Study on Paclitaxel Plus Topotecan in Comparison With Topotecan Plus Cisplatin in Recurrent or Persistent Cervical Carcinoma
AGO-Zervix-1
A Prospective, Randomized Phase III Study to Compare the Effects of Paclitaxel and Topotecan to Those of Cisplatin and Topotecan for Treatment of Patients With Recurrent and Persistent Cervical Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
312
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Current planning for studies involving patients with recurrent, persistent, or metastasized cervical cancer must take into consideration that up to 75% of all patients are assumed to have already been treated with cisplatin in conjunction with radiation therapy. It seems questionable to continue to treat patients with cisplatin when cancer has recurred. Thus, it is important to seek alternative active combinations. The studies GOG 169 and 179 demonstrated that a combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin was superior to a cisplatin monotherapy with respect to therapeutic response and progression-free survival, as was a combination of topotecan and cisplatin with respect to therapeutic response, progression-free survival, and total survival. To achieve further improvement in total survival and to answer questions regarding the value of using a platinum-free combination, we propose that a study should be conducted to compare the efficacy of a platinum-free combination of paclitaxel and topotecan to a combination of cisplatin and topotecan.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Sep 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 27, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedApril 12, 2012
September 1, 2006
5.8 years
July 27, 2011
April 11, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in target lesion according to RECIST 1.0
week 12
Study Arms (2)
Arm B: Cisplatin/Topotecane
ACTIVE COMPARATORTopotecan 0.75 mg/m2/d i.v. on Days 1- 3 in combination with Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1, q 21 d
Arm A: Paclitaxel/Topotecan
EXPERIMENTALPaclitaxel 70 mg/m2/d i.v. on Days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with Topotecan 1.75 mg/m2/d i.v. on Days 1, 8, and 15, q 28 d
Interventions
Paclitaxel 70 mg/m2/d i.v. on Days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with Topotecan 1.75 mg/m2/d i.v. on Days 1, 8, and 15, q 28 d
Topotecan 0.75 mg/m2/d i.v. on Days 1- 3 in combination with Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1, q 21 d
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must have a histologically confirmed recurrent, persistent, or metastasized squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma of the cervix, for which a curative treatment by operation and/or radiation therapy is not possible.
- Patients must have been previously treated with cisplatin in the context of radiochemotherapy.
- All patients must present with measurable disease. Measurable disease is defined as a minimum of one lesion that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest dimension to be recorded). Each lesion must measure ≥ 20 mm when measured by conventional techniques, including palpation, x-ray, CT, and MRI, or ≥ 10 mm when measured by spiral CT. Patients must have at least one "target lesion" that can be used to evaluate response according to RECIST criteria during this study.
- When a biopsy is performed, it should be performed on this lesion. A lesion outside of the irradiated area should ideally be selected as the "target lesion" on patients who have tumors both inside and outside a previously irradiated area. A previously irradiated lesion may only be considered as a "target lesion" if, after the radiation therapy had been completed, this lesion objectively led to a diagnosis of recurrence, or progress specific to this lesion was observed.
- Patients must display the following:
- Sufficient hematologic function: absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.
- /μl; granulocytes \> 3,000/μl; thrombocytes ≥ 100,000/μl.
- Sufficient renal function: serum creatinine ≤ 1.2 mg/dl. In patients with a serum A prospective, randomized phase III study to compare the effects of Paclitaxel and Topotecan to those of Cisplatin and Topotecan for treatment of patients with recurrent or persistent cervical cancer Page 24 Study Protocol Version 1.1 dated 09/25/2006 creatinine of \> 1.2 mg/dl, the results of a 24-hour creatinine clearance must yield a level \> 50 cm3/min for eligibility.
- Sufficient liver function: bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times the institutional upper limit of normal, GOT, alkaline phosphatase ≤ 3 times the institutional upper limit of normal.
- Patients must display an ECOG performance status of 0-2 (Karnofsky \> 60%).
- Patients must have recovered from the aftereffects of any surgery, radiation therapy, or chemotherapy. A minimum of six weeks must have passed since the last administration of chemotherapy, and at least three weeks must have passed since the last treatment with radiation alone.
- Patients must have signed an official consent document which also authorizes the release of personal health information. Patients unable to give their consent independently may not participate in the study.
- Patients must be free of clinically significant infection.
- Patients must be 18 years of age or older.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with bilateral hydronephrosis which cannot be alleviated by ureteral stents or percutaneous drainage. Patients with a serum creatinine \> 1.2 mg/dl but \< 1.5 mg/dl and a 24-hour creatinine clearance result of \< 50 cm3/min. Patients with a serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dl. A prospective, randomized phase III study to compare the effects of Paclitaxel and Topotecan to those of Cisplatin and Topotecan for treatment of patients with recurrent or persistent cervical cancer Study Protocol Version 1.1 dated 09/25/2006 Page 25
- Patients who have received prior chemotherapy, unless the chemotherapy was administered with concomitant radiation therapy.
- Patients who are pregnant or lactating.
- Patients with craniospinal metastases.
- Patients with a concomitant malignant disease, with the exception of nonmelanoma skin cancer.
- Patients with a previous invasive malignant disease (other than nonmelanoma skin cancer) showing evidence of this disease within the last 5 years, or for whom the therapy to be administered during this study is contraindicated due to previous treatment received for this malignant disease.
- Patients who are participating in another clinical study at the same time or who will have done so up to 30 days before the planned end of this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Institut fuer Frauengesundheitlead
- GlaxoSmithKlinecollaborator
- Schantl Pharma Service, Germanycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Universitätsfrauenklinik
Erlangen, Bavaria, 91054, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Gass P, Thiel FC, Haberle L, Ackermann S, Theuser AK, Hummel N, Boehm S, Kimmig R, Reinthaller A, Becker S, Hilpert F, Janni W, Vergote I, Harter P, Emons J, Hein A, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Poschke P; AGO Uterus Commission. Primary results of the AGO-Zervix-1 Study: A prospective, randomized phase III study to compare the effects of paclitaxel and topotecan with those of cisplatin and topotecan in the treatment of patients with recurrent and persistent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Apr;183:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.03.002. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
PMID: 38490057DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Falk Thiel, Dr. med.
Frauenklinik Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2011
First Posted
July 29, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2006
Primary Completion
June 1, 2012
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 12, 2012
Record last verified: 2006-09