Comparison of Solifenacin and Oxybutynin in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder
Comparison of Oxybutynin and Solifenacin in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder: a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Null hypothesis of the trial is that there is no difference between solifenacin and oxybutynin with respect to efficacy, side effects, patient satisfaction and quality of life measures in patients with overactive bladder.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Sep 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 25, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 26, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2012
CompletedAugust 26, 2011
August 1, 2011
1 year
August 25, 2011
August 25, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Degree of improvement in overactive bladder symptoms
The main symptoms of overactive bladder are frequency, urgency, urge incontinence and nocturia (if any). The primary outcome of the trial will be comparison of the improvement of these symptoms in terms of number and severity between two study groups.
2 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To compare the degree of side effects between two study groups
2 months
Study Arms (2)
Solifenacin
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnticholinergic molecule used in the treatment of overactive bladder.
Oxybutynin
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnticholinergic molecule used in the treatment of overactive bladder.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Adana Numune Training and Research Hospitallead
- Kocaeli Universitycollaborator
- Akdeniz Universitycollaborator
- Cukurova Universitycollaborator
- Baskent Universitycollaborator
- Ankara Universitycollaborator
- University of Gaziantepcollaborator
- Inonu Universitycollaborator
- Gaziosmanpasa Universitycollaborator
- Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Turkish Republic Ministry of Health Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital
Adana, 01150, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Murat Api, M.D., Ph.D.
Turkish Republic Ministry of Health Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, M.D., Ph.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 25, 2011
First Posted
August 26, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
September 1, 2012
Study Completion
September 1, 2012
Last Updated
August 26, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-08