Efficacy and Safety of TAK-875 in Combination With Sitagliptin in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Factorial, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of 25 mg and 50 mg of TAK-875 in Combination With Sitagliptin 100 mg in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
2 other identifiers
interventional
368
1 country
80
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of TAK-875, once daily (QD), in combination with sitagliptin QD in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Started Aug 2011
80 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 10, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2012
CompletedApril 4, 2016
March 1, 2016
1 year
August 10, 2011
March 4, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 12 relative to baseline.
Baseline and Week 12.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change from Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose
Baseline and Week 12.
Study Arms (6)
Placebo QD
PLACEBO COMPARATORTAK-875 25 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALTAK-875 50 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALSitagliptin 100 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALTAK-875 25 mg QD + Sitagliptin 100 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALTAK-875 50 mg QD + Sitagliptin 100 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
TAK-875 and sitagliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 weeks.
Sitagliptin 100 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 weeks.
TAK-875 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and sitagliptin 100 mg tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- In the opinion of the investigator, the participant is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements.
- The participant or, when applicable, the participant's legally acceptable representative signs and dates a written, informed consent form and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures.
- The participant has either:
- A historical diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) without the chronic use (defined as \>7 days) of anti-diabetic therapy within 8 weeks prior to Screening, and with at least an 8-week documented history of a diet and exercise plan at Screening OR,
- A historical diagnosis of T2DM and stable on at least 1500 mg per day (or maximum tolerated dose) of metformin as monotherapy for at least 8 weeks at Screening. Participants on a stable dose of metformin who enter the study will continue on the same dose of metformin throughout the duration of the study.
- The participant is a man or woman and aged 18 to 80 years, inclusive.
- The participant's body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2) at Screening is ≥23 and ≤45.
- The participant has an glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level at Screening between 7.5% and 10.0%, inclusive, if on metformin and between 7.5% to 10.9%, inclusive, if treated with diet and exercise alone.
- The participant has a fasting plasma glucose level \<14.4 mmol/L (\<260 mg/dL), at Screening.
- The participant has a fasting C-peptide concentration ≥0.26 nmol/L (≥0.8 ng/mL) at Screening.
- If the participant takes any chronic, non-excluded medications, the dose of these medications must have been stable (no change in dose or drug) for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening.
- The participant is able and willing to monitor their glucose levels with a home glucose monitor and consistently record his or her own blood glucose concentrations according to the given instructions.
- A male participant who is nonsterilized and sexually active with a female partner of childbearing potential agrees to use adequate contraception from signing of informed consent throughout the duration of the study and for 30 days after last dose.
- A female participant of childbearing potential who is sexually active with a nonsterilized male partner agrees to use routinely adequate contraception from signing of informed consent throughout the duration of the study.
- A female participant of childbearing potential must have a negative serum human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) pregnancy test at Screening (Visit 1) and at Placebo Run-in (Visit 2). A negative urine HCG pregnancy test is also required at Randomization (Visit 3), prior to administration of the first dose of double-blind study medication.
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- The participant has received any investigational compound within 4 weeks prior to Screening.
- The participant has been enrolled in a previous TAK-875 study.
- The participant is an immediate family member, study site employee, or is in a dependent relationship with a study site employee who is involved in conduct of this study (eg, spouse, parent, child, sibling) or may consent under duress.
- The participant has a history of hypersensitivity or allergies to TAK-875 or sitagliptin, or their excipients.
- The participant has a history of drug abuse (defined as any illicit drug use) or a history of alcohol abuse within 2 years prior to the Screening visit.
- The participant has a history of cancer that has been in remission for \<5 years prior to Screening (a history of basal cell carcinoma or stage 1 squamous cell carcinoma of the skin is allowed).
- The participant has systolic blood pressure ≥150 mm Hg or diastolic pressure ≥90 mm Hg at Screening (Visit 1) or Baseline (Visit 3) (as confirmed by repeat measurement 30 minutes after initial measurement).
- The participant has a creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level ≥5x the upper limit of normal (ULN) at Screening.
- The participant has a hemoglobin level of ≤12 g/dL (120 gm/L) for men and ≤10 g/dL (100 gm/L) for women at Screening.
- The participant has ALT and/or AST levels ≥2.5x ULN at Screening.
- The participant has a total bilirubin level \> ULN at Screening.
- The participant has a serum triglyceride concentration ≥4.5 mmol/L (≥400 mg/dL) at Screening.
- The participant has an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60mL/min using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation at Screening.
- The participant has a documented history or concurrent signs of uncontrolled (not euthyroid) thyroid disease (eg, autoimmune thyroid diseases such as Graves disease and Hashimoto thyroiditis or active thyroid nodules).
- The participant has a history of pancreatitis.
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (80)
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Brimingham, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Chandler, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Glendale, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Green Valley, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Buena Park, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Irvine, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Norwalk, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Paramount, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Ramon, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Spring Valley, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Vista, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Walnut Creek, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Westlake Village, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Lakewood, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Brandon, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
DeLand, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Hallandale, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Jupiter, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Longwood, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami Lakes, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Roswell, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Suwanee, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Boise, Idaho, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Valparaiso, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Crestview Hills, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Bangor, Maine, United States
Unknown Facility
Elkridge, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Brockton, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Chelsea, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Olive Branch, Mississippi, United States
Unknown Facility
Berlin, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Margate City, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Toms River, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Brooklyn, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Buffalo, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Calabash, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Morehead City, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Akron, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Lyndhurst, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Marion, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Willoughby Hills, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Broomall, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Feasterville, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Fleetwood, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Cranston, Rhode Island, United States
Unknown Facility
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Crossville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Irving, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
North Richland Hills, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Pearland, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Seattle, Washington, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sr. Medical Director Clinical Science
Takeda
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 10, 2011
First Posted
August 11, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
August 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 4, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03