NCT01262651

Brief Summary

This 9-week study aimed to determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of nabiximols (Sativex®) as an adjunctive treatment, compared with placebo in relieving uncontrolled persistent chronic pain in participants with advanced cancer. Eligible participants were not required to stop any of their current treatments or medications.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
397

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2010

Longer than P75 for phase_3 pain

Geographic Reach
12 countries

72 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 25, 2010

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 16, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 17, 2010

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 2, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 2, 2015

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 23, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

April 23, 2018

Status Verified

March 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4.6 years

First QC Date

December 16, 2010

Results QC Date

March 23, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 23, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Cancer painOpioid therapyInadequate analgesiaOptimized chronic opioid therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percent Improvement From Baseline In Mean NRS Average Pain At End Of Treatment

    Participants indicated level of pain in the last 24 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where a score of 0 was "no pain" and 10 was "pain as bad as you can imagine". Baseline = mean score from first day of 3-day eligibility period through to the day before first dose of study drug. End of Treatment = mean score over last (up to) 7 days to the final pain score at End of Treatment or up until Day 35, whichever is earlier, or final score available (prematurely terminated). Percentage improvement from baseline (Imp%) was calculated as: Imp% = (Baseline pain NRS mean - End of Treatment pain NRS mean)/Baseline pain NRS mean \* 100. For participants who died or withdrew due to disease progression, Imp% values were used. For participants who died or withdrew unrelated to disease progression before end of Week 5 (no diary data from Day 33 onwards), Imp% was zero for participants whose Imp% value was positive and it was Imp% for participants whose Imp% value was not positive.

    Baseline, End of Treatment (Day 36)

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Change From Baseline In Mean NRS Average Pain At End Of Treatment

    Baseline, End Of Treatment (Day 36)

  • Change From Baseline In Mean NRS Worst Pain At End Of Treatment

    Baseline, End of Treatment (Day 36)

  • Change From Baseline In Mean Sleep Disruption NRS At End Of Treatment

    Baseline, End of Treatment (Day 36)

  • Subject Global Impression Of Change At Last Visit (Up To Day 36)

    Last Visit (up to Day 36)

  • Physician Global Impression Of Change At Last Visit (Up To Day 36)

    Last Visit (up to Day 36)

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Nabiximols

EXPERIMENTAL

Nabiximols was self-administered by participants as a 100 microliter (μL) oromucosal spray in the morning and evening, up to a maximum of 10 sprays per day for 5 weeks. Nabiximols oromucosal spray contained delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (27 milligram \[mg\]/milliliter \[mL\]):cannabidiol (CBD) (25 mg/mL), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavoring. Each 100 μL actuation delivered 2.7 mg THC and 2.5 mg CBD.

Drug: Nabiximols

Placebo (GA-0034)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo Comparator: Placebo (GA-0034) Placebo was self-administered by participants as a 100 μL oromucosal spray in the morning and evening, up to a maximum of 10 sprays per day for 5 weeks. Placebo oromucosal spray contained ethanol: propylene glycol (50:50)

Drug: Placebo (GA-0034)

Interventions

Also known as: Sativex®
Nabiximols
Placebo (GA-0034)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The participant had advanced cancer for which there was no known curative therapy
  • The participant had a clinical diagnosis of cancer related pain, which was not wholly alleviated with their current optimized opioid treatment
  • The participant received an optimized maintenance dose of Step 3 opioid therapy, preferably with a sustained release preparation, but also allowing a regular maintenance dose of around the clock use of immediate release preparations
  • The participant received a daily maintenance dose Step 3 opioid therapy of less than or equal to a total daily opioid dose of 500 mg/day of morphine equivalence (including maintenance and break-through opioids)
  • The participant was using no more than one type of break-through opioid analgesia

You may not qualify if:

  • The participant had any planned clinical interventions that would have affected their pain (for example, chemotherapy or radiation therapy where, in the clinical judgment of the investigator, these would be expected to affect pain)
  • The participant was using or had used cannabis or cannabinoid-based medications within 30 days of study entry and is unwilling to abstain for the duration of the study
  • The participant had experienced myocardial infarction or clinically significant cardiac dysfunction within the last 12 months or had a cardiac disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, would have put the participant at risk of a clinically significant arrhythmia or myocardial infarction
  • The participant had significantly impaired renal function
  • The participant had significantly impaired hepatic function
  • Female participants of child-bearing potential and male participants whose partner was of child-bearing potential, unless willing to ensure that they or their partner used effective contraception, for example, oral contraception, double barrier, intra-uterine device, during the study and for 3 months thereafter (however, a male condom was not to be used in conjunction with a female condom as this may not have proven effective)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (72)

Unknown Facility

Phoenix, Arizona, 85027, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Phoenix, Arizona, 85028, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

El Cajon, California, 92020, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Gilroy, California, 95020, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Brandon, Florida, 33511, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Daytona Beach, Florida, 32117, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Holiday, Florida, 34691, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jacksonville, Florida, 32257, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lynn Haven, Florida, 32444, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Stuart, Florida, 34994, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Winter Park, Florida, 32789, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Newnan, Georgia, 30265, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Shreveport, Louisiana, 71105, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55426, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kansas City, Missouri, 64132, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Berlin, New Jersey, 08009, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hendersonville, North Carolina, 28739, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, 77024, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, 77089, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Laredo, Texas, 78041, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84124, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Brussels, 1000, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Gabrovo, 5300, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Shumen, 9700, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Varna, 9010, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

České Budějovice, 370 01, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

České Budějovice, 370 87, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Hradec Králové, 500 05, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Most, 434 64, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Nová Ves pod Pleší, 262 04, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Ostrava-Poruba, 708 52, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Pilsen, 304 60, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Lünen, 44534, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Stadtroda, 07646, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Wetzlar, 35578, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Deszk, H-6772, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Kecskemét, H-6000, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Komárom, H-2900, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Miskolc, H-3501, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Nyíregyháza, H-4412, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Szekszárd, H-7100, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Rēzekne, LV-4600, Latvia

Location

Unknown Facility

Riga, LV-1079, Latvia

Location

Unknown Facility

Klaipėda, LT-92288, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Šiauliai, LT-76307, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Vilnius, LT-08660, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Bialystok, 15-250, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Bielsko-Biala, 43-300, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Gliwice, 44-101, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Poznan, 61-245, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Warsaw, 02-781, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Ponce, 00717, Puerto Rico

Location

Unknown Facility

San Juan, 00927, Puerto Rico

Location

Unknown Facility

Baia Mare, 430031, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Brăila, 810325, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Bucharest, 010976, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Craiova, 200385, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Oradea, 410469, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Satu Mare, 440055, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Suceava, 720237, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Bury, BL9 7TD, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Bury St Edmunds, IP33 2QZ, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Glasgow, G12 0YN, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Manchester, M8 5RB, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Norwich, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Weston-super-Mare, BS23 4TQ, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Lichtman AH, Lux EA, McQuade R, Rossetti S, Sanchez R, Sun W, Wright S, Kornyeyeva E, Fallon MT. Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Nabiximols Oromucosal Spray as an Adjunctive Therapy in Advanced Cancer Patients with Chronic Uncontrolled Pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2):179-188.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

    PMID: 28923526BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainCancer Pain

Interventions

nabiximols

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Medical Enquiries
Organization
GW Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2010

First Posted

December 17, 2010

Study Start

November 25, 2010

Primary Completion

July 2, 2015

Study Completion

July 2, 2015

Last Updated

April 23, 2018

Results First Posted

April 23, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-03

Locations