HAART Model 300 Annuloplasty Ring
A Prospective, Non-randomized, Multi-center Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the HAART Model 300 Annuloplasty Ring When Used to Surgically Repair a Leaking Aortic Valve Using a 3-D Intra-annular Mounting Frame
3 other identifiers
interventional
18
3 countries
4
Brief Summary
This investigation is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the HAART model 300 annuloplasty ring when used to surgically repair a leaking aortic valve using a 3-D intra-annular mounting frame
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 21, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 22, 2016
CompletedJanuary 13, 2017
November 1, 2016
1.2 years
July 21, 2011
September 30, 2016
November 27, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Primary Safety Outcome Measure: Event-free Survival
Event-free survival is defined as survival free from device-related death
1 month postprocedure
Primary Safety Outcome Measure: Event-free Survival
Event-free survival is defined as survival free from device-related death
2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 6 Months Postprocedure
Aortic valvular regurgitation assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)
6 months postprocedure
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 2 Years Postprocedure
Aortic valvular regurgitation assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)
2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Secondary Outcomes (27)
Implant Procedure Success
discharge or 14 days postprocedure, whichever comes first
Implant Procedure Success
2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Actuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events
1 month postprocedure
Actuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events
2 years postprocedure
Event-free Survival
6 months postprocedure
- +22 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
EXPERIMENTALImplantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair
Interventions
Implantation of device for aortic valve repair
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject is 50 years old or older
- The subject has a tricuspid aortic valve morphology
- Patients with documented severe aortic insufficiency with aortic annular dilation without severe concomitant aortic stenosis
- Patients referred to center for documented moderate to severe Chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) associated with annular dilatation with or without cusp prolapse of one, two, or all three leaflets
- Patients with or without Sinotubular Junction (STJ) dilatation or aortic root aneurysms
- Patients who are free of coronary disease or those with evidence of minor stable (1-2 vessel) coronary disease
- Subject is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations, including transesophageal echocardiography if there are inadequate images by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to assess the aortic valve
- The subject has signed the written informed consent
- The subject agrees to return for all follow-up evaluations for the duration of the study (i.e. geographically stable
- The subject is New York Hospital Association (NYHA) class II or III
You may not qualify if:
- The subject has preexisting valve prosthesis in the atrial, the mitral, pulmonary, and/or tricuspid position
- The subject requires an additional valve replacement
- The subject's aortic valve morphology is not tricuspid
- The subject has active endocarditis
- Heavily calcified valves
- Valvular retraction with severely reduced mobility
- The subject has mixed stenosis and regurgitation of the aortic valve with predominant stenosis
- The subject requires a repair of the mitral or tricuspid valve with the use of an annuloplasty device
- Leukopenia
- Acute anemia (Hb \< 9mg%)
- Platelet count \<100,000 cell/mm3
- Need for emergency surgery for any reason
- History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or the subject refuses blood transfusions
- Active infection requiring antibiotic therapy (if temporary illness, subjects may enroll 4 weeks after discontinuation of antibiotics)
- Subjects in whom transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is contraindicated
- +15 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
University Hospital Gasthuisberg
Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
Institut klinicke a experimantalni mediciny
Prague, 1958/9, Czechia
German Heart Institute
Berlin, 13353, Germany
German Heart Center Munich
Munich, 80636, Germany
Related Publications (4)
Mazzitelli D, Fischlein T, Rankin JS, Choi YH, Stamm C, Pfeiffer S, Pirk J, Detter C, Kroll J, Beyersdorf F, Griffin CD, Shrestha M, Nobauer C, Crooke PS, Schreiber C, Lange R. Geometric ring annuloplasty as an adjunct to aortic valve repair: clinical investigation of the HAART 300 device. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Mar;49(3):987-93. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv234. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
PMID: 26156945DERIVEDMazzitelli D, Stamm C, Rankin JS, Pfeiffer S, Fischlein T, Pirk J, Choi YH, Detter C, Kroll J, Beyersdorf F, Shrestha M, Schreiber C, Lange R. Leaflet reconstructive techniques for aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Dec;98(6):2053-60. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.052. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
PMID: 25468084DERIVEDMazzitelli D, Stamm C, Rankin JS, Nobauer C, Pirk J, Meuris B, Crooke PS, Wagner A, Beavan LA, Griffin CD, Powers D, Nasseri B, Schreiber C, Hetzer R, Lange R. Hemodynamic outcomes of geometric ring annuloplasty for aortic valve repair: a 4-center pilot trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jul;148(1):168-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.031. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
PMID: 24113022DERIVEDMazzitelli D, Nobauer C, Rankin JS, Badiu CC, Dorfmeister M, Crooke PS, Wagner A, Schreiber C, Lange R. Early results of a novel technique for ring-reinforced aortic valve and root restoration. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Mar;45(3):426-30. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt407. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
PMID: 23959743DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- John Wheeler
- Organization
- Biostable Science and Engineering, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christof Stamm, M.D.
German Heart Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 21, 2011
First Posted
July 22, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
April 1, 2013
Study Completion
September 1, 2014
Last Updated
January 13, 2017
Results First Posted
November 22, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-11