Ultrasound and Other Images of Artery Blockages
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Carotid Plaque Neovascularization
2 other identifiers
observational
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: \- Treatments for partly blocked carotid arteries are determined by a person s symptoms and by tests that show how severe the blockage is. Studies show that the material that blocks an artery is more important in spotting future problems than how tight the blockage is. Researchers want to develop better imaging studies to find which blockages are more high-risk. Objectives: \- To use imaging studies to look at high-risk carotid artery blockages. Eligibility: \- Individuals at least 21 years of age whose ultrasound exams show a major carotid artery blockage. Design:
- Participants will be screened with a medical history, physical exam, blood and urine tests, , an ultrasound scan and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan.
- Participants will have ultrasound and other scans to obtain pictures of the arteries. The scans will use drugs that may help study doctors get a better picture of the blood vessels and blockages.
- Participants will have followup phone calls yearly for 3 years. If a participant later has surgery to remove the blockage, the surgeon will save part of it for future study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jul 2011
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 29, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 18, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 27, 2016
CompletedDecember 3, 2019
April 27, 2016
August 17, 2011
November 30, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult subjects age greater than or equal to 21 years
- Able to give written informed consent
- Prior clinical ultrasound exam showing a carotid stenosis of greater than or equal to 50 percent
- Adult subjects age greater than or equal to 21 years
- Able to give written informed consent
- Prior clinical ultrasound exam showing a carotid stenosis suspected of causing symptoms and/or clinical recommendation to undergo carotid endarterectomy
You may not qualify if:
- Atrial fibrillation or other irregular rhythm that would preclude adequate image acquisition
- Subjects with a contraindication for the ultrasound contrast agent.
- Subjects with pacemakers, defibrillators, cerebral aneurysm clips, neural stimulators, ear implants or other clinical contra-indications for magnetic resonance scanning will be excluded from the MRI portion of the study.
- Subjects with an estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] less than 30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) body surface area will be excluded from the contrast MRI portion of the study but will still undergo non-contrast imaging.
- The eGFR will be used to estimate renal function if reported by the laboratory. Otherwise, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) can be based on the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation (see below) in subjects with stable renal function. This formula is not applicable to subjects with acute renal insufficiency: eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m(2)) equal to 175 times (serum creatinine)-1.154 times (age)-0.203 times 0.742 (if the subject is female) times 1.212 (if the subject is black).
- Pregnant or lactating women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Related Publications (3)
Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, Badimon JJ, Stefanadis C, Moreno P, Pasterkamp G, Fayad Z, Stone PH, Waxman S, Raggi P, Madjid M, Zarrabi A, Burke A, Yuan C, Fitzgerald PJ, Siscovick DS, de Korte CL, Aikawa M, Juhani Airaksinen KE, Assmann G, Becker CR, Chesebro JH, Farb A, Galis ZS, Jackson C, Jang IK, Koenig W, Lodder RA, March K, Demirovic J, Navab M, Priori SG, Rekhter MD, Bahr R, Grundy SM, Mehran R, Colombo A, Boerwinkle E, Ballantyne C, Insull W Jr, Schwartz RS, Vogel R, Serruys PW, Hansson GK, Faxon DP, Kaul S, Drexler H, Greenland P, Muller JE, Virmani R, Ridker PM, Zipes DP, Shah PK, Willerson JT. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 2003 Oct 7;108(14):1664-72. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.97.
PMID: 14530185BACKGROUNDLorenz MW, Markus HS, Bots ML, Rosvall M, Sitzer M. Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2007 Jan 30;115(4):459-67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.628875. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
PMID: 17242284BACKGROUNDCostanzo P, Perrone-Filardi P, Vassallo E, Paolillo S, Cesarano P, Brevetti G, Chiariello M. Does carotid intima-media thickness regression predict reduction of cardiovascular events? A meta-analysis of 41 randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Dec 7;56(24):2006-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.059.
PMID: 21126642BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vandana Sachdev, M.D.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2011
First Posted
August 18, 2011
Study Start
July 29, 2011
Study Completion
April 27, 2016
Last Updated
December 3, 2019
Record last verified: 2016-04-27