Study of the Tolerability of Ketorolac Tromethamine Following Intranasal Administration in Healthy Volunteers
A Phase 1, Double-Blind, Study of the Tolerability of Formulations of Ketorolac Tromethamine Following Intranasal Administration in Healthy Volunteers
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This was a Phase 1, double blind, two part study in healthy male and female volunteers. Each subject participated in only one part of the study. In Part A subjects received one dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine with a lidocaine hydrochloride free formulation in one nostril and one dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine containing 6% lidocaine hydrochloride in the other nostril, in a randomized manner. In Part B subjects were randomized to receive a single intranasal dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine containing 0% lidocaine hydrochloride into one nostril and either placebo or a single intranasal dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine containing 0%, 4% or 6% lidocaine hydrochloride into the other nostril. During the study, subjects remained resident from the morning of Day 1 until the afternoon of Day 1, when a post-study medical was performed prior to discharge. The objective of this study was to compare the tolerability of formulations of ketorolac tromethamine with differing concentrations of lidocaine hydrochloride (0% and 6% in Part A and 0%, 4%, 6% and placebo in Part B) following intranasal administration to healthy volunteers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1 healthy-volunteers
Started Dec 2006
Typical duration for phase_1 healthy-volunteers
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 27, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 1, 2011
CompletedMarch 6, 2018
March 1, 2018
2 months
May 27, 2011
March 2, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Discomfort Measurement on a Visual Analogue Scale
Following administration of each treatment, subjects completed a visual analogue scale (VAS) (ranging from "no discomfort" to "severe discomfort") at 1, 5, 10 and 15 minutes post-dose. If after the 15 minute VAS assessment discomfort was still present the subject was asked to complete further VAS assessments, at 5 minute intervals, until the discomfort had dissipated.
15 minutes post-dose
Study Arms (2)
Ketorolac tromethamine (Part A)
EXPERIMENTALKetorolac tromethamine (Part B)
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
One dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine with a lidocaine hydrochloride free formulation in one nostril and one dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine containing 6% lidocaine hydrochloride in the other nostril
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female volunteers, aged 18 to 60 years inclusive
- Female subjects of child bearing potential must have had a negative urine pregnancy test prior to entry into the study and must not have been breast feeding
- All female subjects of child bearing potential and all male subjects with female partners of child bearing potential must have consented to use a medically acceptable method of contraception (oral or implanted contraceptive hormones, condom or diaphragm with spermicidal agent, intrauterine device or surgical sterilization) throughout the study period
- Subject had given signed informed consent
- Subject was within 20% of normal weight for his/her height and body build according to the table of "Desirable Weights for Men and Women" (Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 1999)
- Subject's medical history was considered normal, with no clinically significant abnormalities
- Subject was considered to be in good health in the opinion of the Investigator, as determined by a pre-study physical examination with no clinically significant abnormalities, vital signs within normal ranges and an electrocardiogram (ECG) with no clinically significant abnormalities
- Subject's pre-study clinical laboratory findings were within the normal range or if outside of the normal range were not deemed clinically significant in the opinion of the Investigator
- Subject had bilateral patent nasal airways at screening and Day 1 as assessed by the Investigator
- Body weight of at least 60 kg
You may not qualify if:
- Subject had had a clinically significant illness in the four weeks before screening
- Use of prescribed medications in the three weeks prior to dosing or over-the-counter preparations for seven days prior to dosing, except paracetamol which was allowed up to 48 hours prior to dosing. However, use of multivitamins and oral contraceptives were permitted
- Subject had a significant history of drug/solvent abuse, or a positive drugs of abuse test at screening
- Subject had a history of alcohol abuse or currently drank in excess of 28 units per week (males) or 21 units per week (females)
- Current tobacco use or a history of smoking within the past five years
- Subject was in the opinion of the Investigator not suitable to participate in the study
- Subject had participated in any clinical study with an investigational drug/device within three months prior to dosing
- Subject had a positive result of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screen, Hepatitis B screen or Hepatitis C screen
- Subject had had a serious adverse reaction or significant hypersensitivity to any drug
- Subject had donated 500 mL or more of blood within the three months prior to screening
- Any history of co-existing nasal polyps, NSAID sensitivity and asthma
- Allergic reaction to aspirin or other NSAIDs
- Current upper respiratory tract infection or other respiratory tract condition that could have interfered with the absorption of the nasal spray or with the assessment of adverse events (AEs)
- Any suspicion of rhinitis medicamentosa (chronic daily use of topical decongestants)
- Use of a monoamine oxidase inhibitor in the 14 days prior to study entry
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Egalet Ltdlead
Study Sites (1)
ICON Developmental Solutions
Manchester, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cyril Clarke, BSc, MB BS, MFPM
ICON Developmental Solutions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 27, 2011
First Posted
June 1, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2006
Primary Completion
February 1, 2007
Study Completion
June 1, 2007
Last Updated
March 6, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03