NCT01360632

Brief Summary

To compare the effect of OPC-34712 (brexpiprazole) to the effect of placebo (an inactive substance) as add on treatment to an assigned FDA approved antidepressant treatment (ADT) in patients with Major Depressive Disorder who demonstrate an incomplete response to a prospective trial of the same assigned FDA approved ADT

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,539

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2011

Geographic Reach
7 countries

71 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 24, 2011

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 25, 2011

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2011

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2013

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

January 1, 2016

Status Verified

November 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

May 24, 2011

Results QC Date

August 11, 2015

Last Update Submit

November 30, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

OPC-34712brexpiprazoleMajor Depressive DisorderAdjunctive Treatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Mean Change From the End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale for the Efficacy Sample Set

    The MADRS was utilized as the primary efficacy assessment of a participant's level of depression. The MADRS consisted of 10 items, all rated on a 0 to 6 scale with 0 being the "best" rating and 6 being the "worst" rating. The MADRS total score were to be unevaluable if less than 8 of the 10 items were recorded. If 8 or 9 of the 10 items were recorded, the MADRS total score was the mean of the recorded items multiplied by 10 and then rounded of to the first decimal place. The MADRS Total Score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items. The possible total scores are from 0 to 60, with higher values indicating worse outcome.

    Baseline and Week 14

  • Mean Change in MADRS Total Score From Baseline End of Week 8 to Week 14 for the Efficacy Sample Per Final Protocol

    The MADRS was utilized as the primary efficacy assessment of a participant's level of depression. The MADRS consisted of 10 items, all rated on a 0 to 6 scale with 0 being the "best" rating and 6 being the "worst" rating. The MADRS total score were to be unevaluable if less than 8 of the 10 items were recorded. If 8 or 9 of the 10 items were recorded, the MADRS total score was the mean of the recorded items multiplied by 10 and then rounded of to the first decimal place. The MADRS Total Score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items. The possible total scores are from 0 to 60, with higher values indicating worse outcome.

    Baseline and Week 14

Secondary Outcomes (22)

  • Mean Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) in MADRS Total Score for Every Study Week Visit in Phase B Other Than Week 14 Visit for the Efficacy Sample Set

    Week 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13

  • Mean Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) in MADRS Total Score for Every Study Week Visit in Phase B Other Than Week 14 Visit for the Efficacy Sample Per Final Protocol

    Week 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13

  • Mean Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to End of Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Mean Scores for the Efficacy Sample Set

    Week 11 and Week 14

  • Mean Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to End of Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in SDS Mean Scores for the Efficacy Sample Per Final Protocol

    Week 11 and Week 14

  • Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) in SDS Item Scores for the Efficacy Sample Set

    Week 11 and Week 14

  • +17 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Phase B

EXPERIMENTAL

Drug: OPC-34712 + ADT Drug: Placebo + ADT

Drug: OPC-34712 + ADTDrug: Placebo + ADT

Phase A

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Drug: Placebo + ADT

Drug: Placebo + ADT

Interventions

Tablets, Oral, 1 or 3 mg OPC-34712 and FDA Approved Antidepressant Therapy (ADT)

Phase B

Placebo + FDA Approved Antidepressant (ADT)

Phase B

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female subjects between 18 and 65 years of age, with diagnosis of major depressive disorder, as defined by DSM-IV-TR criteria
  • The current depressive episode must be equal to or greater than 8 weeks in duration
  • Subjects must report a history for the current depressive episode of an inadequate response to no more than three adequate antidepressant treatments

You may not qualify if:

  • Females who are breast-feeding and/or who have a positive pregnancy test result prior to receiving study drug
  • Subjects who report an inadequate response to more than three adequate trials of antidepressant treatments during current depressive episode at a therapeutic dose for an adequate duration
  • Subjects with a current Axis I (DSM-IV-TR) diagnosis of: Delirium, dementia, amnestic or other cognitive disorder, Schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or other psychotic disorder, Bipolar I or II disorder
  • Subjects with a clinically significant current Axis II (DSM-IV-TR) diagnosis of borderline, antisocial, paranoid, schizoid, schizotypal or histrionic personality disorder

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (71)

Research Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Location

Research Site

Costa Mesa, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Glendale, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Orange, California, United States

Location

Research Site

San Diego, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Temecula, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

Jacksonville Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

Miami Springs, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Location

Research Site

Smyrna, Georgia, United States

Location

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

Research Site

Oak Brook, Illinois, United States

Location

Research Site

Lafayette, Indiana, United States

Location

Research Site

Owensboro, Kentucky, United States

Location

Research Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Location

Research Site

Haverhill, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Research Site

Weymouth, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Research Site

Rochester Hills, Michigan, United States

Location

Research Site

Creve Coeur, Missouri, United States

Location

Research Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Location

Research Site

Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States

Location

Research Site

Toms River, New Jersey, United States

Location

Research Site

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Location

Research Site

Fresh Meadows, New York, United States

Location

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Location

Research Site

Staten Island, New York, United States

Location

Research Site

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Location

Research Site

Beachwood, Ohio, United States

Location

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Location

Research Site

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Location

Research Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Research Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salem, Oregon, United States

Location

Research Site

Norristown, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Research Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Research Site

Lincoln, Rhode Island, United States

Location

Research Site

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Location

Research Site

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Location

Research Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Location

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Location

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Research Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Research Site

Witchita Falls, Texas, United States

Location

Research Site

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Location

Research Site

Herndon, Virginia, United States

Location

Research Site

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Location

Research Site

Spokane, Washington, United States

Location

Research Site

Brown Deer, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Research Site

Middleton, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Research Site

Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada

Location

Research Site

Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany

Location

Research Site

Stralsund, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany

Location

Research Site

Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Location

Research Site

Achim, Germany

Location

Research Site

Nyíregyháza, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Budapest, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Győr, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Bucharest, Romania

Location

Research Site

Lasi, Romania

Location

Research Site

Târgu Mureş, Romania

Location

Research Site

Moscow, Russia

Location

Research Site

Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Location

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Research Site

Chenigiv, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Kharkiv, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Kiev, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Poltava, Ukraine

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Kapadia S, Zhang Z, Ardic F, Patel M, Thase ME, Papakostas GI. Adjunctive brexpiprazole in patients with major depressive disorder who show minimal or partial response to antidepressant treatment: post hoc analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2025 Oct 1;28(10):pyaf074. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaf074.

  • Ardic F, Zhang Z, Hogan M. Effects of adjunctive brexpiprazole in patients with major depressive disorder and sleep disturbance: a post hoc analysis of three randomized trials. Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 7;16:1618176. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1618176. eCollection 2025.

  • Kapadia S, Zhang Z, Csoboth C, Patel M, Thase ME, Papakostas GI. Adjunctive brexpiprazole in patients with unresolved symptoms of depression on antidepressant treatment who are early in the disease course: post hoc analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2025 Aug 1;28(8):pyaf050. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaf050.

  • McIntyre RS, Bubolic S, Zhang Z, MacKenzie EM, Therrien F, Miguelez M, Boucher M. Effects of Adjunctive Brexpiprazole on Individual Depressive Symptoms and Functioning in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Anxious Distress: Post Hoc Analysis of Three Placebo-Controlled Studies. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024 Mar-Apr 01;44(2):133-140. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001825.

  • Newcomer JW, Meehan SR, Chen D, Brubaker M, Weiss C. Changes in Metabolic Parameters and Body Weight in Patients With Prediabetes Treated With Adjunctive Brexpiprazole for Major Depressive Disorder: Pooled Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Clinical Studies. J Clin Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 28;84(5):23m14786. doi: 10.4088/JCP.23m14786.

  • McIntyre RS, Therrien F, Ismail Z, Meehan SR, Miguelez M, Larsen KG, Chen D, MacKenzie EM, Thase ME. Effects of adjunctive brexpiprazole on patient life engagement in major depressive disorder: Post hoc analysis of Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report data. J Psychiatr Res. 2023 Jun;162:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.04.012. Epub 2023 Apr 12.

  • Newcomer JW, Eriksson H, Zhang P, Meehan SR, Weiss C. Changes in Metabolic Parameters and Body Weight in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Treated With Adjunctive Brexpiprazole: Pooled Analysis of Phase 3 Clinical Studies. J Clin Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 1;80(6):18m12680. doi: 10.4088/JCP.18m12680.

  • Hobart M, Zhang P, Weiss C, Meehan SR, Eriksson H. Adjunctive Brexpiprazole and Functioning in Major Depressive Disorder: A Pooled Analysis of Six Randomized Studies Using the Sheehan Disability Scale. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Mar 1;22(3):173-179. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy095.

  • McIntyre RS, Weiller E, Zhang P, Weiss C. Brexpiprazole as adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder with anxious distress: Results from a post-hoc analysis of two randomised controlled trials. J Affect Disord. 2016 Sep 1;201:116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 May 12.

  • Thase ME, Youakim JM, Skuban A, Hobart M, Zhang P, McQuade RD, Nyilas M, Carson WH, Sanchez R, Eriksson H. Adjunctive brexpiprazole 1 and 3 mg for patients with major depressive disorder following inadequate response to antidepressants: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;76(9):1232-40. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09689.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive DisorderDepressionDepressive Disorder, MajorMood DisordersMental Disorders

Interventions

Androgen Antagonists

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hormone AntagonistsHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsPhysiological Effects of DrugsPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and Uses

Results Point of Contact

Title
Global Medical Affairs
Organization
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization, Inc.

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2011

First Posted

May 25, 2011

Study Start

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion

August 1, 2013

Study Completion

September 1, 2013

Last Updated

January 1, 2016

Results First Posted

January 1, 2016

Record last verified: 2015-11

Locations