Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet x Open Microdiskectomy in Treatment of Lumbar Radiculopathy
PDOP_TLR
Comparison of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet x Open Microdiscectomy for Treatment of Lumbar Radiculopathy in Contained Disc Herniation: Randomized Clinical Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Approximately 300,000 patients undergo open surgical procedures to treat symptoms caused by disc herniation. Among the various surgical techniques practiced the percutaneous discectomy occupies its space since the first description of the technique by Hijikata, 1975. Throughout, many techniques have been described. Studies indicate that the treatment was successful for pain and disability resulting from herniated disc associated with radiculopathy small. However, some methods remove very small amounts of tissue with little change in volume of the disc. Thus, studies on the cadaver with Percutaneous Diskectomy by SpineJet ® showed more macroscopic changes of the disc with a predictable amount of removal and significant disc material. The Percutaneous Diskectomy by SpineJet ® is a new technique of percutaneous diskectomy which creates a suction effect in tissues adjacent to the exit point of the fluid and the opening point of the collector. However, no studies have examined the effect of the Percutaneous Diskectomy by SpineJet ® in humans about the disk size after treatment or measures of disc degeneration by imaging methods or how these characteristics might correlate with clinical outcomes. Thus, the study will compare outcomes of patients with contained or extruded disc herniation, with complaints of radiculopathy, concordant with the imaging findings. With treatment by surgical technique or the traditional by SpineJet ®, in order to determine whether percutaneous discectomy with SpineJet ® will produce results comparable to open microdiskectomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 31, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 7, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 4, 2014
CompletedJune 4, 2014
May 1, 2014
10 months
May 31, 2011
April 1, 2013
May 19, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
VAS for Lumbar Pain in 3 Months
Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -\> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome.
VAS for Lumbar Pain at 3 Months
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 3th Month
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) -\> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome.
3th month
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Clinical Evaluation
6th month
VAS for Lumbar - 1st Week
1st week from surgery
VAS for Lumbar 1st Month
1st month from surgery
VAS for Lumbar Pain - 3rd Month
3rd month from surgery
VAS for Lumbar Pain - 6th Month
6th month from surgery
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
OMicro
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
SJet
EXPERIMENTALThis group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Interventions
The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- single disc herniation, posterolateral, at any lumbar level, with a size of up to 1 / 3 of the spinal canal sagittal diameter, with radicular pain correlated with findings at MRI
- Failure of nonoperative treatment with at least one anti-inflammatory medication and at least two weeks of physical therapy within a period of 6 months
- acceptance of completion of informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Force \<4 / 5 in a muscle group in the lower limb
- Herniated Disc extrusa large (\> 1 / 3 of the sagittal canal diameter) or sequestered herniation
- moderate to grade stenosis of the central canal, lateral recess or foramen
- Surgery in the previous level involved
- Herniated disc at another level in the affected side
- Loss of disc height significantly (\> 60%) compared with the adjacent higher level
- Infection at the insertion of the device
- Pregnancy
- Any illness or medications that contraindicate surgical treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the USP
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-010, Brazil
Related Publications (22)
Hijikata S, Yamagishi M, Nakayama T, Oomori K. Percutaneous nucleotomy: a new treatment method for lumbar disk herniation. J Toden Hosp 1976, 6:6-13
BACKGROUNDChoy DS, Hellinger J, Tassi GP, Hellinger S. Percutaneous laser disc decompression. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007 Feb;25(1):60. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.9999. No abstract available.
PMID: 17352640BACKGROUNDDavis GW, Onik G. Clinical experience with automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Jan;(238):98-103.
PMID: 2521319BACKGROUNDMochida J, Toh E, Nomura T, Nishimura K. The risks and benefits of percutaneous nucleotomy for lumbar disc herniation. A 10-year longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 May;83(4):501-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b4.11508.
PMID: 11380118BACKGROUNDChoy DS. Percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD): 352 cases with an 8 1/2-year follow-up. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1995 Feb;13(1):17-21. doi: 10.1089/clm.1995.13.17.
PMID: 10150569BACKGROUNDWang JC, Shapiro MS, Hatch JD, Knight J, Dorey FJ, Delamarter RB. The outcome of lumbar discectomy in elite athletes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Mar 15;24(6):570-3. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199903150-00014.
PMID: 10101821BACKGROUNDPauza KJ, Howell S, Dreyfuss P, Peloza JH, Dawson K, Bogduk N. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intradiscal electrothermal therapy for the treatment of discogenic low back pain. Spine J. 2004 Jan-Feb;4(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.07.001.
PMID: 14749191BACKGROUNDCasey KF, Chang MK, O'Brien ED, Yuan HA, McCullen GM, Schaffer J, Kambin P. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy: comparison of preoperative and postoperative imaging studies. Arthroscopy. 1997 Aug;13(4):438-45. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(97)90121-3.
PMID: 9276049BACKGROUNDDelamarter RB, Howard MW, Goldstein T, Deutsch AL, Mink JH, Dawson EG. Percutaneous lumbar discectomy. Preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Apr;77(4):578-84. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199504000-00011.
PMID: 7713975BACKGROUNDTonami H, Yokota H, Nakagawa T, Higashi K, Okimura T, Yamamoto I, Nishijima Y. Percutaneous laser discectomy: MR findings within the first 24 hours after treatment and their relationship to clinical outcome. Clin Radiol. 1997 Dec;52(12):938-44. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80228-0.
PMID: 9413969BACKGROUNDKrugluger J, Knahr K. Chemonucleolysis and automated percutaneous discectomy--a prospective randomized comparison. Int Orthop. 2000;24(3):167-9. doi: 10.1007/s002640000139.
PMID: 10990391BACKGROUNDVigatto R, Alexandre NM, Correa Filho HR. Development of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 15;32(4):481-6. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000255075.11496.47.
PMID: 17304141BACKGROUNDDullerud R, Nakstad PH. Side effects and complications of automated percutaneous lumbar nucleotomy. Neuroradiology. 1997 Apr;39(4):282-5. doi: 10.1007/s002340050410.
PMID: 9144678BACKGROUNDWittenberg RH, Oppel S, Rubenthaler FA, Steffen R. Five-year results from chemonucleolysis with chymopapain or collagenase: a prospective randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Sep 1;26(17):1835-41. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00002.
PMID: 11568690BACKGROUNDSlotman GJ, Stein SC. Laminectomy compared with laparoscopic diskectomy and outpatient laparoscopic diskectomy for herniated L5-S1 intervertebral disks. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1998 Oct;8(5):261-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.1998.8.261.
PMID: 9820717RESULTAmoretti N, Huchot F, Flory P, Brunner P, Chevallier P, Bruneton JN. Percutaneous nucleotomy: preliminary communication on a decompression probe (Dekompressor) in percutaneous discectomy. Ten case reports. Clin Imaging. 2005 Mar-Apr;29(2):98-101. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2004.10.024.
PMID: 15752964RESULTMatsui H, Aoki M, Kanamori M. Lateral disc herniation following percutaneous lumbar discectomy. A case report. Int Orthop. 1997;21(3):169-71. doi: 10.1007/s002640050143.
PMID: 9266296RESULTMayer HM, Brock M. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discectomy. J Neurosurg. 1993 Feb;78(2):216-25. doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.78.2.0216.
PMID: 8267686RESULTTeng GJ, Jeffery RF, Guo JH, He SC, Zhu HZ, Wang XH, Wu YZ, Lu JM, Ling XL, Qian Y, Zhang YM, Zhu MJ, Guan L, He XM. Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy: a prospective multi-institutional study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997 May-Jun;8(3):457-63. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(97)70589-x.
PMID: 9152922RESULTBernhardt M, Gurganious LR, Bloom DL, White AA 3rd. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of percutaneous discectomy. A preliminary report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Feb;18(2):211-7.
PMID: 8441936RESULTCristante AF, Rocha ID, MartusMarcon R, Filho TE. Randomized clinical trial comparing lumbar percutaneous hydrodiscectomy with lumbar open microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc protrusions and herniations. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2016 May;71(5):276-80. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2016(05)06.
PMID: 27276397DERIVEDRocha ID, Cristante AF, Marcon RM, Oliveira RP, Letaif OB, Barros Filho TE. Controlled medial branch anesthetic block in the diagnosis of chronic lumbar facet joint pain: the value of a three-month follow-up. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014 Aug;69(8):529-34. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(08)05.
PMID: 25141111DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Alexandre Cristante Fogaça
- Organization
- IOT/HC University of SãoPaulo
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 31, 2011
First Posted
June 7, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
April 1, 2012
Study Completion
January 1, 2013
Last Updated
June 4, 2014
Results First Posted
June 4, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05