TASALL - TachoSil® Against Liquor Leak
TachoSil® Versus Current Practice in Dura Sealing Techniques for the Prevention of Post-operative Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Leaks in Patients Undergoing Skull Base Surgery: An Open Label, Randomised, Controlled, Multi-centre, Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
726
11 countries
39
Brief Summary
The primary objective is to demonstrate superiority of TachoSil® compared to current practice as an adjunct in sealing the dura mater. The efficacy of the dura mater sealing must be evaluated post-operatively. The secondary objective is to evaluate the safety of TachoSil® as an adjunct in sealing the dura mater. The trial population will consist of 726 randomised (1:1) patients elected for skull base surgery. The trial duration consists of screening, surgery, efficacy follow-up after 7±1 weeks and safety follow-up 28±2 weeks after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Apr 2011
39 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 11, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 18, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 25, 2014
CompletedJuly 25, 2014
June 1, 2014
2.2 years
May 11, 2011
June 26, 2014
June 26, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Evident Verified Post-Operative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak or Clinically Evident Pseudomeningocele or Treatment Failure
An assessment was performed daily from randomization to Day of Discharge and at the Efficacy Follow-up visit at week 7 ± 1 week. Clinically evident cerebrospinal fluid leak was confirmed by: 1. Glucose concentration test and/or 2. β-2-transferrin test. A clinically evident pseudomeningocele was considered to be present post-operatively if the following criteria were fulfilled: 1. A subcutaneous, visible/palpable fluctuant fluid accumulation was noted at the site of the surgical incision or adjacent to it; 2. It is suspected the fluid accumulation is cerebrospinal fluid. A treatment failure was defined as application of a new and/or different treatment after application of the study treatment or a third application of (or part of) the selected study treatment on the outside of the dura.
Up to 8 Weeks (7 Weeks ± 1 Week)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants With Post-Surgical Non-Clinically Evident Post-Operative Pseudomeningocele
Assessment at least once prior to discharge from neurosurgical ward, with the expected discharge from neurosurgical ward after an average of 10 days (Up to 28 Weeks)
Study Arms (2)
TachoSil®
EXPERIMENTALCurrent practice group
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Primary suture must be performed. Duraplasty may be performed at the discretion of the investigator. TachoSil® must be applied under aseptic conditions during the closure of the dura.
Primary suture must be performed. Duraplasty may be performed at the discretion of the investigator. In addition to primary suture, whatever means of dura closure deemed necessary by the investigator may be used with the exception of TachoSil®.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Is the surgical approach/procedure consistent with skull base surgery? I.e. one of the following:
- Lateral approach to the foramen magnum: Far lateral, extreme lateral, anterolateral, posterolateral
- Approach to the jugular foramen: Infratemporal, juxta condylar, transjugular
- Approach to the cerebello pontine (CP) angle and petrous apex retrosigmoid
- Approach to the middle fossa: Subtemporal (+/- petrous apex drilling), pterional approach (any fronto temporal approach +/- orbitozygomatic deposition)
- Approach to the anterior fossa: Subfrontal (uni or bilateral)
- Approach to the midline posterior fossa
You may not qualify if:
- Has the patient been subject to neurosurgery involving opening of the dura mater within the last 3 months?
- Is the patient anticipated to undergo any additional neurosurgery involving opening of the dura mater which may affect the efficacy evaluation (e.g. re-operation or anticipation to undergo several neurosurgeries) before the Efficacy Follow-up Week 7±1 week?
- Is the patient anticipated to undergo any additional neurosurgery involving opening of the dura mater which may affect the safety evaluation (e.g. re-operation or anticipation to undergo several neurosurgeries) before the Safety Follow-up Week 28±2 weeks?
- The surgical approach/procedure is consistent with any transcranial or transfacial or combination of transcranial - transfacial approaches with wide defect in the skull base? I.e. any of the following:
- Trans basal approach
- Total petrosectomy
- Trans facial approach
- Trans sphenoidal approach
- Endoscopic procedures
- Trans oral approach (and any extension: Le Fort, mandibulotomy)
- The surgical approach is consistent with one of the following approaches?
- Translabyrinthine approach
- Retrolabyrinthine approach
- Transcochlear (limited transpetrosal) approach
- Did the arachnoid membrane and the CSF containing system remain intact during surgery?
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (39)
Nycomed Investigational Site
Graz, 8036, Austria
Nycomed Investigational Site
Brussels, 1070, Belgium
Nycomed Investigational Site
Genk, 3600, Belgium
Nycomed Investigational Site
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
Nycomed Investigational Site
Liège, 4000, Belgium
Nycomed Investigational Site
Grenoble, 38043, France
Nycomed Investigational Site
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270, France
Nycomed Investigational Site
Marseille, 13005, France
Nycomed Investigational Site
Nice, 6002, France
Nycomed Investigational Site
Paris, 75010, France
Nycomed Investigational Site
Strasbourg, 67000, France
Nycomed Investigational Site
Toulouse, 31059, France
Nycomed Investigational Site
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106, Germany
Nycomed Investigational Site
Halle, 6112, Germany
Nycomed Investigational Site
Homburg, 66421, Germany
Nycomed Investigational Site
München, 81925, Germany
Nycomed Investigational Site
Rostock, 18057, Germany
Nycomed Investigational Site
Athens, 10676, Greece
Nycomed Investigational Site
Athens, 15123, Greece
Nycomed Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 54636, Greece
Nycomed Investigational Site
Genova, 16128, Italy
Nycomed Investigational Site
Lecce, 73100, Italy
Nycomed Investigational Site
Palermo, 90127, Italy
Nycomed Investigational Site
Siena, 53100, Italy
Nycomed Investigational Site
Dammers, 3015 CE, Netherlands
Nycomed Investigational Site
Gdansk, 80-803, Poland
Nycomed Investigational Site
Gdansk, 80-952, Poland
Nycomed Investigational Site
Warsaw, 02-781, Poland
Nycomed Investigational Site
Moscow, 125047, Russia
Nycomed Investigational Site
Barcelona, 8035, Spain
Nycomed Investigational Site
Barcelona, 8036, Spain
Nycomed Investigational Site
El Palmar, 30120, Spain
Nycomed Investigational Site
Madrid, 28049, Spain
Nycomed Investigational Site
Majadahonda, 28222, Spain
Nycomed Investigational Site
Málaga, 29010, Spain
Nycomed Investigational Site
Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
Nycomed Investigational Site
Gothenburg, 41345, Sweden
Nycomed Investigational Site
Lund, 22185, Sweden
Nycomed Investigational Site
Stockholm, 17176, Sweden
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director, Clinical Science
- Organization
- Takeda
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Nycomed
Clinical Trial Operations
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 11, 2011
First Posted
May 18, 2011
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2013
Study Completion
June 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 25, 2014
Results First Posted
July 25, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-06