Ketamine Versus Co-administration of Ketamine and Propofol for Procedural Sedation in a Pediatric Emergency Department
Comparison of Ketamine Versus Co-Administration of Ketamine and Propofol for Procedural Sedation in a Pediatric Emergency Department
1 other identifier
interventional
183
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the co-administration of intravenous ketamine and propofol to intravenous ketamine as a single agent for procedural sedation in the pediatric emergency department. The investigators hypothesize that patients receiving co-administration of ketamine and propofol will have a lower rate of adverse events, compared to patients receiving ketamine for procedural sedation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jan 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 4, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 17, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 3, 2017
CompletedDecember 8, 2017
November 1, 2017
3 years
May 20, 2011
December 3, 2015
November 6, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Frequency of Adverse Events
We will record all adverse events during the sedation, and then perform a follow-up call to determine if any additional adverse events occured after discharge.
From enrollment through completion of follow-up, up to 7 days
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Recovery Time
Once Vancouver Sedation Recovery Scale Score reaches 18 or greater, on average less than 1 hour
Efficacy of Sedation
After procedure is completed, on average less than 1 hour
Parent Satisfaction
After procedure is completed, on average less than 1 hour
Physician Performing Procedure Satisfaction
After procedure is completed, on average less than 1 hour
Nurse Satisfaction
After procedure is completed, on average less than 1 hour
Study Arms (2)
Ketamine Alone
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1.0 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) ketamine with additional doses of 0.5 mg/kg ketamine as needed (maximum single dose based on 100 kilogram (kg) person)
Ketamine Co-Administered with Propofol
EXPERIMENTAL0.5 mg/kg ketamine and 0.5 mg/kg propofol with additional doses of 0.25 mg/kg ketamine and 0.25 mg/kg propofol as needed (maximum single dose based on 100 kg person)
Interventions
1.0 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) ketamine with additional doses of 0.5 mg/kg ketamine as needed (maximum single dose based on 100 kilogram (kg) person)
0.5 mg/kg ketamine and 0.5 mg/kg propofol with additional doses of 0.25 mg/kg ketamine and 0.25 mg/kg propofol as needed (maximum single dose based on 100 kg person)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ages \> 3 years and \< 21 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II
- Fracture or dislocation requiring reduction under procedural sedation with ketamine as deemed by the attending emergency medicine physician
- Parent/Legal Guardian or Patient (if 18 years of age or older) has already given verbal consent for procedural sedation as part of standard care for their condition
You may not qualify if:
- Hypertension (Blood Pressure \> 95th percentile for age)
- Glaucoma or acute globe injury
- Increased intracranial pressure or central nervous system mass lesion
- Porphyria
- Previous allergic reaction to ketamine
- Previous allergic reaction to Propofol or its components including soybean oil, glycerol, egg lecithin, and disodium edentate
- Disorders of lipid metabolism including primary hyperlipoproteinemia, diabetic hyperlipemia, or pancreatitis
- Mitochondrial myopathies or disorders of electron transport
- Pregnancy
- Parent, guardian or patient unwilling/unable to provide informed consent/assent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Related Publications (13)
Roback MG, Wathen JE, Bajaj L, Bothner JP. Adverse events associated with procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department: a comparison of common parenteral drugs. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jun;12(6):508-13. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.12.009.
PMID: 15930401BACKGROUNDWathen JE, Roback MG, Mackenzie T, Bothner JP. Does midazolam alter the clinical effects of intravenous ketamine sedation in children? A double-blind, randomized, controlled, emergency department trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Dec;36(6):579-88. doi: 10.1067/mem.2000.111131.
PMID: 11097698BACKGROUNDAkin A, Esmaoglu A, Guler G, Demircioglu R, Narin N, Boyaci A. Propofol and propofol-ketamine in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Pediatr Cardiol. 2005 Sep-Oct;26(5):553-7. doi: 10.1007/s00246-004-0707-4.
PMID: 16132313BACKGROUNDAkin A, Esmaoglu A, Tosun Z, Gulcu N, Aydogan H, Boyaci A. Comparison of propofol with propofol-ketamine combination in pediatric patients undergoing auditory brainstem response testing. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Nov;69(11):1541-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.04.011. Epub 2005 Jun 3.
PMID: 15936092BACKGROUNDAkin A, Guler G, Esmaoglu A, Bedirli N, Boyaci A. A comparison of fentanyl-propofol with a ketamine-propofol combination for sedation during endometrial biopsy. J Clin Anesth. 2005 May;17(3):187-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.06.019.
PMID: 15896585BACKGROUNDBarbi E, Marchetti F, Gerarduzzi T, Neri E, Gagliardo A, Sarti A, Ventura A. Pretreatment with intravenous ketamine reduces propofol injection pain. Paediatr Anaesth. 2003 Nov;13(9):764-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.01150.x.
PMID: 14617116BACKGROUNDSharieff GQ, Trocinski DR, Kanegaye JT, Fisher B, Harley JR. Ketamine-propofol combination sedation for fracture reduction in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Dec;23(12):881-4. doi: 10.1097/pec.0b013e31815c9df6.
PMID: 18091596BACKGROUNDWillman EV, Andolfatto G. A prospective evaluation of "ketofol" (ketamine/propofol combination) for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jan;49(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.002. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
PMID: 17059854BACKGROUNDCravero JP, Beach ML, Blike GT, Gallagher SM, Hertzog JH; Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. The incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia with propofol for procedures outside the operating room: a report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Anesth Analg. 2009 Mar;108(3):795-804. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818fc334.
PMID: 19224786BACKGROUNDAmerican Academy of Pediatrics; American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; Cote CJ, Wilson S; Work Group on Sedation. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: an update. Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):2587-602. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2780.
PMID: 17142550BACKGROUNDBhatt M, Kennedy RM, Osmond MH, Krauss B, McAllister JD, Ansermino JM, Evered LM, Roback MG; Consensus Panel on Sedation Research of Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC) and the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Consensus-based recommendations for standardizing terminology and reporting adverse events for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;53(4):426-435.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.09.030. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
PMID: 19026467BACKGROUNDMacnab AJ, Levine M, Glick N, Phillips N, Susak L, Elliott M. The Vancouver sedative recovery scale for children: validation and reliability of scoring based on videotaped instruction. Can J Anaesth. 1994 Oct;41(10):913-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03010934.
PMID: 8001210BACKGROUNDBieri D, Reeve RA, Champion DG, Addicoat L, Ziegler JB. The Faces Pain Scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: development, initial validation, and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties. Pain. 1990 May;41(2):139-150. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90018-9.
PMID: 2367140BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Keith Weisz
- Organization
- Ucolorado
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lalit Bajaj, MD, MPH
University of Colorado, Denver
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Keith Weisz, MD
University of Colorado, Denver
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2011
First Posted
July 4, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
January 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 3, 2017
Last Updated
December 8, 2017
Results First Posted
February 17, 2016
Record last verified: 2017-11