Therapy of the Overactive Bladder Syndrome
TOBS
Comparison of Solifenacin Combined With Pelvic Floor Muscle and Whole Body Vibration Training With Solifenacin Alone in Patients With Overactive Bladder Syndrome. - A Prospective Randomized Parallel Group Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the present study is to investigate in patients with overactive bladder syndrome (OABS) whether a combination treatment of solifenacin with pelvic floor muscle training and whole body vibration training achieves a better treatment outcome than a treatment with solifenacin alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2012
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedMay 20, 2016
May 1, 2016
2 years
January 21, 2011
May 19, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change of patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC)
The primary efficacy parameter is the change from baseline in mean score of patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC). Between-treatment differences in changes from baseline to endpoint will formally be tested using an analysis of variance (ANOVA). For the primary efficacy parameter, statistically significant superiority of solifenacin combined with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and whole body vibration training (WBVT) to solifenacin alone must be obtained.
baseline and 16 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in micturitions/24h based on a 3-day micturition diary
baseline and 16 weeks
Change of urgency episodes (grade ≥3) /24h
baseline and 16 weeks
Change in volume voided per micturition
baseline and 16 weeks
Change in number of incontinence and urge incontinence episodes/24h
baseline and 16 weeks
Change in number of pads used/24h
baseline and 16 weeks
Study Arms (2)
solifenacin 5mg, PFMT and WBVT
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to group A will receive solifenacin 5mg tablet once daily and a training programme for PFMT and WBVT once a week.
solifenacin 5mg
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects randomised to group B will receive solifenacin 5mg tablet once daily.
Interventions
solifenacin 5mg tablet once daily
pelvic floor muscle and whole body vibration training once a week
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients with symptoms of overactive bladder (urinary frequency and urgency with or without incontinence) for ≥ 3 months
- Age ≥ 18 years old
- Urinary frequency ≥ 8 micturitions on average per 24 hours during the 3-day micturition diary period
- At least 3 episodes of urgency with or without incontinence (≥ 3) during the 3-day micturition diary period
- Patient provides written informed consent
- Patient is willing to complete the micturition diary
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically significant bladder outflow obstruction at risk of urinary retention (at the discretion of the investigator)
- Significant post void residual volume (\> 200ml)
- Uncontrolled narrow angle glaucoma, urinary or gastric retention, severe ulcerative colitis, toxic megacolon, myasthenia gravis or any other medical condition which in the opinion of the investigator makes the use of anticholinergics contraindicated
- Neurological cause of abnormal detrusor activity
- Any clinically significant condition, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for the study
- Current non-drug treatment including pelvic floor muscle and whole body vibration training
- Known contraindications for whole body vibration training (cardiovascular, neurological or orthopaedic diseases, diabetes, tumor, pacemaker)
- Pregnant women or women who intend to become pregnant during the study
- Known or suspected hypersensitivity to solifenacin or lactose
- Concomitant use of a strong cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor (e.g. ketoconazole)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cantonal Hospital, Frauenfeldlead
- Astellas Pharma Inccollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Blasenzentrum, Cantonal Hospital
Frauenfeld, Thurgau, 8501, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Volker VV Viereck, physican
Cantonal Hospital, Frauenfeld
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2011
First Posted
March 15, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
January 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 20, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share