Hepatic Arterial Chemotherapy With Raltitrexed and Oxaliplatin Versus Standard Chemotherapy in Unresectable Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer After Conventional Chemotherapy Failure
HEARTO
Phase II Randomized Study Comparing the Association of Intraarterial Perfusion of Raltitrexed and Oxaliplatin Versus Standard Chemotherapy Using Intravenous Perfusion for Colorectal Cancer Patient With Metastases Localized to Liver After Failure of Conventional Treatments.
1 other identifier
interventional
31
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Standard treatment of metastatic colorectal cancers relies on fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan alone or in association with fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin in association with fluoropyrimidines, bevacizumab and anti EGFR antibodies. After failure of classical regimen the national reference frame on the basis of phase II study proposes an association of fluoropyrimidine and mitomycin. These treatments give response rates of 10-20% with progression free survivals from 2 to 3 months. Hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy is logical in the case of isolated hepatic metastases nonaccessible to curative resection: 1) hepatic metastases are vascularized by hepatic arterial system in contrast to nontumoral hepatic parenchyma; 2) arterial perfusion of oxaliplatin leads to a strong extraction by the liver during the first passage, a high intra-tumoral concentration and a low systemic concentration. So oxaliplatin is a drug of choice for arterial treatment but combination with fluoropyrimidines is impossible because of need for prolonged perfusion. Floxuridin is not available in France. Raltitrexed, a definitive inhibitor of the thymidylate synthase, does not require a prolonged perfusion and could be a good substitute.In a previous pilot study we demonstrated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of combination of raltitrexed and oxaliplatin arterial perfusion. Now we propose a phase II randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion of raltitrexed and oxaliplatin association versus standard chemotherapy for patients with metastases of colorectal origin restricted to the liver after failure of conventional chemotherapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 colorectal-cancer
Started Dec 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_2 colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 15, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 27, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 5, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 18, 2018
CompletedJuly 16, 2018
July 1, 2018
Same day
April 27, 2011
July 12, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
progression-free survival
for each patient after the 6 months of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Estimate the parameters of tumor perfusion using arterial CT Scan data
for each patient of experimental arm every 9 weeks after the six months of treatment or until progression
Estimate the rate of objective response according to the criteria of CHOI and RECIST
for each patient every 9 weeks during the 6 months of treatment or until progression
Estimate the overall survival which will be compared with the median of overall survival in other studies published in the literature
after all data completion after the end of all patient follow-up (december 2013-anticipated)
Estimate the rate of secondary resectable hepatic metastases
after all data completion after the end of all patient follow-up (december 2013-anticipated)
Estimate the tolerance of the treatment (NCI-CTCAE version 4.0)
For each patient every 21 days during the six months of treatment and for one year of follow up or until progression
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ARM A
EXPERIMENTALHepatic artery infusion through an implanted arterial catheter of the combination of raltitrexed (3 mg/m ²) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m ²) every 21 days.
ARM B
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntravenous standard chemotherapy.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Informed consent signature by the patient-
- Cover by an health insurance
- Age between 18 and 75 years
- Age between 76 et 80 years if patient WHO Status 0
- WHO status of 0 or 1
- Estimated Life expectancy \> 3 months
- Hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer confirmed on CT Scan without extra-hepatic metastasis (the presence of asymptomatic primary tumor is tolerated)
- TEP-Scan without fixation outside the liver and the primary tumor
- Histological proven colorectal cancer obtained from primary tumor or the hepatic metastases
- Metastases not accessible to curative hepatectomy (impossible R0 surgery or leaving less than 30 % of residual liver), or requiring a complex, very wide hepatectomy (5 segments or more) and\\or risky procedure (RPC Class II)- - Presence of hepatic lesion \> 10 mm on CTScan or hepatic MRI
- Failure or arrest of a previous chemotherapy because of intolerance to oxaliplatin, irinotecan, a fluoropyrimidine and/or target therapies (bevacizumab, cetuximab or panitumumab given for tumor expressing wild type Ki-Ras)
- Bilirubinemia\< 1,5 times the superior limit of the normal ( N ),
- ASAT and ALAT \< 5 N,
- Creatinemia \< 1.5 N and creatinine clearance \> 65ml/mn,
- Neutrophils \> 1,5 x 109/L, platelets 100 x 109/L, hemoglobin \> 9 g/dL (patients includables even after red blood cell transfusion)-Reference CTScan +/-MRI performed in 21 days preceding the first cycle of treatment
You may not qualify if:
- Symptomatic primary colorectal tumor in place
- Contraindication for allergy of rank 3-4 for one of the compounds of chemotherapy- Peripheral neuropathy \> 2 (Levy Scale)
- Concomitant systemic treatment by immunotherapy, chemotherapy or hormonotherapy- Unbalanced serious illness, unchecked active infection or the other underlying serious disorder susceptible to prevent the patient from receiving the treatment
- Intestinal occlusion or sub-occlusion or history of inflammatory intestinal disease
- Other cancer during the 5 years preceding entry in the trial or concomitant (except in situ cancer of the cervix or skin basal cell carcinoma)Patient in custody or under guardianship, Impossibility to adhere to the medical follow-up for geographical, social or psychiatric reason
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centre Georges Francois Leclerclead
- National Cancer Institute, Francecollaborator
- Hospira, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Centre Georges François Leclerc
Dijon, 21000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2011
First Posted
May 5, 2011
Study Start
December 15, 2010
Primary Completion
December 15, 2010
Study Completion
April 18, 2018
Last Updated
July 16, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07