TachoSil® Versus Surgicel® Original for the Secondary Treatment of Local Bleeding in Adult and Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection Surgery
A Randomized, Open Label, Parallel-group, Multi-center Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of TachoSil® Versus Surgicel® Original for the Secondary Treatment of Local Bleeding in Adult and Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection Surgery
2 other identifiers
interventional
253
1 country
17
Brief Summary
The efficacy and safety of TachoSil® as secondary hemostatic treatment in hepatic resection surgery will be compared to the standard USA licensed hemostatic agent, Surgicel® Original. Hemostatic efficacy will be evaluated intraoperatively after application of randomized treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Aug 2010
Typical duration for phase_3
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 31, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 25, 2015
CompletedNovember 25, 2015
October 1, 2015
2.8 years
August 27, 2010
August 13, 2015
October 22, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants With Intraoperative Hemostasis at Target Bleeding Site Within 3 Minutes
3 Minutes after the patch was applied to the target bleeding area, the area was observed to see if the bleeding stopped.
within 3 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Participants With Intraoperative Hemostasis at Target Bleeding Site Within 5 Minutes
within 5 minutes
Time to Intraoperative Hemostasis at Target Bleeding Site
10 minutes
Study Arms (2)
TachoSil®
ACTIVE COMPARATORTachoSil® absorbable patches, applied topically, once, intraoperatively to stop bleeding. The number of patches used was determined by the surgeon based on the size of the wound. If bleeding did not stop after 5 minutes treatment was repeated.
Surgicel® Original
ACTIVE COMPARATORSurgicel® Original absorbable patches, applied topically, once, intraoperatively to stop bleeding. The number of patches used was determined by the surgeon based on the size of the wound. If bleeding did not stop after 5 minutes treatment was repeated.
Interventions
Intraoperative application as secondary hemostatic treatment
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Resection of at least the equivalent tissue volume of 1 anatomical segment of the liver
- Minor to moderate (oozing/diffuse) bleeding from the resection area persisting after conventional resection procedure and primary control of arterial pulsating bleeding or major venous hemorrhage by sutures, ligations, clips, vascular stapler, point electrocautery or focal radiofrequency ablation
- Need for additional supportive hemostatic treatment
- Expected ability to lightly press the trial treatment to the liver resection wound for 3 minutes
You may not qualify if:
- Indication for emergency surgery
- Known coagulopathy (as judged relevant by the investigator)
- Known or suspected hypersensitivity to any ingredient of the investigational medicinal products (e.g. human fibrinogen, human thrombin and/or collagen of any origin)
- Patient unwilling to receive blood products
- Known current alcohol or drug abuse
- Pregnancy, breastfeeding, no use of acceptable contraceptive method in females of childbearing potential
- Dry surgical field of the targeted application area
- Occurrence of any serious surgical complication
- Disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC), i.e. microvascular bleeding
- Application of topical hemostatic material on the liver resection wound
- Radiofrequency precoagulation of the liver resection wound except focal radiofrequency ablation of vessels as primary hemostatic treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (17)
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Burlington, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Newark, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Related Publications (1)
Genyk Y, Kato T, Pomposelli JJ, Wright JK Jr, Sher LS, Tetens V, Chapman WC. Fibrin Sealant Patch (TachoSil) vs Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Patch (Surgicel Original) for the Secondary Treatment of Local Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Mar;222(3):261-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.007. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
PMID: 26776356DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director, Clinical Science
- Organization
- Takeda
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2010
First Posted
August 31, 2010
Study Start
August 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 25, 2015
Results First Posted
November 25, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10