Response Options to Blood Volume Monitoring in Fluid Overloaded Hemodialysis Patients
BVM-Reg
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing, in Fluid-Overloaded Hemodialysis Patients, Three Strategies of Fluid Removal: Regulation of Ultrafiltration and Dialysate Conductivity, Regulation of Ultrafiltration and Temperature, and Standard Hemodialysis
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Data generated with the body composition monitor (BCM, Fresenius) show based on bioimpedance technology, that chronic fluid overload in hemodialysis patients is associated with poor survival. However, removing excess fluid by lowering dry weight can be accompanied by intradialytic and postdialytic complications. Here, we aim at testing the hypothesis that, in comparison to conventional hemodialysis, blood-volume monitored regulation of ultrafiltration and dialysate conductivity (UCR) and/or regulation of ultrafiltration and temperature (UTR) will decrease complications when ultrafiltration volumes are systematically increased in fluid overloaded hemodialysis patients. Methods/Design: BCM-measurements yield results on fluid overload (in liters), relative to extracellular water (ECW). In this prospective, multicenter, triple-arm, parallel group, cross-over, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we use BCM-measurements, routinely introduced in our 3 maintenance hemodialysis centers shortly prior to the start of the study, to recruit 60 hemodialysis patients with fluid overload (defined as ≥15% ECW). Patients are randomized 1:1:1 into UCR, UTR and conventional hemodialysis groups. BCM-determined, 'final' dry weight is set as -7% ECW postdialysis, and reached by reducing the previous dry weight, in steps of 0.1 kg per 10 kg body weight, during 12 hemodialysis sessions (one study phase). In case of intradialytic complications, dry weight reduction is decreased, according to a pre-specified algorithm. A comparison of intra- and postdialytic complications among study groups constitutes the primary endpoint. In addition, we will assess relative weight reduction, changes in residual renal function, quality of life measures, and predialysis levels of various laboratory parameters including C-reactive protein, troponin T, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, before and after the first study phase (secondary outcome parameters). Discussion: Patients are not requested to revert to their initial degree of fluid overload after each study phase, Therefore, the cross-over design of the present study merely serves the purpose of secondary end-point evaluation, for example to determine patient choice of treatment modality. Previous studies on blood volume monitoring have yielded inconsistent results. Since we include only patients with BCM-determined fluid overload, we expect a benefit for all study participants, due to strict fluid management which decreases the mortality risk of hemodialysis patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2012
CompletedSeptember 3, 2012
August 1, 2012
11 months
August 12, 2011
August 30, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome measure is the number of intradialytic complications in each of the three study groups, only during the first study phase.
The study sample will consist of 60 patients with ECV ≥15%, by BCM-measurement. For the primary endpoint analysis, we will assess the differences in intradialytic complications between the three study groups, only during the first study phase. The UCR and UTR groups will be tested against the conventional HD control group, and afterwards against one another.
4 weeks for one study phase
Secondary Outcomes (1)
(see detailed description listed above, under primary objectives)
(as above)
Study Arms (3)
UCR
ACTIVE COMPARATORregulation of ultrafiltration and conductivity
UTR
ACTIVE COMPARATORregulation of ultrafiltration and temperature
conventional dialysis
NO INTERVENTIONdry weight reduction without BVM
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- HD \>3 months
- Fluid overload ≥15% of extracellular volume (ECV) predialysis, as determined by BCM-measurement, after one of the 2 the midweek interdialytic intervals
- Informed consent of the patient
You may not qualify if:
- none, except those specified by the Declaration of Helsinki
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Marcus Saemannlead
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Related Publications (2)
Antlanger M, Josten P, Kammer M, Exner I, Lorenz-Turnheim K, Eigner M, Paul G, Klauser-Braun R, Sunder-Plassmann G, Saemann MD, Hecking M. Blood volume-monitored regulation of ultrafiltration to decrease the dry weight in fluid-overloaded hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Nephrol. 2017 Jul 17;18(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0639-x.
PMID: 28716046DERIVEDHecking M, Antlanger M, Winnicki W, Reiter T, Werzowa J, Haidinger M, Weichhart T, Polaschegg HD, Josten P, Exner I, Lorenz-Turnheim K, Eigner M, Paul G, Klauser-Braun R, Horl WH, Sunder-Plassmann G, Saemann MD. Blood volume-monitored regulation of ultrafiltration in fluid-overloaded hemodialysis patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012 Jun 8;13:79. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-79.
PMID: 22682149DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marcus D Säemann, MD
Medical University of Vienna, Austria, 1090 Vienna
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ass. Prof. Dr. Marcus Säemann
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2011
First Posted
August 15, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
August 1, 2012
Last Updated
September 3, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-08