Alfentanil Versus Remifentanil in Patient-controlled Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
Alfentanil vs Remifentanil in Patient-controlled Sedation During ERCP.A Randomized Double-blind Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
81
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Self-administration of propofol and opioid mixture by the patient him- or herself (patient-controlled sedation, PCS) could be successful alternative to the anesthesiologists-managed deep sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, it is not known which opioid would be the most suitable for PCS. The aim of this double-blind study was to compare remifentanil and alfentanil in PCS during ERCP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jun 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 9, 2011
CompletedJuly 6, 2012
July 1, 2012
3 months
May 5, 2011
July 4, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
consumption of propofol and opioid
one day
vital signs
Heart rate (HR), electrocardiogram (ECG), breathing rate, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), end tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) constant monitoring. Noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP)measuring at 5 min intervals.
one day
Secondary Outcomes (4)
sedation levels
one day
pain intensity
one day
patient´s and endoscopist´s satisfaction with sedation
one day
incidence of nausea
one day
Study Arms (3)
remifentanil
ACTIVE COMPARATORsedative mixture for PCS consisting of propofol 10mg/ml 20 ml and remifentanil 50 mkg/ml 5 ml
alfentanil 0.04 mg/ml
ACTIVE COMPARATORsedative mixture for PCS consisting of propofol10 mg/ml 20 ml,alfentanil 0.5 mg/ml 2 ml, NaCL 9 mg/ml 3 ml
alfentanil 0.08 mg/ml
ACTIVE COMPARATORsedative mixture for PCS consisting of propofol 10 mg/ml 20 ml, alfentanil 0.5 mg/ml 4 ml,NaCl 9mg/ml 1ml
Interventions
Alfentanil is a potent but short-acting synthetic opioid analgesic drug, used for anaesthesia in surgery. It is an analogue of fentanyl with around 1/10 the potency of fentanyl and around 1/3 of the duration of action, but with an onset of effects 4x faster than fentanyl.It is an OP3 mu-agonist.Alfentanil is administered by the parenteral (injected) route for fast onset of effects and precise control of dosage.
Remifentanil is a potent ultra short-acting synthetic opioid analgesic drug. It is given to patients during surgery to relieve pain and as an adjunct to an anaesthetic. Remifentanil is used for sedation as well as combined with other medications for use in general anesthesia. The use of remifentanil has made possible the use of high dose opioid and low dose hypnotic anesthesia, due to synergism between remifentanil and various hypnotic drugs and volatile anesthetics.It is administered in the form remifentanil hydrochloride and in adults is given as an intravenous infusion in doses ranging from 0.1 microgram per kilogram per minute to 0.5 (µg/kg)/min.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- elective ERCP patients
You may not qualify if:
- allergy to propofol or opioid analgesics, drug addiction, inability to co-operate, ASA class greater than 3, or patient's refusal.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Helsiki University Central Hospital,Meilahti Hospital,Endoscopy unit
Helsinki, Uusimaa, 00029, Finland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Reino Pöyhiä, MD,PhD
Helsinki University Central Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maxim Mazanikov, MD
Helsinki University Central Hospital,Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martti Färkkilä, MD,Professor
Helsinki University Central Hospital,Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leena Kylänpää, MD,PhD
Helsinki University Central Hospital,Department of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jorma Halttunen, MD,PhD
Helsinki University Central Hospital,Department of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Outi Lindström, MD,PhD
Helsinki University Central Hospital,Department of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Harri Mustonen, DSc
Helsinki University Central Hospital, Department of Surgery
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marianne Udd, MD,PhD
Helsinki University Central Hospital,Department of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2011
First Posted
May 9, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2009
Primary Completion
September 1, 2009
Study Completion
September 1, 2009
Last Updated
July 6, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-07