Combined Spinal-Epidural Versus Traditional Labor Epidural
1 other identifier
interventional
127
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study to compare the use of spinal-epidural versus traditional labor epidural on maternal and fetal effects. The hope is to determine the safest and most effective epidural method of relieving pain during labor.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Oct 2003
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 8, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2006
CompletedMarch 18, 2008
March 1, 2008
2.9 years
September 6, 2005
March 17, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Adverse fetal effects: fetal bradycardia and abnormal fetal heart rate patterns
during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Average change in systolic blood pressure
during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia
Average change in mean blood pressure
during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia
Blood pressure differences between the upper and lower extremities
during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia
Efficacy of analgesia as rated by the visual analog pain scale
during the 60 minutes after analgesic placement
Pruritus
through the first day following placement of analgesia
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
CSE
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects assigned to this group will receive "combined spinal-epidural" (CSE) to relieve pain during labor. For CSE, subjects receive a small amount of a local anesthetic and a small amount of a narcotic pain killer directly into the spinal canal (a smaller amount than is given for traditional epidural), followed by a small amount of both of these medications that is continuously infused into the epidural space through a catheter that is left in place. CSE is not experimental.
Traditional Epidural
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects assigned to this group will receive "traditional epidural" to relieve pain during labor. For the traditional epidural, subjects receive a small amount of a local anesthetic and a small amount of a narcotic pain killer into the epidural space, followed by a small amount of both of these medications that is continuously infused into the epidural space through a catheter that is left in place. The traditional epidural is not experimental.
Interventions
Bupivacaine 0.25% x 1 cc + Fentanyl 20 mcg, followed by infusion of Bupivacaine 0.0625% with Fentanyl 2 mcg/mL at 12 cc/hr
Bupivacaine 0.0625% with Fentanyl 2 mcg/mL x 15 cc, followed by infusion of Bupivacaine 0.0625% with Fentanyl 2 mcg/mL at 12 cc/hr
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is able to read, understand and voluntarily sign the approved informed consent form (ICF) prior to any study- specific procedure;
- Must be between 18 to 50 years of age.
- Must be carrying a singleton fetus at term.
- Must have less than a body mass index of 40.
- Must be in labor, or is having a medical induction of labor.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient who has chronic renal disease, pre-existing hypertension, or pre-eclampsia.
- Patient who is undergoing an elective cesarean delivery
- Patient who has a presence of non-reassuring fetal status
- Patient who has an abnormal or non-reassuring fetal heart rate (FHR) pattern
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
New York-Presbyterian Hospital; Weill Medical College of Cornell
New York, New York, 10065, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel W. Skupski, M.D.
Obstetrics & Gynecology; Weill Medical College of Cornell - New York Presbyterian Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Klaus Kjaer-Pedersen, M.D.
Anesthesiology; Weill Medical College of Cornell - New York Presbyterian Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2005
First Posted
September 8, 2005
Study Start
October 1, 2003
Primary Completion
September 1, 2006
Study Completion
September 1, 2006
Last Updated
March 18, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-03