Glottic Visualization & Ease of Intubation With Different Laryngoscope Blades
Comparison of Visualisation of Laryngeal Inlet and Ease of Intubation With Different Laryngoscope Blades.
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Orotracheal intubation the commonest method used to secure and maintain airway during anaesthesia. A variety of methods are available for orotracheal intubation such as digital or tactile method, use of lighted orotracheal intubating stylet, use of intubating LMA (which is becoming increasing popular, particularly in cased of anticipated difficult intubation), fibreoptic endoscopic orotracheal intubation (also used when a difficulty is predicted), and conventional and most common method, direct laryngoscopy. Orotracheal intubation is most commonly achieved after visualization of laryngeal inlet with direct laryngoscopy following induction of general anaesthesia and muscle relaxation achieved by administration of a muscle relaxant. Due to the hazards seen with failed intubation, anaesthetists are also on the lookout for techniques which will improve visualization of the laryngeal inlet, i.e. glottis. View obtained during laryngoscopy can be classified in a variety of ways such as Cormack Lehane grading, the percentage of glottic opening (POGO Score)Literature suggests that straight blade gives better glottic visualization while tracheal intubation is easier with the curved blade. We therefore wanted to compare the Macintosh and Miller laryngoscope blades in terms of visualization of Laryngeal inlet and ease of intubation in patients with normal predicted intubation. We also compared the McCoy blade, a modified curved blade, and the Trueview Laryngoscope, which incorporates a prism in a straight blade, for glottic view and ease of intubation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2008
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2011
CompletedMay 11, 2011
May 1, 2011
2 months
May 9, 2011
May 10, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visualization of glottis and Ease of Intubation
Visualization of laryngeal inlet: Grade 1: complete glottis visible Grade 2: anterior glottis not seen Grade 3: epiglottis seen but not glottis Grade 4: epiglottis not seen Ease of intubation: Grade 1: Intubation easy Grade 2: Intubation requiring an increased anterior lifting force and assistance to pull the right corner of the mouth upwards to increase space Grade 3: Intubation requiring multiple attempts and a curved stylet Grade 4: Failure to intubate with the assigned laryngoscope
During Laryngoscopy and intubation average time 1 minute
Study Arms (4)
Macintosh
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaryngoscopy performed with Macintosh Laryngoscope
McCoy
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaryngoscopy performed with MacCoy Laryngoscope
Miller
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaryngoscopy performed with Miller Laryngoscope
TrueView
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaryngoscopy performed with TrueView Laryngoscope
Interventions
Laryngoscopy performed with Macintosh Laryngoscope
Laryngoscopy performed with MacCoy Laryngoscope
Laryngoscopy performed with Miller Laryngoscope
Laryngoscopy performed with TrueView laryngoscope
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients in the age group of 18-70 yrs
- Patients with ASA grade I and II
- Undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient's refusal for consent for study.
- Patients less than 18 years and more than 70years of age.
- Pregnant patients
- Patients with difficult mask ventilation and /or anticipated difficult intubation
- Patients with pathology in neck, upper respiratory tract and upper alimentary tract.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tata Memorial Hopsital
Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Atul P Kulkarni, MD Anaes
Professor Tata Memorial Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2011
First Posted
May 11, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2008
Primary Completion
October 1, 2008
Study Completion
October 1, 2008
Last Updated
May 11, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-05