression before end of Week 5 (no diary data from Day 33 onwards), Imp% was zero for participants whose Imp% value was positive and it was Imp% for participants whose Imp% value was not positive.
Baseline, End of Treatment (Day 36)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Change From Baseline In Mean NRS Average Pain At End Of Treatment
Baseline, End Of Treatment (Day 36)
Change From Baseline In Mean NRS Worst Pain At End Of Treatment
Baseline, End of Treatment (Day 36)
Change From Baseline In Mean Sleep Disruption NRS At End Of Treatment
Baseline, End of Treatment (Day 36)
Subject Global Impression Of Change At Last Visit (Up To Day 36)
Last Visit (up to Day 36)
Physician Global Impression Of Change At Last Visit (Up To Day 36)
Last Visit (up to Day 36)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Nabiximols
EXPERIMENTALNabiximols was self-administered by participants as a 100 microliter (μL) oromucosal spray in the morning and evening, up to a maximum of 10 sprays per day for 5 weeks. Nabiximols oromucosal spray contained delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (27 milligram \[mg\]/milliliter \[mL\]):cannabidiol (CBD) (25 mg/mL), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavoring. Each 100 μL actuation delivered 2.7 mg THC and 2.5 mg CBD.
Placebo (GA-0034)
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo Comparator: Placebo (GA-0034) Placebo was self-administered by participants as a 100 μL oromucosal spray in the morning and evening, up to a maximum of 10 sprays per day for 5 weeks. Placebo oromucosal spray contained ethanol: propylene glycol (50:50)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The participant had advanced cancer for which there was no known curative therapy
- The participant had a clinical diagnosis of cancer related pain, which was not wholly alleviated with their current optimized opioid treatment
- The participant received an optimized maintenance dose of Step 3 opioid therapy, preferably with a sustained release preparation, but also allowing a regular maintenance dose of around the clock use of immediate release preparations
- The participant received a daily maintenance dose Step 3 opioid therapy of less than or equal to a total daily opioid dose of 500 mg/day of morphine equivalence (including maintenance and break-through opioids)
- The participant was using no more than one type of break-through opioid analgesia
You may not qualify if:
- The participant had any planned clinical interventions that would have affected their pain (for example, chemotherapy or radiation therapy where, in the clinical judgment of the investigator, these would be expected to affect pain)
- The participant was using or had used cannabis or cannabinoid-based medications within 30 days of study entry and is unwilling to abstain for the duration of the study
- The participant had experienced myocardial infarction or clinically significant cardiac dysfunction within the last 12 months or had a cardiac disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, would have put the participant at risk of a clinically significant arrhythmia or myocardial infarction
- The participant had significantly impaired renal function
- The participant had significantly impaired hepatic function
- Female participants of child-bearing potential and male participants whose partner was of child-bearing potential, unless willing to ensure that they or their partner used effective contraception, for example, oral contraception, double barrier, intra-uterine device, during the study and for 3 months thereafter (however, a male condom was not to be used in conjunction with a female condom as this may not have proven effective)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (72)
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, 85027, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, 85028, United States
Unknown Facility
El Cajon, California, 92020, United States
Unknown Facility
Gilroy, California, 95020, United States
Unknown Facility
Brandon, Florida, 33511, United States
Unknown Facility
Daytona Beach, Florida, 32117, United States
Unknown Facility
Holiday, Florida, 34691, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, 32257, United States
Unknown Facility
Lynn Haven, Florida, 32444, United States
Unknown Facility
Stuart, Florida, 34994, United States
Unknown Facility
Winter Park, Florida, 32789, United States
Unknown Facility
Newnan, Georgia, 30265, United States
Unknown Facility
Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281, United States
Unknown Facility
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71105, United States
Unknown Facility
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55426, United States
Unknown Facility
Kansas City, Missouri, 64132, United States
Unknown Facility
Berlin, New Jersey, 08009, United States
Unknown Facility
Hendersonville, North Carolina, 28739, United States
Unknown Facility
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
Unknown Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, 77024, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, 77089, United States
Unknown Facility
Laredo, Texas, 78041, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84124, United States
Unknown Facility
Brussels, 1000, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Gabrovo, 5300, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Shumen, 9700, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Varna, 9010, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
České Budějovice, 370 01, Czechia
Unknown Facility
České Budějovice, 370 87, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Hradec Králové, 500 05, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Most, 434 64, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Nová Ves pod Pleší, 262 04, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Ostrava-Poruba, 708 52, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Pilsen, 304 60, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Lünen, 44534, Germany
Unknown Facility
Stadtroda, 07646, Germany
Unknown Facility
Wetzlar, 35578, Germany
Unknown Facility
Deszk, H-6772, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Kecskemét, H-6000, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Komárom, H-2900, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Miskolc, H-3501, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Nyíregyháza, H-4412, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Szekszárd, H-7100, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Rēzekne, LV-4600, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Riga, LV-1079, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Klaipėda, LT-92288, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Šiauliai, LT-76307, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Vilnius, LT-08660, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Bialystok, 15-250, Poland
Unknown Facility
Bielsko-Biala, 43-300, Poland
Unknown Facility
Gliwice, 44-101, Poland
Unknown Facility
Poznan, 61-245, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, 02-781, Poland
Unknown Facility
Ponce, 00717, Puerto Rico
Unknown Facility
San Juan, 00927, Puerto Rico
Unknown Facility
Baia Mare, 430031, Romania
Unknown Facility
Brăila, 810325, Romania
Unknown Facility
Bucharest, 010976, Romania
Unknown Facility
Craiova, 200385, Romania
Unknown Facility
Oradea, 410469, Romania
Unknown Facility
Satu Mare, 440055, Romania
Unknown Facility
Suceava, 720237, Romania
Unknown Facility
Bury, BL9 7TD, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Bury St Edmunds, IP33 2QZ, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Glasgow, G12 0YN, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Manchester, M8 5RB, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Norwich, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Weston-super-Mare, BS23 4TQ, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Lichtman AH, Lux EA, McQuade R, Rossetti S, Sanchez R, Sun W, Wright S, Kornyeyeva E, Fallon MT. Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Nabiximols Oromucosal Spray as an Adjunctive Therapy in Advanced Cancer Patients with Chronic Uncontrolled Pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2):179-188.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
PMID: 28923526BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Enquiries
- Organization
- GW Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2010
First Posted
December 17, 2010
Study Start
November 25, 2010
Primary Completion
July 2, 2015
Study Completion
July 2, 2015
Last Updated
April 23, 2018
Results First Posted
April 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03