Advance Care Planning Evaluation in Hospitalized Elderly Patients
ACCEPT
1 other identifier
observational
503
1 country
9
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to inform decision-makers of the best strategies to implement advanced care planning (ACP). An advanced care plan (ACP) is a verbal or written instruction describing what kind of care an individual would want (or not want)if they are no longer able speak for themselves to make health care decisions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2011
Typical duration for all trials
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 30, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2015
CompletedDecember 16, 2020
February 1, 2015
3.5 years
May 20, 2011
December 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Extent of Implementation of ACP
a. Does the patient have an advance directive or living will or some other written document expressing their wishes? b.patient and/or family been informed of the patients' prognosis? c.Has the patient and/or family been informed about the expected benefits and burdens of various treatment options? d.Has the patient considered how s/he wants to live in the final stages of life and what kinds of medical treatments they would want or not want? e.Have they discussed this with their family? A health care provider? g.Has there been a discussion about their goals of care with their health care provider? If so, are they aware of them? h.Has there been a decision made about medical treatments at the end of life? If so, what role did the patient/family play in that decision-making and was this consistent with their preferred role? i.Is there documentation in the medical record of the overall goals of care?
Year 3
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Effect of an audit and feedback process plus tailored interventions ACP
Year 3
Impact of ACP on patient/family satisfaction
Year 3
ACP components associated with overall satisfaction
Year 3
Comparison of sites with low vs high system level implementation of ACP on satisfaction
Year 3
Eligibility Criteria
We will enroll patients who are at high risk of dying and/or their families (where available).
You may qualify if:
- years or older with one or more of the following diagnoses:
- Chronic obstructive lung disease - 2 of the 4 of: baseline PaCO2 of \> 45 torr, cor pulmonale; respiratory failure episode within the preceding year; forced expiratory volume in 1 sec \<0.5 L.
- Congestive heart failure - New York Heart Association class IV symptoms and left ventricular ejection fraction \< 25%.
- Cirrhosis - confirmed by imaging studies or documentation of esophageal varices and one of three conditions: a) hepatic coma, b) Child's class C liver disease, or c) Child's class B liver disease with gastrointestinal bleeding.
- Cancer - metastatic cancer or stage IV lymphoma.
- End-stage dementia (inability to perform all ADLs, mutism or minimal verbal output secondary to dementia, bed-bound state prior to acute illness) OR
- Any patient 80 years of age or older admitted to hospital from the community because of an acute medical or surgical condition.
You may not qualify if:
- Non-English speaking patient/family member
- Patient with cognitive impairment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Daren K. Heylandlead
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)collaborator
Study Sites (9)
Peter Lougheed Hospital
Calgary, Alberta, T1Y 6J4, Canada
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Royal Alexandra Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, T5H 3V9, Canada
Royal Columbian Hospital
New Westminster, British Columbia, V3L 3W4, Canada
Vancouver Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1C6, Canada
St Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
St.Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
Hamilton General Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Heyland DK, Heyland R, Dodek P, You JJ, Sinuff T, Hiebert T, Jiang X, Day AG; ACCEPT Study Team and the Canadian Researchers at the End of Life Network (CARENET). Discordance between patients' stated values and treatment preferences for end-of-life care: results of a multicentre survey. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Sep;7(3):292-299. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-001056. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
PMID: 28827369DERIVEDHeyland DK, Dodek P, You JJ, Sinuff T, Hiebert T, Tayler C, Jiang X, Simon J, Downar J; ACCEPT Study Team and the Canadian Researchers at the End of Life Network (CARENET). Validation of quality indicators for end-of-life communication: results of a multicentre survey. CMAJ. 2017 Jul 31;189(30):E980-E989. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160515.
PMID: 28760834DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daren K Heyland, MD, MSc
Queen's University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Clinical Evaluation Reserach Unit
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2011
First Posted
May 30, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 16, 2020
Record last verified: 2015-02