Non-pharmacological Resources in Assisting Labor
Application of Non-pharmacological Resources in Assisting Labor: Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed project will be conducted to evaluate the influence of application resources associated with non-pharmacological during labor for pain relief and accelerated phase of expansion. Although mothers' access to resources for non-pharmacological pain relief during labor is recommended, is not seen as the application of routine obstetric practice, although it has been demonstrated benefits and scientific evidence with your application. It is believed that the implementation of associated application of non-pharmacological resources in assisting the labor can be introduced into daily practice in various hospitals in the country, minimizing pain and favoring the shorter duration of labor, decrease in use of painkillers and inductors, resulting in a reduction of complications, improves the comfort of the mother making her birth experience more satisfying and rewarding, being assisted with security and trained by multidisciplinary teams.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 30, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 19, 2019
CompletedJuly 19, 2019
May 1, 2019
9 months
June 30, 2011
May 18, 2017
May 8, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Relief
The Visual Analogue Scale - VAS - was used to measure the intensity of the pain described by the patients during the study. The patient was requested do mark a dot in a straight line, measuring 100mm, being a 0 (Zero) no pain and 100 the most intense pain. The researcher then would measure the estimated pain intensity in millimeters. The pain intensity was measured in all three phases before and after each procedure assigned to each group. The phases and their respective procedures were: * Phase I: 4-5cm of cervical dilation (pelvic mobility in exercise ball) * Phase II: 5-6cm of cervical dilation (lumbosacral massage) * Phase III: 7cm or higher cervical dilation (warm shower)
ten hours
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Evolution of Labor
10 hours
Moment That Women Requested Analgesia During the Active Phase of Labor
10 hours
Number of Women Who Received Pharmacological Analgesia
10 hours
Type of Delivery
10 hours
Number of Participants Whose Neonates Had:
10 hours
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPregnant women who receive assistance from the routine CRSM MATER care, not being assisted by the physiotherapist, but that will be evaluated at the same time in the intervention group.
Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALPregnant women who receive the application the combination of non-pharmacological resources according to cervical dilation: pelvic mobility , lumbosacral massage and warm shower.
Interventions
A sequence of non-pharmacological resources were applied to the patient by the researcher according to uterine cervical dilation, as follows: * Pelvic mobility on the exercise ball oriented and accompanied by the researcher for 40 minutes; * Lumbosacral massage for a period of 40 minutes, when dilation was between 5 and 6 cm. During the procedure, the woman in labor was allowed to freely choose the most comfortable position; and, * Warm shower with the water flow directed to the lower-back of the woman in labor, for 40 minutes, when uterine cervical dilation was equal to or higher than 7cm.
Routine care of the institution performed by the staff, without the presence of the researcher that included offering a balanced meal, continuous support with the presence of a partner or family throughout labor, use of oxytocin when prescribed by the staff, use of drug analgesia when requested by the patient.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primigravida;
- Pregnancy only;
- Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks;
- Presentation fetal head
- Chorioamniotic intact membranes
- Working with spontaneous onset of labor
- Admission at the beginning of active phase dilation (4-5 cm)
- Lack of maternal and fetal pathologies
- Literacy - primary education
- Absence of cognitive problems
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women admitted for induction of labor
- Rupture premature or early of chorioamniotic membranes
- Use of uterotonic drugs before the active phase
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Referral Center Women's Health - Mater
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
Related Publications (2)
Huntley AL, Coon JT, Ernst E. Complementary and alternative medicine for labor pain: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.008.
PMID: 15295342BACKGROUNDGallo RBS, Santana LS, Marcolin AC, Duarte G, Quintana SM. Sequential application of non-pharmacological interventions reduces the severity of labour pain, delays use of pharmacological analgesia, and improves some obstetric outcomes: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2018 Jan;64(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
PMID: 29289579DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Silvana Maria Quintana
- Organization
- University of São Paulo
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Silvana M Quintana, professor
Faculty of Medicine of São Paulo University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2011
First Posted
July 7, 2011
Study Start
October 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2012
Study Completion
July 1, 2012
Last Updated
July 19, 2019
Results First Posted
July 19, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05