Continuous Chest Compressions vs AHA Standard CPR of 30:2
CCC
Trial Of Continuous Compressions Versus Standard CPR In Patients With Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
2 other identifiers
interventional
23,711
2 countries
7
Brief Summary
The primary aim of the trial is to compare survival to hospital discharge after continuous chest compressions (CCC) versus standard American Heart Association (AHA) recommended cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with interrupted chest compressions (ICC) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA). The primary null hypothesis will be that the rate of survival to hospital discharge is not affected by use of continuous compressions with passive or positive pressure ventilation (intervention group) versus CPR with compressions interrupted for ventilation at a ratio of 30:2 (control group).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jun 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_4
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 14, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 5, 2016
CompletedDecember 28, 2016
November 1, 2016
4.2 years
June 2, 2011
August 8, 2016
November 3, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Who Survive From the Time of Cardiac Arrest to Hospital Discharge
Patients may die in the field (outside of the hospital at the time of the cardiac arrest), at the emergency room, in the hospital, or they are discharged alive from the hospital.
Patients will be followed from the time of the cardiac arrest until death or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants Scoring at or Below a 3 on the MRS Scale
Patients will be followed from the time of the cardiac arrest until death or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.
Study Arms (2)
Standard CPR
ACTIVE COMPARATORAmerican Heart Association (AHA)recommended cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) of 30 compressions with brief pause for 2 ventilations
Continuous chest compressions
EXPERIMENTALContinuous compression CPR
Interventions
30:2 CPR consists of 3 cycles of standard CPR with each cycle consisting of 30 chest compressions with a pause for 2 ventilations at a compression:ventilation ratio of 30:2. CCC consists of a series of three cycles of continuous chest compressions without pauses for ventilation. In either group, each cycle will be followed by rhythm analysis until three cycles are completed or restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), whichever occurs first.
Continuous chest compressions during the first 6 minutes of the resuscitation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or more (or local age of consent);
- Initial fire/Emergency Medical Services (EMS) chest compressions provided by Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) study participating agency dispatched to the scene;
You may not qualify if:
- EMS witnessed arrest;
- Written do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) orders;
- Obvious primary asphyxia or respiratory cause of arrest (drowning, strangulation, hanging)
- Advanced airway placed prior to ROC EMS arrival, or pre-existing tracheostomy
- Traumatic cause (blunt, penetrating, burn) of arrest;
- Known prisoners;
- Known pregnancy;
- Uncontrolled bleeding or exsanguination
- Mechanical compression device used during study-assigned compression cycles
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Washingtonlead
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)collaborator
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)collaborator
- Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canadacollaborator
- American Heart Associationcollaborator
- Defence Research and Development Canadacollaborator
- U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Commandcollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Alabama Resuscitation Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
The Pittsburgh Resuscitation Network, University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261, United States
Dallas Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
Seattle-King County Center for Resuscitation Research
Seattle, Washington, 98195-6422, United States
Milwaukee Resuscitation Network, Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
University of Ottawa/University of British Columbia Collaborative RCC, Ottawa Health Research
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, Canada
Rescu
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Nichol G, Leroux B, Wang H, Callaway CW, Sopko G, Weisfeldt M, Stiell I, Morrison LJ, Aufderheide TP, Cheskes S, Christenson J, Kudenchuk P, Vaillancourt C, Rea TD, Idris AH, Colella R, Isaacs M, Straight R, Stephens S, Richardson J, Condle J, Schmicker RH, Egan D, May S, Ornato JP; ROC Investigators. Trial of Continuous or Interrupted Chest Compressions during CPR. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 3;373(23):2203-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509139. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
PMID: 26550795DERIVEDBrown SP, Wang H, Aufderheide TP, Vaillancourt C, Schmicker RH, Cheskes S, Straight R, Kudenchuk P, Morrison L, Colella MR, Condle J, Gamez G, Hostler D, Kayea T, Ragsdale S, Stephens S, Nichol G; ROC Investigators. A randomized trial of continuous versus interrupted chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: rationale for and design of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Continuous Chest Compressions Trial. Am Heart J. 2015 Mar;169(3):334-341.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.11.011. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
PMID: 25728722DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Susanne May
- Organization
- University of Washington, Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Myron Weisfeldt, MD, MD
Johns Hopkins University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2011
First Posted
June 14, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
November 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 28, 2016
Results First Posted
October 5, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-11