Study Stopped
based on interim analysis results
Transarterial RAdioembolization Versus ChemoEmbolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
TRACE
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a primary malignant tumor of the liver that accounts for an important health problem worldwide. In only 10% - 15% of all patients with HCC, tumors are considered resectable at presentation. In contrast to metastatic liver disease, there is no role for systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of HCC. Today only evidence is available for Sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibiting agent. The arsenal of non-surgical therapies can roughly be divided into local ablative, transarterial and systemic therapies. In well selected patients, local ablative therapy can offer favorable long term results. For patients with disease confined to the liver, but locally more advanced, transarterial treatment modalities are proposed. These therapies exploit the dual blood supply to the liver. HCC derives its blood supply almost entirely from the hepatic artery, while liver parenchyma derives \> 75% of its blood supply from the portal vein. Antitumoral agents, such as cytotoxic drugs or radionuclides, can be delivered in close proximity of the tumor. Examples of transarterial therapies are: transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), bland transarterial embolization (TAE), transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads (TACE-DEB) and transarterial radioembolization with Iodine-131 or Yttrium-90. TACE is currently the gold standard for treatment of patients with intermediate stage HCC, with a reported median survival of around 17 months. A novel development in the TACE treatment for HCC is the drug-eluting bead (DEB). Recently performed small clinical trials reported the efficacy of DEBs in the treatment of intermediate stage HCC, which is substantially higher compared to conventional TACE. Yttrium-90 radioembolization (90Y-RE) is a relatively recently developed technique which implements transarterial administration of minimally embolic microspheres loaded with Yttrium-90, a β-emitting isotope, delivering selective internal radiation to the tumor. In this study the investigators want to prospectively compare TACE-DEB and 90Y-RE, two novel treatments that both have theoretical and/or proven advantages compared to the use of conventional TACE, in patients with intermediate stage HCC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 hepatocellular-carcinoma
Started Sep 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_2 hepatocellular-carcinoma
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2020
CompletedDecember 15, 2022
September 1, 2019
6.5 years
June 14, 2011
December 13, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to Progression (TTP).
Tumor progression is defined according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) response evaluation criteria. The mRECIST evaluation criteria define progressive disease by the implication of target lesions response, non-target lesions response and the occurrence of new lesions.
Patients will be followed over a 2 years period.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Time to Local Progression (TLP).
Since start of treatment untill local tumor progression with a maximum of 2 years follow up.
Survival of patients dedicated to either treatment arm.
Patients are followed for up to 2 years.
Quality of life EQ5D
Before treatment and after treatment on a 3 monthly interval during 2 years.
Tumor response to therapy according to mRECIST criteria
Before treatment and after treatment on a 3 monthly interval during 2 years.
Treatment-related costs.
After follow up of 2 year.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Yttrium-90 radioembolization (90Y-RE)
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransarterial chemoembolization is performed with drug eluting beads, polyvinyl alcohol-based microspheres (DC Beads, Biocompatibles) loaded with the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin.
Interventions
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is performed with drug eluting beads (DEB), polyvinyl alcohol-based microspheres loaded with the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin.
Glass Yttrium-90 microspheres (TheraSphere®; MDS Nordion Inc.) will be used
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent.
- The diagnosis HCC is confirmed by typical appearance on imaging or cytohistological evaluation (liver biopsy).
- Accurate staging:
- MRI of the liver CT-scan of the abdomen and thorax bone scintigraphy, only in case of clinical symptoms suggestive of skeletal metastases.
You may not qualify if:
- Hypersensitivity to doxorubicin
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Age under 18 years
- Child-Pugh score \>B7
- ECOG performance status (PST) \> 1
- Bilirubin \> 2.6 mg/dl
- AST/ALT \>5x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- \>50% of liver involvement
- Main portal vein (right, left or common trunk) thrombosis
- Extra-hepatic disease
- Previous treatment of study target lesions
- mTc-labelled macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) scintigraphy shows lack of MAA uptake in tumor (photopenic lesion)
- Activity \> 610 MBq and activity reduction would imply a liver target dose \> 80 Gy
- patients who are declared incompetent or suffering from physic disorders that make a comprehensive judgement impossible, such as psychosis.
- Unmanageable intolerance for contrast medium
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Ghent
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Related Publications (2)
Dhondt E, Lambert B, Hermie L, Huyck L, Vanlangenhove P, Geerts A, Verhelst X, Aerts M, Vanlander A, Berrevoet F, Troisi RI, Van Vlierberghe H, Defreyne L. 90Y Radioembolization versus Drug-eluting Bead Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results from the TRACE Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial. Radiology. 2022 Jun;303(3):699-710. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211806. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
PMID: 35258371DERIVEDSeinstra BA, Defreyne L, Lambert B, Lam MG, Verkooijen HM, van Erpecum KJ, van Hoek B, van Erkel AR, Coenraad MJ, Al Younis I, van Vlierberghe H, van den Bosch MA. Transarterial radioembolization versus chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (TRACE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012 Aug 23;13:144. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-144.
PMID: 22913492DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Luc Defreyne, MD, PhD
University Hospital, Ghent
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2011
First Posted
June 27, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
March 1, 2018
Study Completion
March 1, 2020
Last Updated
December 15, 2022
Record last verified: 2019-09